Ten years after the Higgs Boson: there are no new particles found.

    Ten years after the Higgs Boson: there are no new particles found. 

In 2012 researchers celebrated that they found Higgs Boson. And after that, there have been ten years without new particles. The Higgs Boson was a boson as calculated, but the problem is that the boson is too light. Otherwise, it matched calculations. And that thing was the scientific sensation. There was one small detail that researchers passed. 

That detail was that in calculations, Higgs Boson required an asteroid-belt-sized mega-accelerator for coming out. That too-light Higgs Boson caused a theory, that maybe the Higgs Boson is still not found. And researchers found some other non-predicted particles that they named Higgs Boson. 

The behavior of the Higgs Boson tells that there could be one or two particles in that boson. Another interesting thing is that there is no force that Higgs boson seems to carry. All other bosons are force carriers. So where is the force, that Higgs Boson should carry? 

Another reason for the problem that Higgs Boson seems to be too light could be that its energy level is so high, and energy flows so fast forming small quantum vacuum or virtual particles around it that it loses its mass faster than predicted. In some other models Higgs Boson hovers in the energy field. And that makes it seem lighter than it should be. When Higgs Boson divides it forms W and Z bosons. That thing tells that the quantum field around that boson travels outside, forming whirls. Some of those whirls are W and Z bosons which are weak nuclear force transportators. So is the original Higgs particle still unseen? 

The next mission of the CERN is to search supersymmetric, high-energy elementary particles. Those researchers hope that they can uncover the secrecy of dark matter. But that thing seems more complicated than nobody expected. Supersymmetric particles are very high-energy versions of well-known particles. The supersymmetric version of quarks is squark. And, supersymmetric version of neutrino is neutralino. But nobody found those particles yet. Theoretical sfermions are supersymmetrical high-energy versions of fermions. The rise of energy level to high enough will turn fermion to sfermion. 

There are four billion collimations for finding a particle called Higgs Boson, we must realize that finding things like WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles).  And the other, possible supersymmetric particles. The form of WIMP could be that it will somehow tunnel itself through other particles. And that tunneling effect makes it impossible to see those particles. But it's not sure that is a WIMP supersymmetric particle. 

https://home.cern/science/physics/supersymmetry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutralino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sfermion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Do neutron stars have quark cores?

  Do neutron stars have quark cores? 

"New theoretical analysis places the likelihood of massive neutron stars hiding cores of deconfined quark matter between 80 and 90 percent. The result was reached through massive supercomputer runs utilizing Bayesian statistical inference." (ScitechDaily.com/Neutron Stars’ Inner Mysteries: A Glimpse Into Quark-Matter Cores)

Neutron star's inner cores might involve quark cores. That means there could be also quark stars in the universe. Theoretical models made at the University of Helsinki support the possibility that heavy neutron stars are quark cores. That thing opens a very interesting vision for gravitation and star research. In theoretical models, Magnetars are very light neutron stars. Which shell rotates very fast around its structure. That forms a very strong magnetic field. 

In heavy neutron stars. Gravity locks structure into its entirety. And that makes those heavy neutron stars' magnetic fields weaker but their gravity fields are stronger. That means gravity seems acting like some kind of membrane or strings. That travels between or through neutrons. And that locks the structure into one piece. 

"Artist’s impression of the different layers inside a massive neutron star, with the red circle representing a sizable quark-matter core. Credit: Jyrki Hokkanen, CSC" (ScitechDaily.com/Neutron Stars’ Inner Mysteries: A Glimpse Into Quark-Matter Cores)

Hypothetical quark star: an object intermediate. Between neutron stars and black holes.

We can think that the quark star is an object intermediate between neutron stars and black holes. Nobody has seen that thin yet, so it's a theoretical object. 

The mass of neutron stars determines their quark core's size. And in light neutron stars might not be quark core. Then there would be no quark core or a very small quark core in magnetars. But the part of the pure quark structure in neutron stars rises when their mass rises. And when a collapsing star's mass is high enough all neutrons turn into quarks and form a quark star. 

But then we can continue this thinking game. The idea is that the model can also be in white dwarfs and black holes. So in a very heavy white dwarfs could be neutron stars inside them. In a very heavy quark stars could be back holes in the free quark structure. 

The quark star forms when a neutron star turns too heavy that neutrons can keep their shells. The extreme gravity along with neutron radiation, strips those quantum fields away from the neutrons. That uncovers quarks. And the quark stars would be much denser than neutron stars. Those quarks send their radiation in the wavelength that is the same as the quark's dimension. And that thing could make the quark star almost invisible. 

The quark structure would be far stronger than the neutron structure. That means inside the heaviest quark structures can form a black hole or area where even light cannot escape. And in that model is possible. That those quarks form a symmetrical quark net around that black hole. That quark net could keep that structure in its form. 

In some models, there is the possibility that also gluons can form structures that are similar to quarks. Those gluon stars are hypothetical things, and they are very close to black holes. In some models when a hypothetical quark star massive gravity pushes those quarks so close to each other. That they will push gluons out from that structure. In that model, the quark stars are the only things between black holes and neutron stars. 

Is there gluon stars?

If a quark star exists, is it possible that gluon stars also exist? Gluon is not fermion. But it's a near possible limit that massive gravity and radiation pressure in a supernova form black hole there is a network of gluons near its event horizon. Gluons are gauge bosons. But a black hole's strong gravity and energy load locks those gluons into position making them interact like quarks that are fermions. 

In some other models intensive pressure and heat in high-mass quark stars can form structures where is only quark-gluon or gluon plasma. That kind of structure is a hypothetical thing. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/calculations-point-to-massive-quark-stars/

https://scitechdaily.com/neutron-stars-inner-mysteries-a-glimpse-into-quark-matter-cores/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_star

Pandora: searching exomoons.

   Pandora: searching exomoons. 

When we make models of another solar system, we use our solar system as a model. That means the gas giants should have moons because most of the planets in our solar system have moons. But we have not yet seen one. The reason for that is that those exoplanets, like gas giants, can be so massive that small moons cannot cause anomalies in their trajectories. And most of the exomoons should be quite small objects. 

If some large, about Earth-size moon, orbits some massive planet or brown dwarf and the system will not make over overpass between its star and Earth, and the moon doesn't travel between its planet or brown dwarf and Earth those kinds of moons are hard to detect. And if that moon orbits bright stars like G-2 or Sun-type stars it's even harder to see. The star's brightness will not decrease if a small planet travels between it and Earth. Also normal stellar activity, like starspots, can cause changes in the star's brightness. 

This artist’s impression shows a gas giant exoplanet orbiting a sun-like star, exemplified by Kepler-1625b. Credit: NASA (ScitechDaily.com/Pandora’s Box of Cosmic Mysteries: Rethinking Giant Exomoons)

"Several influences can create a moon-like signal in a light curve – even without the presence of an actual moon. Credit: MPS/hormesdesign.de" (ScitechDaily.com/Pandora’s Box of Cosmic Mysteries: Rethinking Giant Exomoons)

"Research reveals that giant gas planets in other star systems often make their Earth-like neighbors uninhabitable by disrupting orbits and climates. Unlike Jupiter’s protective role in our solar system, these planets frequently prevent the development of stable, life-supporting conditions, highlighting the exceptional nature of our planetary configuration. Artist’s depiction of an extra-solar system that is crowded with giant planets. Credit: NASA/Dana Berry." (ScitechDaily.com/Chaos Reigns in the Cosmos: How Giant Gas Planets Threaten Life on Nearby Earth-Like Worlds)

Large gas giants can also endanger lifeforms in exoplanet systems. Large and massive exoplanets pull objects to them. And especially in young solar systems cosmic impacts can strip atmospheres off the planets. Also in more mature systems gas giants pull comets and asteroids to them. And the main question is can the large moon host lifeforms? 

The risk of cosmic impacts is higher near large and massive exoplanets. That thing can cause possible lifeforms can form later on those moons. But otherwise, we can say that Titan has also an atmosphere, and we have not seen any devastating impacts with asteroids and Titan. 

We know that in the past that kind of impact destroyed many protoplanets in the chaotic young solar system. One of those impacts, Earth's impact with a large asteroid or protoplanet Theia almost destroyed Earth. Remnants of that impact still exist in Earth's Magma. Also if the exomoon is too close to its giant planet, that planet can strip off its moon's atmosphere. 

But otherwise, the exomoons can have bigger tidal water. And that means they can be good places for life forms and evolution. But there is a possibility that those tidal forces lock the moon to its planet. That means the hypothetical exomoon would always turn the same side to its planet. In that case, the day on that exomoon lasts the same time as its orbiting time. 

Does the planet lock its moon? That depends on the distance of the moon from its planet. In some models. That moon would travel through the planet's shadow. But the moon can have a polar trajectory that can make it possible for an exomoon's rotation time around its axle could be 24 hours. The distance to the exoplanet determines does the moon locks. 

https://scitechdaily.com/chaos-reigns-in-the-cosmos-how-giant-gas-planets-threaten-life-on-nearby-earth-like-worlds/

https://scitechdaily.com/pandoras-box-of-cosmic-mysteries-rethinking-giant-exomoons/

Relativistic jet: galactic light saber.

   Relativistic jet: galactic light saber. 

"Princeton researchers have found that the M87* black hole expels energy outward, contributing to the formation of massive jets. This discovery, rooted in Einstein’s theory of relativity, challenges traditional views of black holes and could be further tested with advanced telescopes. The study opens new avenues in understanding black hole dynamics, though it stops short of definitively explaining the source of the jets’ power. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily.com/Einstein’s Twist: Princeton Astrophysicists Unravel the Mystery of Black Hole Jets and Galactic “Lightsabers”)

"An animation showing how the magnetic field crossing the black hole’s event horizon twists up as as the black hole rotates more quickly. A faster-rotating black hole `winds up’ the magnetic field more quickly, causing the black hole to lose more energy to its surroundings. A team of Princeton astrophysicists observed the wind-up of magnetic field lines in images from the Event Horizon Telescope of the linear polarization from black holes. Credit: Video by George Wong, Institute for Advanced Stud" (ScitechDaily.com/Einstein’s Twist: Princeton Astrophysicists Unravel the Mystery of Black Hole Jets and Galactic “Lightsabers")

It's possible that when a black hole rotates faster and faster. That electromagnetic whirl takes a gravitational field with it. The gravitational field is very much like other fields. And when the electromagnetic field rotates fast enough, the superstrings that form a magnetic field can touch the gravitational superstrings. Or they can collect so many gravitational superstrings that they can take the gravitational field with it. 

The fast-rotating energy fields are like heat pumps. And they transport energy out from black holes. Same way, when a relativistic jet travels through the electromagnetic and gravitational field it transports energy out from the magnetic field and possibly also from the gravitational field. While that jet travels through those fields they pump energy in it. Like laser pumps energy in laser element. 

 Whenever a black hole sends gravitational waves it loses part of its mass. When a black hole's mass gets lower, its size will turn smaller. During that prosess there is forming a small vacuum that pulls energy out from it. 

The relativistic jet of black holes is the most powerful phenomenon in the universe. The power of those jets is enormous. And the Princeton astronomers created the model, of how a black hole's magnetic field, along with gravitation makes those galactic lightsabers possible. The idea is that the particles around a black hole travel to its poles through the transition disk. 

When those particles hit together at the equator. That forms radiation that travels away from the event horizon. The speed of particles that travel and impact with opposite coming particles and particles, that travel in material disk around the black hole is very high. And they involve lots of kinetic energy in those impacts. That means the particles that come from three sides hit together. 

And then, that radiation gives energy to particles that travel to black hole poles. When those particles hit together at the black hole's poles, that thing raises their energy to a very high level. The relativistic jet formation happens near the event horizon. There it collects radiation and particles that fall from space around the black hole. 

It's possible. Those jets can turn particles in the middle of them into so-called parasite black holes. That means there are one or more black holes in the relativistic jets. Those small black holes that can form chains get their energy from the main black hole and its jets. in some visions, there is a gravitational tornado in the black hole's poles. That tornado interacts with its environment like a sonic whirl. 

This gravitational tornado doesn't let another gravitational field get in it. The reason for that is its formation consists of intertwined gravitational superstrings. Those superstrings collect gravitational radiation in their structure. Because that structure has a higher energy level than elsewhere in a black hole, it reflects gravitational radiation. This gravitational tornado denies that a gravitational field cannot fall in that tornado. 

The tornado can tie a gravitational field to its shell. The electromagnetic low pressure in the tornado keeps it in form. And it transfers the wave movement out from the black hole through the poles. That energy that travels to the black hole's poles is the negative energy. That thing transports energy into the polar directions. That maintains the suction that keeps the event horizon in its form. The gravitational tornado acts like a thermal pump that aims energy to the black hole's poles. The main question is does that energy travel straight out from the poles? Or does it travel to the black hole's equator where it impacts with energy that comes from another pole? 

And that thing can create a small non-gravitational area in the black hole's poles. So in this model. Wornholes or Einstein-Rose bridges are inside those jets. Those jets can also form electromagnetic wormholes themselves. The high-power radiation pumps energy to particles that travel in the jets. And that thing can raise those particle's energy levels to a very high level. That makes it possible for those particles to turn into black holes. 

https://scitechdaily.com/einsteins-twist-princeton-astrophysicists-unravel-the-mystery-of-black-hole-jets-and-galactic-lightsabers/