The neutron star followed an oval trajectory before it collided with a black hole.

“Artist’s impression of an eccentric neutron star–black hole binary. The neutron star’s path is shown in blue and the black hole’s motion in orange as the two objects orbit each other. The eccentricity shown here is exaggerated compared to the real system, GW200105, to make the effect on the orbital motion clearer. Credit: Geraint Pratten, Royal Society University Research Fellow, University of Birmingham” (ScitechDaily, Scientists Spot a Black Hole-Neutron Star Pair Breaking the Rules of Cosmic Orbits)

The neutron star’s unusual trajectory when it fell into a black hole. The thing that formed that unusual oval trajectory could be the third component. There could be a possibility. That there was something unseen. Maybe the second back hole in the system before the final impact. The third participant can be outside the system. Or maybe it's very close to the back hole. 

The neutron star and black hole collided, and this thing defies predicted models. The neutron star impacted the black hole following an oval trajectory. This means that the closest point in that trajectory moved closer and closer to the black hole. And then the black hole pulled that neutron star inside it. The reason for that trajectory is that the neutron star got more energy when it closed the black hole. 

Similarly, in cases where black holes merge with neutron stars, they also have their own material disk. The impact of material disks will create energy, which pushes the neutron star away from the black hole. This also explains gamma-rays. From those mergers. 

The material disk interacts with the black hole material disk, and that forms energy. So this means that the shape of the trajectory remains similar. But sooner or later, the black hole “steals” the neutron star’s material disk. This means that the neutron star will not get as much energy from the impact of those material disks. This means that the black hole pulls the neutron star closer and closer to it. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-spot-a-black-hole-neutron-star-pair-breaking-the-rules-of-cosmic-orbits/

How can the black hole merger form gamma-ray bursts?

When black holes collide, that event sends gravitational waves. There is a possibility that the gamma-ray burst (GRB) forms when those black holes’ halos touch each other. Every black hole is surrounded by material disks and photons that orbit it. The black holes. That participate. In this event. They were about 50 times larger than the sun. 

”Together, the two black holes weighed more than 100 times the mass of the Sun, placing the event among the most massive stellar-mass black hole mergers detected so far. Most previously observed mergers involve systems with only a few tens of solar masses.”(Interesting Engineering, A cosmic surprise: Black hole merger may have sparked a gamma-ray burst) 

The large size and heavy mass of those black holes tell. That. Those black holes could be the result of previous mergers. They were extremely large stellar black holes. 

Before black holes’ event horizons touch each other, those halos of matter and photons cross each other. In that case, if those halos and material disks impact each other. Particles that orbit those black holes interact, and these interactions can form the GRB. In this case, the GRB formation happens. When those halos that orbit in opposite directions impact each other. In those large black holes, their halos are quite large. 

And that means those halos have a time to reach a very high energy level. If those black holes were smaller, or their sizes were different. This can mean that the interaction between those material halos is shorter. That forms the shorter. And lower energy gamma- or X-ray flash. This thing. It can prove primordial black holes. 

And if all black hole mergers form the gamma-rays, this thing should mean that all of those black holes spin in opposite directions. That causes the model. The black holes turn. Into superposition and entanglement. Before they impact. Every time particles go into quantum entanglement, they spin in opposite directions. In the same way, if the black holes go into quantum entanglement, they will turn to spin in opposite directions. 

When we start to think that the source of the mysterious gamma-ray bursts is the cases where the black hole’s material disks and halos touch each other, that can be the first evidence about the miniature, primordial black holes. Those miniature, or planetary-mass black holes, form similar halos around them as larger black holes. 

This means that. Maybe some gamma-ray lightning, whose origin is in lone black holes, can merge with a small black hole. Those black holes could form when the radiation from the bigger black hole presses. A planet or some other objects in the form of a black hole. This means that the black hole could clone itself. 

https://interestingengineering.com/space/black-hole-merger-produces-light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

The ancient mega-stars. Could be. The origin of ancient black holes.

“Star Collapse Black Hole Jet Art Astronomers may have finally uncovered the origin of the universe’s earliest supermassive black holes. Observations from the James Webb Space Telescope revealed an unusual chemical signature in a distant galaxy. And. It points to the existence of colossal first-generation stars thousands of times more massive than the Sun. Credit: SciTechDaily.com” (ScitechDaily, JWST Detects Evidence of “Monster Stars” That May Have Created the Universe’s First Giant Black Holes)

Could those giant stars be? A so-called. But still hypothetical. Quasi-stars. Or black hole stars? 

In some models, the first stars in the ancient universe were so-called quasi-stars or black hole stars. Those hypothetical stars could get their energy from a black hole inside them. The black hole pulls hydrogen from around it into the form of a hollow shell. And there could be nuclear reactions in that shell that formed heavier elements. 

New observations tell us about the first stars. Those giant stars formed just after the Big Bang. And there is a possibility that those stars are the origin of the universe’s first black holes. The major problem with the universe’s history is: What came first? Were black holes before the first stars, or were the first stars before the black holes? In the cosmological models, the only element that formed straight after the Big Bang was hydrogen. 

The main question is, what made hydrogen ions or atoms fall into stars? Could there be some kind of electron clouds that pulled protons together? And then those electrons remained to orbit those protons. This means that atoms formed in those first stars. The problem is. What made protons, or atomic hydrogen, fall and form stars? There are a couple of possibilities. The first thing could be the negative electromagnetic field. That could form an electron cloud, which pulls protons to it. 

“The size comparison of a Quasi-star with other stars.” (Wikipedia, The size comparison of a Quasi-star with other stars.)

Another thing. That which can launch the stellar formation is small black holes or some kind of voids in the young universe. The gravity center, like small primordial black holes. It can make matter accumulate around it. But the cosmic void can also act like a black hole. 

If some kind of radiation beam. Can create a cosmic void. It’s possible that when that kind of void collapses. The idea is that the cosmic high-energy beam pushes particles and quantum fields away from its route. Then the gravity. Along with the falling quantum fields. That travel into that cosmic void. Pull those hydrogen atoms into that cosmic emptiness. And that effect can be connected with the gravity. Together, those things, the collapsing comic void and gravity, can launch star formation. 

Another thing that can create those cosmic voids. It could be matter-antimatter annihilation. There could be antimatter existing. In the young universe. And electron-positron or proton-antiproton annihilation could form those cosmic voids that start to pack matter from around them. 

Particles can travel across that emptiness at very high speeds, and that can form a whirl in the nebula. The problem. In those things is the gravity. And the electromagnetic pulling effect must. Win over the electromagnetic pushing. 

There are only electrons and protons; something must happen that allows those particles and atoms to form the stars. Atomic hydrogen reacts very weakly with other hydrogen atoms. And there must form some kind of structure that starts to pack those atoms. 

https://scitechdaily.com/jwst-detects-evidence-of-monster-stars-that-may-have-created-the-universes-first-giant-black-holes/

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star

The planet is in the wrong place.

“LHS 1903 is a small red M-dwarf star that is cooler and shines less brightly than our Sun. Scientists used telescopes in space and on Earth to discover four planets orbiting LHS 1903. With those telescopes, they classified the three closest planets to the star as the innermost being rocky, and the two that follow it as gas giants. Credit: ESA” (ScitechDaily, Astronomers Stunned by Rocky Planet in the Wrong Place)

“Scientists have identified a rocky outer planet in a system where a gas giant was expected. The discovery challenges traditional models and supports the idea that planets may form one by one in changing environments.” (ScitechDaily, Astronomers Stunned by Rocky Planet in the Wrong Place)

Could xxoplanet LHS 1903 e be a rogue planet that a red dwarf HS 1903 captured? This explains the exoplanet’s wrong trajectory. 

The exoplanet  LHS 1903 e is a rocky world near a red dwarf star LHS 1903. This planet is extraordinary. Because of its trajectory. The LHS 1903 has a planetary system, where the closest exoplanet is a rocky world. Then there will be two scaled-down versions of Neptune. So, those planets are gas-rich. But then. The last known planet, LHS 1903 e. 

It is again a rocky world. This means that the LHS 1903 e doesn’t follow the rule about the order of the planets. So, this “wrong position”. Causes an idea. This exoplanet could have originated around some other star. And then that star lost this planet. Maybe the nova or supernova eruption kicked that exoplanet LHC 1903 e from its trajectory. 

So, could the origin of the dwarf planet Pluto in our solar system be a rogue planet? 

The hypothesis about the rogue planet that the star captured can explain some details about the dwarf planet Pluto and its moon, Charon. There are several theories about the origin of Pluto. The first one is that Pluto’s origin was as the moon of Uranus or Neptune. The one other explanation . About Pluto. It could be. That Pluto. It was. Some kind of rogue asteroid. Or a dwarf planet. That our solar system captured.

https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-stunned-by-rocky-planet-in-the-wrong-place/

Can the cosmic web cause dark interactions in the universe?

On top of that text. Is the image. Of. The cosmic web. The cosmic web is the giant structure of colossal strings. The image shows that the cosmic web forms structures that seem like neurons. This causes the cosmic web, sometimes called “Cosmic neural structure”, which causes ideas of the intelligent universe.

The dark energy source can be in empty areas near the cosmic web. Maybe. They collect energy and then reflect it, causing energy asymmetry. Those. Lower-energy and less dense areas. Which seems darker, can act like vacuum bombs. They focus energy. And reflect it. 

The denser areas in the universe transmit energy waves more strongly than the less dense areas. But the thing is that. Energy always travels out from denser structures. 

And then that energy spreads faster. So a denser structure can. Only focus energy more effectively than the area outside it. The energy wave that travels in denser structures stays together, or keeps its form better, than energy waves that travel into less dense structures. 

If energy is released into a cosmic bubble, like the Boötes void, that energy jumps back from the middle of that void. This means that the cosmic voids act like vacuum bombs. They collect energy in the middle of the bubble and jump it out of it. This kind of cosmic bubble void can also exist outside the galactic superclusters. So. Those cosmic bubbles can exist in the extremely low-energy areas in the universe. They can collect energy. And then send it back. And that can be one of the reasons for dark energy. 

Dark energy and dark matter are things that cause grey hair for researchers. The question is: what puts energy into motion in the universe? The answer can be found in the cosmic web, also known as cosmic megastructures. That megastructure forms a denser particle-energy field formation than areas outside the megastructure. This means energy flows away from the megastructure. This causes the asymmetry in energy fields. 

The energy flows from the web to the environment around it, happening throughout the whole trip, but the strongest energy flow is released from the ends of those giant strings. If the “walls” of those. Giant structures. They are denser than their internal structures, so that energy also goes into the middle of those structures. That means those structures form the maser effect that turns their internal structures into a high energy level. The energy is interacting, and also things like particles outside that cosmic structure send wave movement, because they vaporize or turn into energy faster than particles in that structure. 

If the densest part of the structure is its shell, that means the strongest energy wave travels in that shell. The structure acts like a giant maser that transports energy into the shockwave, a pressure front that travels at the edge of the universe. If. The cosmic web is the structure that sends dark energy, which can explain why that energy affects only the largest structures. 

The cosmic web, or one of the veins. Or its massive strings send wave movement through the universe. The wave’s size is so colossal that it can move only another string. The system sends those waves through. Extremely thin. Matter and energy fields. So the mutual gravity in those strings doesn’t let galaxies and galaxy clusters travel away. So those energy impulses move those giant structures. As. An entirety. 

The dark matter can be dark because it. Because identical particles form that matter. Or. Maybe. Those particles are almost. Identical. And if those particles' energy level decreases all the time. When their distances grow from the energy center, they don’t violate even the Pauli exclusion principle. 

The idea is that the dark matter particles. Form a cloud of identical particles around the visible matter. Because. Those particles. Are identical. 

Only their energy level decreases when their distance from the visible particle decreases, which means energy travels without resistance out from the visible particle. If those dark matter particles are identical, that means they act as 2D materials do. But. That action is in the 3D space. 

The difference between the universe and the laboratory is that. The universe is far bigger, and energy is spread over such a large area, that it cannot form a detectable echo or reflection. Another thing is that. The system that is in the universe between those cosmic web strings has no edge. The energy travels between particles. That distance is over one meter. So, if those two particles, like protons or electrons, are over a meter, that is possible outside the galaxy superclusters. That causes a situation. That reflection of those particles spreads into such a large area. That. It becomes so weak. That. We cannot see it. 

This means the energy travels between particles, and only a small percentage of it impacts other particles. Because. The gravitational interaction is similar to that of dark matter and visible matter. 

That means. Dark matter is denser near those cosmic web strings. That causes an effect where energy travels out from those strings. It travels into space, which has a far lower energy level than. This low-energy matter is around the cosmic web. And that causes an effect where energy travels out from that area into the area where dark matter particles are over longer distances than they are near those cosmic web structures.

The reason we cannot see dark matter can be found. In. The system models. The system model can describe that visible matter, or visible particles, can be so bright that they can cover other particles with their shine. The idea is. The visible matter. It can be like a propeller. That aims energy, or wave movement, into the dark matter particles. Those dark matter particles can be smaller than electrons. This means that the visible matter sends energy into the harmonic system. That is a form of smaller particles. Those smaller particles can be homogeneous. 

Or close to the homogenous particle cloud. This means that the homogenous particle cloud can act like 2D matter. The cloud of quarks or some other particles can transport energy without resistance through space. This means that if energy travels through a homogeneous particle cloud, it can travel through it without causing an echo. The energy level outside that system is minimal, and that pulls energy only in one direction. 

That means the lower energy area. Simply. Pulls energy from the visible particle. That energy spreads through the system. The energy spreads into such large areas that it cannot cause reflection that we can see. Those systems have no edge, or the edge is so far that energy cannot form a standing wave at the edge of the system. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/gravitationally-bound-expanding-universe/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C3%B6tes_Void

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field_(classical)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inhomogeneous_cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large-scale_structure_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_(astronomy)

Europa’s oceans are silent.

"Cutaway illustration of Europa’s icy crust, subsurface ocean, and possible vents that transport material to the surface. Credit: NASA" (ScitechDaily, Scientists Say Europa’s Ocean May Be Too Quiet for Life)

Jupiter’s  Europa-moon oceans can be dead. So, new research suggests. That there are no lifeforms under that moon’s icy surface. When we think about Europa’s oceans. The Europa moon's oceans. They are not like oceans on Earth. Those oceans remain liquid because the gravity of that moon is very weak. Jupiter’s gravity causes powerful tidal waves. Under. Icy shell of that interesting moon. This tidal force causes the water whirl around that moon’s core. 

"A new study led by Paul Byrne, an associate professor of Earth, environmental, and planetary sciences, raises doubts about whether Europa’s ocean could support life at its base. By analyzing the moon’s size, the composition of its rocky interior, and the gravitational pull it experiences from Jupiter, the research team found little evidence that Europa has the kind of active geology thought to be essential for life. Their results suggest the moon lacks tectonic movement, hydrothermal vents, and other forms of underwater activity that could supply energy to living systems." (ScitechDaily, Scientists Say Europa’s Ocean May Be Too Quiet for Life)

And this thing makes the magnetic field for that moon. The magnetic field. Denies cosmic radiation and radiation that comes from Jupiter’s plasma ring from destroying water molecules on the Europa moon. Europa is the icy water moon. This means that magma, which is the liquid rock under Earth’s shell, is replaced by water in Europa. 

Magnetic field. Forms when the magnetic mineral dust in the water spins around the core of that moon. So, can there be lifeforms in that moon’s ocean? The thing is that there are no things like fish. The creatures that researchers may hope to find are primitive bacteria-type organisms. If those organisms exist, their metabolism will be very slow. 

There is a possibility that those organisms can synthesize oxygen from water. Using electrolysis, which can form when the noble and base metals are near each other. This electrolysis might not be very effective. But if there are no beasts in that ocean, that can be enough for those organisms to maintain their processes. Those things are only guesses. But the thing is that. This moon can also be dead and cold. But the thing is that Europa itself is interesting. That moon can tell. About conditions. What is on icy planets, and why can those planets that can be giant ice giants exist? 

There may be no geothermal energy in Europa. This means that the core of that moon. It can be. A very small. Thing. Without radioactive material. And the energy that keeps the oceans liquid forms when tidal forces and the cryovolcanos cooperate. The cryovolcano forms low pressure. Under the moon’s icy shell, that weak gravity keeps water molecules separate. The tidal forces. Puts those molecules in motion, in the weak gravity. Because of. In weak gravity, water can be liquid in far lower temperatures than on Earth. If there are lifeforms, those lifeforms can hover in the freezing water rather than be on the bottom of the moon. 

We can determine life as a self-replicating structure. Those structures can react and interact with each other. The fact is. Nobody knows what organisms on other planets or moons look like. Some models suggest that. On very low-temperature moons or planets, DNA can create ice bites. These are DNA-controlled. There is a model. That alien organisms can be water ice. And theoretically. The nanobubbles can form a similar structure to the DNA. Those things cannot be stable on Earth. But. In very low-energy, stable conditions, it is possible that the self-replicating structures can exist. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-say-europas-ocean-may-be-too-quiet-for-life/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europa_(moon)

Sterile neutrino is ruled out.

"A high-precision neutrino experiment has delivered a decisive result that challenges a long-standing explanation for mysterious signals seen in earlier studies. By carefully dissecting how neutrinos transform as they travel, researchers have narrowed the range of viable theories and set the stage for a new phase of investigation. Credit: Stock" (ScitechDaily, A 30-Year Physics Mystery Takes a Sharp Turn: This Bizarre Particle Doesn’t Actually Exist)

A sterile neutrino means a neutrino that formed straight from electromagnetic fields. If that particle exists, that means it formed in the sensor itself. The thing. That can form. The neutrino. Directly from wave movement. Are the Schwinger effect and the wave-particle duality. Even if a sterile neutrino exists, it will not remain sterile. For. A long time. And that means it's almost impossible to confirm those sterile neutrinos. 

Neutrino is the second generation of fermions. Or, sharper saying, neutrinos are members of the lepton family. Leptons are electrons, muons, and tauons. Those particles form in a weak interaction with leptons. We know three types of neutrons. Tau neutrino, electron neutrino and muon neutrino. Those particles are transformations to electrons, tau particles, and muons. 

Or, they form in reactions from muons, taus, and electrons. This means that we don’t actually know neutrinos. This means that. We don’t know. The neutrino that formed in the Schwinger effect. We don’t know. The neutrino, that form. It is direct. In. The wave-particle duality. Neutrinos are formed in the interaction when the weak nuclear force interacts with leptons. 

Sterile neutrino is ruled out, at least for a while. For being sterile, the neutrino must form in a sensor. Otherwise, if a neutrino travels only a short distance, it turns dirty. Neutrino takes quantum fields with it. This means that the neutrino turns dirty. We can call those quantum fields. As “quantum plague”. 

And. Even if a neutrino stays in a static position, it will turn dirty because the “quantum wind” makes it messy. A sterile neutrino cannot exist in our universe, or its existence remains for such a short time. That means we cannot see it. So even if a neutrino forms in the fusion reactor. It turns dirty before it reaches the sensor. The problem with sterile neutrino hunting is that nobody has seen a sterile neutrino. Reseachers see those dirty neutrinos quite often. 

Quantum fields touch those neutrinos. And those fields are left as a plague on those neutrinos that neutrino sensors detect. But the thing that makes it almost impossible to detect and confirm the sterile neutrino is that. The system must know what kind of fields are touched on those neutrinos. So, the system calculates the thickness of that quantum plague. 

If reseachers want to find sterile neutrinos, they must know how much energy, or how thick the quantum layer is through which neutrinos are collected. While their journey to Earth. But. For making those calculations, the system must know the precise point of the Big Bang, or where the neutrinos formed. Then the system must know all quantum fields between the point where the neutrino formed. And then it can calculate the quantum field that is on the neutrino. But as we know, this kind of mission is impossible. Another thing that rules out the existence of the sterile neutrino is the Pauli exclusion principle. 

“In quantum mechanics, the Pauli exclusion principle (German: Pauli-Ausschlussprinzip) states that two or more identical particles with half-integer spins (i.e. fermions) cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state within a system that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics. This principle was formulated by Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925 for electrons, and later extended to all fermions with his spin–statistics theorem of 1940.” (Wikipedia, Pauli exclusion principle). 

If. We expand this model to the universe’s scale. That means that because a neutrino is a fermion, there can be only one sterile neutrino in the entire universe. The Pauli exclusion principle means that there are no two fully identical neutrinos in the universe. So, if the sterile neutrino exists, that means there cannot be two of them. All sterile neutrinos. Are identical. That situation is impossible. If. We want to follow the Pauli exclusion principle.  

https://scitechdaily.com/a-30-year-physics-mystery-takes-a-sharp-turn-this-bizarre-particle-doesnt-actually-exist/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model