Showing posts with label structures. Show all posts
Showing posts with label structures. Show all posts

Thursday, September 24, 2026

CERN didn’t find evidence of quantum-sized black holes.



“The LHC has ruled out another hiding place for microscopic black holes while unveiling a new way to hunt for physics beyond the Standard Model. Credit: AI/ScienceDaily.com” (ScienceDaily, The LHC just ruled out another hiding place for quantum black holes)

“Physicists at UC Santa Barbara have pushed the search for microscopic black holes at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) into new territory.”(ScienceDaily, The LHC just ruled out another hiding place for quantum black holes)

“These hypothetical black holes would be extraordinarily small and short-lived. If they could be produced at the LHC, their existence might help physicists address some of the deepest unanswered questions about spacetime and gravity. The search also gave researchers a chance to test a new technique for finding rare and previously unknown particles.”(ScienceDaily, The LHC just ruled out another hiding place for quantum black holes)

Could those quantum-sized black holes be the gravitons? And the induction question is: could those mythical WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) be the same quantum black holes? 

Reseachers probably saw one WIMP in deep underground sensors. If. A WIMP is a quantum-sized black hole. That explains why that particle can tunnel itself through everything. The extremely high-energy halo can push those particles through quantum fields away from the route. 

In some models, those quantum-sized black holes can be inside every single particle. That has mass. In those models, quantum-sized black holes form quarks around them. So, if that is right. The quantum pressure keeps those black holes in their form. When. Those quantum fields that we call elementary particles vanish. That. Causes immediate destruction. Without. Quantum pressure. That black hole evaporates immediately. 

“Physicists searching through Large Hadron Collider data found no evidence that the machine has been producing microscopic quantum black holes, but the result sharply narrows where such exotic physics could still be hiding. These hypothetical black holes could form if extra spatial dimensions make gravity much stronger at extremely tiny scales, potentially offering clues toward the long-sought theory of quantum gravity.” (ScienceDaily, The LHC just ruled out another hiding place for quantum black holes)

This means that CERN and the LHC couldn’t create those quantum-sized black holes. One reason could be. Those collisions. And the energy. That formed in them. it. Wasn't symmetrical enough. This means. The impacting particles, like protons, couldn’t compress quarks into quantum-sized black holes. This could explain why. The LHC could form those interesting miniature black holes. 

Another possibility was that the proton-proton collisions formed quantum-sized black holes. But those black holes evaporated so fast. The measurements were impossible. The thing that could make those hypothetical quantum-sized black holes visible is the situation. 

That. The black hole could pull a little bit of energy into itself. That thing makes it possible to measure energy.  That. The black hole releases energy when it evaporates. If. That evaporation happens very soon after the black hole's formation. This thing causes a situation. That evaporating black hole releases as much energy as it bound. That means. That. The black hole could be very hard to detect. 

That evaporation seems like a regular quark collision. The black hole turns Visible. If. It stores enough energy. That. It releases during that process. If that quantum black hole forms in quark-gluon plasma. That black hole must be in an extremely dense environment. The black hole’s energy must be higher than the energy level in its environment. This makes the sensor detect the evaporation. So the black hole needs a little bit of time. To pull more energy into it. Than it had when it was born. 

When a black hole evaporates, it could send X-rays or gamma rays. That kind of radiation could uncover those black holes. But it’s hard to separate it from radiation that comes from those high-energy experiments. 

That makes. It reaches a higher energy level than it had in quark-gluon plasma. The problem is that. If. Those quantum-sized black holes exist. They send gravitational waves. Those waves are very weak. And they remain only when those quantum black holes evaporate. There is a theory. That. Maybe gravitons are those hypothetical quantum black holes. This is one of the most interesting theories in physics. Small black holes can explain dark energy. There is a possibility. That. Near galaxies, energy and matter. 

Along with quantum pressure. Can keep those quantum black holes in their form. When. Those hypothetical black holes escape from the galactic halo. They evaporate. That explanation could seem very strange. But it could explain why we cannot see dark matter. Quantum-sized black holes can explain. Why can't we see dark matter? If dark matter is made of quantum-sized black holes. They could be invisible. 


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/09/260922005649.htm


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Monday, June 29, 2026

Can we live in a giant gravastar?


" A quantum physics experiment showed photons can exhibit negative dwell time while traveling through atoms. Scientists confirmed the phenomenon using weak measurements that minimally disturbed the system. Quantum physicists have uncovered a bizarre phenomenon in which photons appear to spend a “negative” amount of time interacting with atoms before emerging from a cloud of matter." (ScitechDaily, Physicists Have Measured “Negative Time” in Bizarre Quantum Experiment)

There is a suggestion. That there are other universes in the supernova remnants. The giant gravastar explains why our universe behaves as it does. The giant gravastar could pull the universe from every direction.  So. If we think of the possibility that there are other universes. In black holes. Or gravastars. Those things might seem very small. But also if we lived in the universe. That is in the gravastar. That thing means that. From outside. The universe is where we live. It could seem very small. So size is relative. Particles in those Matryoshka universes have different sizes. The term matryoshka universe means that. Universe. It could be multiple internal universes. 

Time is an interesting thing. We know that time runs at different speeds at different points in the universe. Gravitational fields pack quantum fields around the gravity centers. That makes it possible. That matter evolves differently in different places in the universe. Time dilation between Earth and some heavier star might seem meaningless. But in millions of years, even a small difference. Turns into a remarkable. There are models, things like cosmic vacuums. They can turn matter old very fast. The expansion of the universe is the thing. That causes the time. If we think. That time is matter evaporation. 

The dark energy is the thing. That causes the universe’s expansion. There is a model. It’s possible that we live in a black hole. Or rather, saying we could live in a gravastar. The gravastar is the hollow singularity. And the inner event horizon pulls matter against that structure that could surround the entire universe. The gravastar has outer and inner event horizons. That could explain why we cannot see other universes. But it's possible that the large cloud of particles. That moves very fast surrounds the entire universe. There is a possibility. That. Those particles pull energy from the universe. And energy that comes outside the universe. Into them. This means that if those particles bind all the energy into them. That thing makes other universes invisible. And denies us the ability to see things outside our universe. 





Scientists have developed quantum control techniques that can suppress or even reverse a quantum system’s perceived arrow of time, making its behavior appear more consistent with time flowing backward than forward. Researchers investigate how quantum time flow can be stretched, blurred, or even reversed.” (ScitechDaily, Can Time Flow in Reverse? A Quantum Breakthrough Challenges Our Assumptions)



“An expanding mini-universe could counterbalance the collapsing matter of a star, thereby creating a stable gravastar. A new study suggests that the collapse of a massive star could spark the creation of a tiny expanding universe rather than a black hole. The resulting object, called a gravastar, would avoid the singularity and event horizon that make black holes so puzzling. (ScitechDaily,Scientists Say a New Universe Could Form Inside a Dying Star)

Can time flow reverse? 

If time flows in reverse, it would mean that dimensional time exists. The term "dimensional time" means that time is one of the dimensions. Retrocausality is the phenomenon. This particle seems to reach the goal before it should. The reason for that is time dilation. The experiment used photons—quantum particles of light and the against-the-odds journey they must undertake to pass straight through a cloud of rubidium atoms.

"These atoms have a “resonance” with the photons, meaning the energy of the photon can be transferred temporarily to the atoms as an atomic excitation. This allows the photon to “dwell” in the atomic cloud for a time before being released." (ScitechDaily, Physicists Have Measured “Negative Time” in Bizarre Quantum Experiment)

When a photon-particle travels through an extremely cold rubidium atom cloud. Radiation emission from those cold radioactive atoms rises. The energy level in those photons. 

The question is this. Can time dilation turn so strong that the particle reaches its goal before it leaves? This thing requires. A very high-energy-level gamma ray. The particle that travels across those gamma rays can get a high enough energy level. That time dilation makes particles seem to be in the goal before they leave the transmitter. But the big problem is this. The system measured in those tests is the energy level of those particles. So, if those particles have an energy level. Higher than it should be. 

That means the particle is “younger” than it should be. But theoretically, it's possible to create time dilation. So powerful. The particle reaches the goal before it leaves the transmitter. This kind of effect. It can be possible near black holes. Their gravitational field causes the escaping velocity. That is higher than the speed of light. Along with high-power gamma rays, that thing can cause a situation. Those things. Like a photon seems. To be crossing the event horizon before they fall into it. This can make it possible. 




A diagram comparing the structure of a classical black hole with a gravastar. (Wikipedia, Gravastar)



Test: "Teapot Turk". “Nuclear explosion milliseconds after detonation. From the Operation Teapot test series in Nevada, 1955, showing fireball and rope trick effects.” (Wikipedia, Rope trick effect) The cables from the shot tower. It transports. Energy faster out of the fireball than the air. There is a possibility that the quantum-sized black hole that travels through the event horizon can pump energy out from the event horizon. 

Maybe that is the reason for the Hypothetical Hawking radiation. Later in this text is the model. There is Hawking radiation. Because of the effect of the superpositioned and entangled photon- quantum-sized black hole pair. In that model. The quantum entanglement. It steals energy from a black hole. Or it actually steals energy from photons. That whirls around the black hole at the point. Of its event horizon. 




The nuclear fireball millisecond after detonation. 

The model that can explain Hawking Radiation. “Rope trick effects visible from one of Operation Tumbler–Snapper's tower-mounted test shots in 1952, taken with a Rapatronic camera.” (Wikipedia, Rope trick effect)

The superpositioned and entangled photon pair. If another turned into a quantum-sized black hole. It could make. A similar spike into the event horizon of the black hole. As cables from the shot tower make in the nuclear explosion fireballs. The cables from the shot tower transport energy out. From the fireball, faster than the air. And in the cases of the superpositioned photon and a quantum-sized black hole. The cable is the energy string. Or, an energy bridge between those particles. 

In that case, the high-energy radiation from the black hole turns the farther photon from the superpositioned and entangled photon pair into the Kugelblitz black hole. First, energy travels into a black hole. Because of gravity. This means that the gravity steals energy from the photon. That is closer to the event horizon. But the upper photon. It cannot release energy. As fast as a lower photon releases it. Then that very strong radiation turns the upper photon. Into the quantum-sized black hole. That turns the energy flow direction in this quantum entanglement. 

Or maybe the quantum-sized black holes that travel through the black hole’s event horizon steal energy from them. 

The photon makes a superposition with itself. The retrocausality. It can transport information away from the event horizon. The idea is that the other part of this photon pair can turn into a black hole. That quantum-size black hole can steal matter or energy from the black hole’s event horizon. The outer photon is the thing that turns into a black hole. The inner photon is in a superposition and entanglement with that quantum black hole. 

And when that photon falls into a black hole. The string that connects the photon-black hole pair. It can transport energy from the event horizon. The idea is similar to the cases. The nuclear bomb makes the spikes in the fireball during the nuclear tests. in nuclear tests. The cables from the launch tower conducted energy out from the fireball faster than air does. In this quantum case. The wire that transports energy out from the black hole is the string. That connects the photon-black hole pair. Those spikes will conduct energy out from the event horizon. As I wrote before. 


https://scitechdaily.com/can-time-flow-in-reverse-a-quantum-breakthrough-challenges-our-assumptions/


https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-have-measured-negative-time-in-bizarre-quantum-experiment/


https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-say-a-new-universe-could-form-inside-a-dying-star/


https://scitechdaily.com/time-twisted-in-quantum-physics-how-the-future-might-influence-the-past/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravastar


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rope_trick_effect

Saturday, August 23, 2025

What if all we thought about dark matter is wrong?

  What if all we thought about dark matter is wrong? 


Above: Cosmic gamma-ray background.

So, what makes gravitational waves and gravitational fields move? That is the key question in dark matter research. There are suggestions that the gravitational effect that we know as “dark matter” can be quantum-sized black holes, or some kind of particles like axions. The problem is that nobody has seen any axion yet. And if somebody says that the still hypothetical free graviton particles are the thing that forms dark matter, the next question is: what are gravitons? Are they quantum-size black holes?

Gravitons are theoretical gravitation transporter particles. Those particles are things that cause gravitational waves moving. But another thing is that dark matter can be anything that we can imagine. The only known fact is this: there is some kind of gravitational effect whose origin is unknown. 

All four fundamental interactions are some kind of radiation. And each of those interactions has its own individual wavelength. Each fundamental interaction, gravity, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, and electromagnetism, has its own individual radiation type. 

Then we can think about the shape of materia. The particle is like a whisk. The strings that form the particle shell have a certain height. When a particle spins, it binds energy into it as kinetic energy. Sometimes a particle’s energy level turns higher than its environment. And in that moment particle sends waves. Those waves’ wavelength is the same as the particle’s diameter. But the height of those strings also causes limits in that interaction. Strings on the particle’s shell touch the field. Those strings are like flaps on paddlewheels. Their height determines the wave types that the particle can bind to. If those strings are high, that particle can bind a longer wavelength. 

There is one rule for interaction. Radiation or water must have access between those flaps. If the paddlewheel or propeller spins too fast, that causes an effect called supercavitation. The water has no time to fall between those flaps or between the propeller’s blades, which causes the paddle wheel or propeller to spin in a bubble. And that causes an interesting hypothesis. 

Could there be a particle that spins so fast that it causes supercavitation in the quantum fields? Can some particle spin so fast that it can make a cavitation bubble in the gravitational field? If that particle exists, that means gravitation will not affect that particle. Gravitation affects that particle’s quantum bubble. But it doesn’t affect the particle itself like other particles. If particle groups like hadrons spin very fast, their quarks can turn into a straight row. 

That spin can cause a situation where quantum fields or radiation travel to the axle of that particle row. And that can make the particle a hard target for observers. Fast spin can also throw radiation past the particle. This makes it invisible. But can that thing be possible with elementary particles? And can some particle throw gravitational radiation, or gravitational waves, past it? That causes an effect where gravitational waves slide over particles without causing interaction. But can this be true? Heaven knows. 

And in that case. Longer wavelengths. Like electromagnetism covers other, shorter wavelenght below them. That means electromagnetic force covers weak and strong nuclear forces. And gravity below it. If something pulls the G-field into something, that field pulls other fields to that particle. 

There is a possibility to press all parts of an atom into one entirety called a singularity. The reason why we cannot see the singularity is that its so smooth. Those superstrings on its surface are so low that they can bind only short-wave radiation. That means the particle will be surrounded by the standing gravity field. The singularity harnesses the G-field that transports other fields to the singularity.  How long will that singularity remain? As long as the outside fields can press that thing into one entirety. 

But there is a possibility that if the particle spins very fast. That causes a situation where longer wavelengths have no time to fall between those strings. That means the extremely fast-spinning particle drives fields past it like a stealth aircraft. The idea is that the G-field is the shortest wave radiation, and the fastest spinning objects can cause a situation where the only thing that can interact with that particle is the G-field. The G-field is the only thing that has time to fall between those strings. 

This causes another very interesting question. Can there be a so fast-spinning particle that even the gravity field, or G-field, has no time to fall between those strings? If that kind of particle exists. That would be the revolution for physics. 


https://www.space.com/astronomy/dark-universe/what-if-weve-been-thinking-about-dark-matter-all-wrong-scientist-wonders


Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Quarks, gluons, and symmetry.


"A recent experiment led by Mississippi State physicist Dipangkar Dutta has shaken one of physics’ most reliable concepts: symmetry. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, Rethinking the Universe: New Findings Rewrite Rules of Subatomic Matter)


The new research breaks the rules of physics. When an electron collides with quarks, it will not always decay and reassemble symmetrically. That means there is a problem with symmetry in the quarks. The Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state in the same system, explains many aspects of the existence of atoms and subatomic particles.

Because those particle's energy levels are different. That difference causes energy flow. That keeps them in their entirety. 

If there are two identical fermions. That causes the quantum flash that pushes those particles away. When quarks decay they can reassemble themselves. That requires that both of those parts are in the same quantum field. 

That quantum field is like the bag that denies the quantum shadow, or quantum bridge fill. That quantum shadow pulls those quark's halves back together. But there seems to be a situation where when an electron hits quakes the quantum field fills that bridge. If a quantum field turns between parts of a decayed quark, that field denies their reassembly. 

There is also the possibility that if those decayed parts of the quarks spin oppositely that event turns the quantum field between those particles into a shape that looks like twisted fabric. That means the energy density or energy level between those particles rises so high, that they cannot cross that bridge. That is one of the most interesting things in modern physics. That helps researchers make models about the strong interaction. 

Because energy travels from quarks to gluons. Gluon aims for energy flow to the outside. Because energy travels from quark to gluon, that acts like a thermal pump. It keeps those quarks close to each other. The reason why gluons can bind quarks together is that it cannot get energy from emptiness. It collects that energy from the system where it exists. 





The idea is that quarks spin. The spinning quarks also bind energy into them. The problem is that those quarks sometimes release that energy. That happens when their energy level turns higher than their environment. The gluon is like a thermal pump that aims for energy that the quarks release. 

That means the gluon that is in the quantum shadow between quarks keeps the energy flowing in a certain direction and a certain way. Without gluons, the quarks release their energy symmetrically, and that energy flash pushes those quarks away from each other. The gluon's role in the system is to keep energy flow stable. Because it binds energy from the quark's quantum fields it pulls them into it. That thing causes a situation in which the outside energy starts to push those quarks into the form that we call hadrons. So energy flow between quarks keeps that structure in its form. 

The idea is that the gluon is an extremely fast-spinning particle. That is a little bit flat. That particle binds quantum fields from quarks into the kinetic energy. When quarks come close to each other there forms a quantum (or energy) shadow between them. When gluon spins in that energy shadow it binds energy. 

And deepens that quantum low pressure. This thing stretches those quark's energy fields. Then the fast-spinning gluon binds those fields into themselves. Then the gluon acts like a centrifugal plate that aims energy to the sides of it. Because gluon conducts energy out from the system it pulls those quarks together. Or, otherwise, we can say that outcoming energy pushes quarks near each other. 

If we use a superstring model with gluon that thing looks like the plate that is formed of the strings or wires. Or, otherwise, it looks like a flat whisk. Those wires, or superstrings throw quantum fields to the sides of that particle. The gluon allows the quantum spikes that the quarks stretch quantum field forms to touch the gluon. The gluon aims energy out from them. And that forms quantum low-pressure. 

The strong interaction is the thing that keeps protons and neutrons in their form. In those hadrons, the outcoming energy or quantum fields push quarks so that they can keep their formation in hadrons. That means there is so-called quantum low-pressure that keeps quarks in the forms of protons and neutrons. 

There are models where the gluon. The strong interaction transmitting particle spins between those quarks. That means gluon binds energy into itself. When gluon touches the quantum field around it binds that field into the kinetic energy. That energy pulls the quarks together. When gluon goes between quarks. It pulls energy from the quark's quantum fields. That thing makes those fields stretch. And the gluon simply conducts energy out from that point. 


https://scitechdaily.com/rethinking-the-universe-new-findings-rewrite-rules-of-subatomic-matter/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Friday, December 30, 2022

Charm quark in a proton and invisibility of material.

Proton


Could there be a quark that is invisible to the observer? There is the possibility that if some particle is rotating or spinning so fast that impacting wave motion travels over it continuing to the direction where it goes without causing an echo. 

How can the massive particle called charm-quark be inside a proton? Even if its weight is higher than protons? Maybe the reason for that is in the particle-wave duality. If we think that the main mass of the proton is forming of two up and one down quarks we can see that those quarks' quantum fields are crossing in the middle of the proton. In real life, the inner structure of a proton is much more complicated than just those three quarks. 

And that thing forms charm-quark. There is the possibility. Those three crossing quantum fields form the particle that hovers inside the quantum field, which forms a proton. In that model, there are small radiation strings, that push the charm quark from both sides. So the charm quark and some other quarks send radiation from their both poles. Or from the rotating axle. 

If that thing is true this thing can cause us that we must re-estimate the weight of some material. That kind of phenomenon where radiation strings or wave motion left from rotating particles can make cosmic inflation more accurate than it was before. The direction and way how material turns to wave motion will tell about the nature of the material. 

That radiation pike is true, the wave motion. That comes from that radiation pike's direction forms a cone that travels past the object. So the wave motion that impacts that radiation pike acts like an air cone. That supersonic aircraft forms when traveling in the air. If that radiation cone doesn't touch particles, it can stay invisible. 

Material and particles are one form of energy. And wave motion can turn to the particle. So we can say that particles are a solid form of wave motion. But that thing doesn't mean that all particles are beautiful balls. Some particles might seem like eggs. 

And some others might look like a cylinder or whirl. If cylinder- or whirl shape quark is possible. That material can be invisible to the eye. The reason is that a cylinder-shaped hypothetical elementary particle pushes wave motion over it. 

That means the cylinder-shaped structure makes wave motion continue its travel in the direction where it goes. So that the roll-shaped particle tornado doesn't make an echo or wave motion that goes back to the direction where the wave motion is coming. 

That means that there might be particles that we are not seen before. If some particles are looking like cylinders or eggs that can cause cases where those particles are hard to detect. There is a possibility that a particle's form is meaning much more than we even thought. Or it doesn't mean anything. The fact is that we know many things about particles and materials. But there are lots of things that we don't know. 

Image: https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/proton-contain-charm-quark/

Could there have been UFOs in Earth's orbit in the 1950s?

Aligned, Multiple-Transient Events in the First Palomar Sky Survey could be artificial objects. Or. They could also be some light reflection...