The blimp near Mexican border.
When a person is once wrong, that doesn't mean the person is always wrong. But for some reason, we always remember only negative things. If the researcher made good research. And create fundamental things. The only mentioned thing is failures. That thing is called criticism.
But does real criticisms mean that all thing that person makes is justified as false because some of the works didn't work? Should people still notice some successful things when they analyze some people's work?
We all make mistakes. That is one reality. There is no perfect person on Earth. When some researchers make mistakes, they must analyze what caused that mistake. There is some reason for mistakes. Did they start introducing some opinions too often? Or did somebody else misunderstand the testimony?
When researchers make their work. They must analyze evidence and search for things like DNA. And if somebody shot the UFO down researchers must analyze the material captured from the crash site. Before research all conclusions are non-scientific.
There were plans in the 1990s to send balloons to search Venus and some other planet's atmospheres. So that means also balloons can have an unknown origin. Before research and analysis, it's impossible to close any possibilities away,
The media is full of stories about the "little green men", and then the astronomer's reputation is gone. People are laughing when a 150 Euro microwave oven caused a fake alarm. And then that thing is always destructive for research.
At this point, I must say one thing. Even the best researchers in the world are helpless if they cannot see the thing that jet fighters shot down. In that case, they must follow the flow of evidence that some other publications in the media.
The broken microwave ovens are objects that send radiation frequently all the time. When that radiation hits metal or some other atoms and molecules they change its frequency. But the problem is that this thing happens very often.
Spy balloons are another problematic thing. There was the story that one of those balloons was sent by some "balloon brigade". And then the good joke was that the 12 Euro balloon cheated millions of Euro's jet fighters.
The fact is that those hobbyists should tell where their balloons are flying better. The high-flying balloons are used for mapping stratospheric winds. And normally, the GPS and sticker are telling the origin of those balloons.
So that was confirmation of the origin of one of those balloons. But there were two or three more balloons. The problem with balloon spying is that those balloons can carry systems that measure signals that jet fighters and air defense use for detecting their targets.
People think that research is like reading some kind of book. If we think like that. We believe that we can take a couple of last pages from the book, and then we have the solution. When astronomers get some strange-looking "non-natural" signal.
They must confirm its existence. And that is one of the hardest things. If some of those signals happen only once there is no way to confirm them. That signal comes from the direction of Proxima Centauri doesn't mean that its origin is in the Proxima system.
In the same way the "face of Mars" is interesting. The images are somehow "interesting" because there even if they are sent using Viking frequency. That image could portray an undersea area. So did something come to the frequency that the Viking orbiter used? So does that "Cydonia image" actually portray something, that is on the ocean floor? That thing is one of the most interesting things in the world.
Image: https://www.army.mil/article/8327/aerostat_visible_over_redstone_arsenal
