A new way to control electrons opens new roads.

"Two twisted boron nitride layers (blue and pink) create a crystal lattice at a distance in which electrons (gold) can arrange themselves in a regular pattern. Credit: Natasha Kiper / ETH Zurich"

"Researchers at ETH Zurich have developed a new technique to better understand how electrons interact within materials. By using a moiré material — created by twisting ultra-thin atomic layers — they generated an artificial crystal lattice in a nearby semiconductor, allowing for more precise studies of electron behavior."

"Scientists have devised a method to create artificial crystal lattices with a large lattice constant in semiconductor materials."

"The increased lattice constant reduces the electrons’ motional energy, making their interactions more prominent."

"This technique will help researchers study electron interactions across different materials."

"A better understanding of these interactions could explain how certain insulators transition into superconductors when extra electrons are introduced"

(ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Found a Mind-Bending Way to Control Electrons)

**************************************************************

The ability to control electrons is one of the things that can boost electronics. The system can use the crystal lattice to trap and control electrons using light. The laser beam can affect lattice atoms' conductivity, and that helps to control the electrons in the lattice. In a modified tunneling microscope. 

The system operates as tweezers. It can put those electrons into their positions. In the new types of memories and quantum systems, data can be stored in electrons. If researchers want to keep data in the form of electrons they must avoid the situation where electron touches the layer. 

Theoretically, the same things that can control electrons can control positrons or antiprotons. The same system that can hover electrons in layers can make the same thing with antiprotons. In antimatter, particles have opposite polarity. And if the system uses electromagnetic force to keep them away from the layer the same system that keeps electrons away from the layer can keep antiprotons away. 

That makes it possible to control electrons and antimatter particles with very high accuracy. The system requires ion layers that can push the positron away from the lattices. The ability to store positrons in crystals and graphene can boost antimatter technology. The system must hover antimatter particles between the carbon net structures. Antimatter can have many weapons, and engine solutions. The antimatter can act as a super-power turbo-boost in chemical and ion rockets. 

It can make it possible to create extremely small ammunition. One gram of antimatter can destroy Earth. This means. A pistol-bullet-sized antimatter capsule can destroy an entire planet. The antimatter can also be used for data storage. Anti-electrons can store data and when the photonic system reads the anti-electron can be destroyed. There is the possibility to use the anti-electron-electron pair in superpositions in quantum computers. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-discovered-a-hidden-superpower-in-microscopes-thanks-to-ai/

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-found-a-mind-bending-way-to-control-electrons/

The WARP bubbles. And faster-than-light technology.

Every day neutrons travel faster than light in a short moment. That thing makes the blue shine of nuclear reactors. The same effect is used in neutrino detectors. When neutrino impacts with water it slows its speed and sends a blue-light flash. 

In some models, the future spacecraft are forming WARP bubbles underwater. The air bubble. That surrounds the craft, allowing it to travel faster than light in the water. When the craft removes the WARP bubble around it, that system allows the craft can travel faster than light in less than a second. The idea is that the system benefits the Cherenkov effect. 

Because nothing that has mass can slow immediately the craft travels faster than light underwater in a short moment. And then it can jump to the fourth dimension. The Cherenkov radiation forms when the particle that impacts water slows its speed and sends blue-light shock wave. 

There are made quantum-size and short-term WARP-bubbles in laboratories. But WARP technology is still in beta-model. In some versions, the neutrons will collide in front of the antimatter engine nozzle. And then the antimatter engine shoots the particles through those bubbles. All that is written about WARP technology tells about theoretical systems, that can make the craft travel faster than light. 

The WARP system is called Alcubierre drive. The problem is to deny the energy travel out from the craft when it reaches the speed of light. And one answer could be that the antimatter and matter would explode at the front of the craft. And that allows energy to travel to the craft's body in critical moments. 

Some versions of the theoretical  Alcubierre drive the craft to shoot antimatter- and material particles to the front of it. When that happens in the speed. That is very close to the speed of light that pumps energy inside the craft in the critical moment it allows the craft to jump to the fourth dimension. 

WARP bubbles are shove fields. That isolates the structure from its environment. The problem with this bubble's creation is to deny a couple of things. The biggest problem is that the system must deny the form of "hairs".  

The hairs are wave movement that is traveling out from the object. So the WARP bubble must be "slight". The system must make a so-called "cold" WARP bubble there is an impact wave around the electromagnetic vacuum. The problem with the hot bubble is the electromagnetic hair that causes EM friction. And this can slow the speed of the craft. 

The idea of the WARP bubble is that it allows material and photons to travel without the effect of electromagnetic wave movement or scattering effect that can slow the speed of those particles. There is the possibility. The cloud of superpositioned and entangled electrons or photons is creating a bubble around the craft.

There are a couple of hypothetical models of how to make a WARP bubble. 

1) The system can use the antimatter impact to create the electromagnetic bubble. At first, the spacecraft would surround by a ball of superpositioned and entangled particles like electrons. Then antimatter impact pushes quantum fields from around the craft. 

2) The impact of neutrons. In that model, the system uses small-size neutron balls, neutron beams, or neutron bubbles. Those things are forming similar effects with impacting neutron stars. And then those impacting neutrons are forming the WARP bubble around the craft. 

3) Making the craft very hot or high energy. In that version, the high-energy craft or its body pushes quantum fields from around it. Then the cations and anions can be pulled out from the craft by using magnets. 

4) The WARP bubble can form underwater. In that model, the air bubble is forming the bubble where ions, electrons, and photons travel faster than in water. Then the system must just remove the WARP bubble from around that object. That makes the craft travel faster than light in water in less than a second. So could that time be enough to jump that craft to the fourth dimension? 

In some other models, the system uses skyrmions for that purpose. Then the antimatter explosion pushes quantum fields out from the structure. And then the network of superpositioned and entangled particles are closing outside quantum fields away from the bubble. There is a total vacuum in the WARP bubble. And there all particles could travel at the same speed. 

There are some models where the craft uses WARP bubbles for only a short moment. When the craft reaches a speed, that is the same as photons in an absolute vacuum it removes WARP-bubble from around it. That thing causes a similar effect that causes Cherenkov radiation. 

The idea is that the craft would drop away from the third dimension in that case. So when the craft accelerates to the highest possible speed and the WARP bubble is removed the impact energy turns that thing into a black hole or makes it jump to the fourth dimension. 

In some other models, the rocket engine that is used in spacecraft forms the WARP bubble to the front of the antimatter engine nozzle. Then the particles would shoot through that thing. That allows them to travel faster than usual. 

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/329631-scientists-havent-created-a-warp-bubble-but-theyre-a-bit-closer-to-testing-one

https://www.fanaticalfuturist.com/2022/02/worlds-first-real-warp-bubble-created-by-accident-as-scientists-mull-future-warp-drive/

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-is-cherenkov-radiation

https://phys.org/news/2017-01-alcubierre-warp.html

https://phys.org/news/2015-11-dont-superluminal-einstein-universe.html

https://www.space.com/real-uss-enterprise

https://theconversation.com/new-warp-drive-research-dashes-faster-than-light-travel-dreams-but-reveals-stranger-possibilities-158070

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation 

Project West Ford. When the U.S. planned to make an artificial ionosphere.

The U.S. attempted to create an artificial ionosphere around the world. By using 480 000 000 copper needles. Those very small copper needles would act as dipole antennas that mirror radio waves back to Earth. As we know Project West ford failed. And the U.S. made the largest number of space debris. That ever created. Project West Ford was one of the good ideas. But the technology that the U.S. used was the wrong type. Making an artificial ionosphere could be possible by using a large number of tesla coils.

What if NASA would shot drawing pins to the orbiter? If those drawing pins are at the same level. They would act as the tesla coils. That is making the radio wave dome between drawing pin antennas. 

Image 2) Tesla coils.

There are some theoretical models that Project West Ford could be successful if the used needles would look like drawing pins. The drawing pins must lock precisely at the same level. And then the radar impulses will target them. 

The hats of those drawing pins would act as tesla coins. When radar impulses hit those drawing pins they would create a network of radio waves between them. Those radio waves would turn to jump between drawing pin antennas. And then they can reflect the radio waves to Earth. This kind of system can use to create an artificial ionosphere for the moon or mars. 

The clouds or plates of those antennas would put in trajectory around those space objects. Then the radio waves can put to jump from that dome to Moon or Mars. These kinds of visions are exciting. But the problem is that those things are increasing the number of space debris. 

https://www.livescience.com/46745-how-tesla-coil-works.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_West_Ford

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Maybe in the future, supercomputer centers can have human-looking robots under command.

Maybe in the future, supercomputer centers can have human-looking robots under command. The purpose of those robots is to make repairs in those systems. And their mission is also to protect those high-power computers against attacks.

There is a vision of robotics and their interaction with supercomputers. The idea is that the supercomputers might have external bodies or remote-control robots that serve those machines. The idea is that those robot bodies are making repairings for those machines. That thing makes it possible that the industrial- and other secrets of those machines are easier to keep safe. 

Those physical robots are also acting as communication tools between supercomputers and humans. The idea for those robot middlemen between supercomputers and humans is taken from the Alien movies, where human-looking robots are acting as middlemen between spacecraft and their crews. 

Do you remember "Sophia" an interactive AI test robot from the year 2016? What would that robot make with Chat GPT?

Sophia  was or still is one of the most fundamental development tools for AI. The robot itself does not need powerful computers because Sophia can connect with the supercomputers by using wireless networks. 

That makes this kind of robot safe. Cutting communications makes robots unable to operate. And that means Sophia  itself is like some kind of cell phone that the AI uses to communicate with people. Sometimes I wonder what "Sophia" would do if it's connected with the Chat GPT AI-communication software. The Chat GPT would give a boost to that system. 

The thing is that the artificial organic neurons that are almost like human neurons can change the game in robotics. The ability to clone neurons is the thing that makes independently operating robots closer to reality than ever before. Those artificial neurons are making it possible to create an artificial brain that can learn things like the human brain. 

And even if that kind of system might be in the future. They are a reality someday in the future. There are two lines that those systems can be. 

Living neurons can control robots externally. Or researchers can install those neurons in the robot's body. That thing makes it possible to create the biggest opportunity and same time the biggest threat that humans ever created. 

https://scitechdaily.com/artificial-organic-neurons-created-almost-like-biological-nerve-cells/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_(robot)

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

Drones are deadly weapons.

Shahed-136

The Ukrainian war shows how effective tool drone is. The Russian air defense could destroy all Beyraktar drones. But before that, the Bayraktars terminated lots of Russian equipment and men. So the efficiency of those drones is good. 

Another name for loitering ammunition or kamikaze drones is cruise missiles. The problem is that almost anybody can make the kamikaze drone at home. Basically kamikaze drone is an RC airplane that carries explosives. 

There are also anti-tank versions of those loitering ammunition. Those versions are just artillery recon drones or target drones equipped with suitable warheads. 

And even if Russian air defense destroyed them.  Those drones played a big role at the beginning of the war. Today we see how effective cheap Iranian drones are against fixed Ukrainian targets.

Lucky for Ukraine, Shahed-136 drones are very primitive. They can fly by using fixed routes. And they don't even change altitudes. 

Shahed-136 cannot make any escape and evasion movements. So when that drone is located. It's quite easy to shoot down. 

And even if Ukrainian air defense shoots most of those slow drones. A couple of them are reaching targets. This is the key element in drone operation, lots of cheap drones can send at the same time, against multiple targets. The maximum speed of those drones is about 150 km/h. Even if those drones are easy to reach by using a car or combat helicopter. And they are easy to destroy. 

A large number of those loitering ammunition guarantees that some of them reach the target. Drones are like all other aircraft. They are hard to see but easy to destroy if the ammunition hits them. The new anti-aircraft missiles are effective against drones. But the problem is that they must see drones before they can be used. 

Black Hornet

The price of effective missiles like Patriot is 3 million per shot. Their target price is less than 3000 dollars. The number of lost drones in missions in 2020 was 24. And it increased. But then. The high command can accept the loss of 24 drones because no friendly crews were dangered. 

The low price of the GPS systems means that the cheap mobile telephone can modify the brain of those drones. And GPS/GLONASS guarantees high enough accuracy that those drones can destroy or damage oil refineries, power plants, transformer substations, factories, and other large structures. 

The small drones that Ukrainians use against Russian infantry and armored vehicles are also very effective. Those drones are just little modified versions of drones that people can buy from supermarkets. 

Those drones are equipped with systems that can drop hand grenades at enemy positions. Sometimes those hand grenades slipped into tanks from the open hatches. And that destroyed those tanks. If those small-size drones are equipped with thermobaric hand grenades the lethal radius of those bombs is 30 meters. 

The Ukrainian military also used pocket-size killer drones that can take off individual shooters. In the wrong hands, those pocket-size drones can cause a big risk to national security. They can leave in position. And then those drones can attack their targets. The small miniature drones can control by using satellite data transmission. And those drones are giving ICBM missiles the ability to kill individual people from the streets. 

The killer drones and loitering ammunition can have similar target recognition and attack capacity as Javelin missiles. There are multiple different drone variants in use. Some drones are equipped with similar radiation-homing equipment with HARM (High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles). This makes them effective against radio transmitters. That kind of drone can destroy any radio source. 

Switchblade

The thing that makes drones dangerous is advancing technology. When we think that a 60 € mobile telephone can give drones the same accuracy that made in the 1990s by using equipment that cost millions of Euros, we must concern about the future. The reason for that is. All models that we made against drones are old fashion. 

Image recognition systems are giving drones pinpoint accuracy. And the first supersonic drones are in use. AI-controlled weapons are under development. And the fact is that the fear that Russia or China will be first is making other nations create new terminator weapons. If those international contracts limit that development, we are in big trouble. 

International contracts limit many things like the development of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. But those weapons are under development. 

International laws prohibit things like extortion. But somehow, those cases happen quite often. Drones are big ammo over the battlefield. If we think, that some country loses 24 tanks in the mission, that is not the end of the tank. In the case of war, we must realize that somebody doesn't care about contracts. 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/10/17/what-are-kamikaze-drones-and-how-did-they-get-to-ukraine

https://www.flightglobal.com/military-uavs/record-number-of-uav-shoot-downs-prompt-new-usaf-tactics-and-countermeasure-pod/138908.article

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-what-are-iranian-kamikaze-drones-and-will-the-us-send-the-deadly-mq-9-reaper-12737283

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/drone-assassins-micro-killing-machine/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AeroVironment_Switchblade

https://yle.fi/a/74-20011489

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Google gave "code red" because of Chat GPT.

Artificial intelligence is the next thing in networks and ICT. The thing called Economical Darwinism means that in the world of business. The competition for survivability is so tough like it's in nature. In that competition, the ability to create new solutions to give response to new challenges is the thing that determines the fate of the company. 

AI is a tool that will change the world forever. And if companies cannot give response to that thing, it makes the end of the business. When we think about AI we must realize that the past is past. We cannot return to the past. The next-generation tools are determining the success of the future business. 

The fate of companies that cannot create new things and flex are facing the fate of dinosaurs. Big size doesn't mean anything. And wealthy businesses are gone in seconds if people choose some other service. When we think about AI and its abilities, we must realize that traditional search engines are history quite soon. 

 AI, and "the internet of things". 

AI will be the next-generation tool. And the networked AI is the thing that makes the "Internet of things" a reality. In the future, 3D printers. That connected to AI can make customized merchandise for each customer. Interactive AI-controlled systems like cars can deliver information on how their tires can behave on asphalt. 

Same way. The AI can use surveillance cameras. And search what kind of clothes can resist water and dirt. The system searches for similar clothes and their materials from the net. Then the AI can introduce the best materials and forms in certain types of clothes, and when somebody orders those clothes from the net. The system requires the size of the person. And then robots are making those clothes as customized work for the customer. 

The system that measures a person can be the scanner that used 3D infrared and terahertz scanner. The scanner can be in a shopping center, and the person can just step into the chamber where the measurement happens. And then that data will deliver to the network store that gives orders to the manufacturing platform. 

When a person makes an order. The only things that the system asks for are color and the use of the clothes. Then it shows different models of the virtual person. And then the manufacturing platform makes those clothes. 

One of the threats is that students will use AI to make their thesis. That threat seems very artificial. The reason for that is students can copy their thesis from the net or ask somebody else to make a thesis that they introduce to their teachers and opponents. 

The thing that uncovers fraud is that the student doesn't know the topics in that thesis. If we think that some student uses AI to make their work the situation is the same as somebody else making that thing for a student. So AI is only one outsider actor in that dirty business. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/google-management-issues-code-red-over-chatgpt-report-2022-12?r=US&IR=T

Image: https://www.sentinelassam.com/editorial/artificial-intelligence-in-libraries/

https://scienveandtechnoblog.wordpress.com/2022/12/30/google-gave-code-red-because-of-chat-gpt/

The fusion is waiting for its big breakthrough. But should we research that thing anyway,

Above: A fusion reactor. 

Fusion is the greatest opportunity in human history when we think about energy production. But the road to real, commercial fusion energy will be long. And it requires lots of research. When we are looking at history, we are facing many things that seem impossible or fantasy. And then someday, those things turned into real things. 

The list of those "impossible things" is long. It includes things like aircraft, moon trips, wireless telecommunication, pocket computers, portable internet, nuclear bombs, and many other things like nanotechnology. The thing is that we must realize that yesterday's science fiction is tomorrow's reality.

 But we must realize one thing about fusion energy. That is not the only way to produce energy without pollution. Western society requires energy. Everything that we have runs on electricity. And that means we need trusted energy sources. That energy sources must work is also in crisis. 

Image 2) The first liquid-fuel rocket from 1926. 

Image 3) Modern rocket. (Delta IV (Medium))

The fact about fusion energy is that even if the reactor delivers more energy than it uses the commercial use of that kind of reactor is not possible. 

If a reactor uses as an example 130 megawatts and delivers 130,01 megawatts. That also means that the reactor produces more energy than it uses. But the efficiency of the reactor is very poor. Relation between input and output is the key to creating profitable systems. 

Even if the system delivers more energy than it uses. And the numbers are impressive. We must realize one thing. The fusion reactor uses lots of energy for creating conditions where fusion is possible. And there is a long journey to the commercial fusion systems. 

But people who work with that thing are the world's most educated physicists and engineers. History showed that all troubles can be a win. If there is the will to make something. The fact is that someday, we will have a bright future. Fusion energy will be the energy form of the future. But it requires lots of work. 

Same way if we think about things like space rockets and remember the beginning of the space era. The earliest rockets did not seem very impressive. Who would believe in 1926, when Robert Goddard made his first rocket that used liquid fuel (Image 2) that the same technology would take people to the moon? 

At this point, I must say that Goddard didn't invent rockets. Rockets were invented in China a long time before Goddard. Those ancient Chinese rockets used gunpowder as fuel. Maybe that rocket is not very impressive but Goddard's invention was a pathfinder for rockets. That are transporting satellites to the orbiter. In rocket technology, Goddard didn't invent the rocket itself. The inventors of the rockets are ancient Chinese. 

Researchers in NIF(National Ignition Facility)  and other fusion laboratories have not invented fusion. Or they have not invented a method to create artificial fusion. The fusion of so-called hydrogen bombs is known from the 1950s. But making a controlled fusion reactor is far more difficult than making bombs. This is an interesting thing. Making destruction is easier than making something productive. 

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v15/154

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket

Are killer robots the banality of evil? Or a necessary evil?

The human race is the most violent species on Earth. And our greatest pleasure is to create new methods to kill people. 

The newest things on the battlefield are autonomous killer robots. So are those robots moral or ethical systems? The thing is that. We can ask the same thing about machine guns and ICBM missiles, long-range sniper rifles, and all military systems. 

The war in Ukraine brought another question about ethics in warfare. How moral and ethical situation is war? Is it ethical and moral action that some country attacks its neighbors? All nations have the right to defend themselves and their citizens. 

When we talk about law enforcement. There is no international law that limits the systems used in those missions. The problem is that police work is not an as easy thing, as people believe.

Many times each year in the global environment police officers shoot the wrong person. When a police officer goes on their mission and gets an alarm the problem is stress. If a police officer sees a person with a gun, they must think that the gun is right. 

Sometimes people are saying that AI is racist. It targets black people as thieves more often than white people. But the question about the cases where that ethnical background causes the body check is we forget one thing. Did those details or descriptions come from the AI?  

Would police check those people anyway? Or did AI recognize those people from some other crimes? 

Some people say that killer robot are less ethical than humans. But then we must ask, does it make any difference to target the ammunition that kills the person that comes from the rifle that holds the human or robot? 

We must also think about these kinds of questions must think about before we can make any decisions about those systems. The robot weapons are one weapon system in multiple weapon systems. 

And then we must remember that war is not fair game. The name of game in war is how to kill people effectively. And that thing is the biggest in warfare. 

The fact is that small states can get more benefits from killer robots than other countries. The killer robots are part of the advancement that changed the killer chain to the killer net. 

And the biggest benefit of killer robots makes them the biggest threat. Robots never excuse their orders. That means robot soldiers or killer robots are horrible tools in the wrong hands. But then we must understand that tanks and missiles with commandoes are also horrible things in the wrong hands. 

F/A-18 fires AGM-88 HARM

But also, commando that comes from war can rob the bank. And that is also a big threat. 

But the fact is that robot soldiers or the c robot soldiers' controllers are far easier to control than human soldiers. The controller doesn't need military training at all. And things like EMP weapons can destroy robots without harming humans. 

The military world is fast morphing environment. It's the race between an improved attacker and an improved defender. Things that are in use today. Are the same as they were in the First and Second World Wars. 

But things like modern tanks are far ahead of  WWII tanks. Their ability to interconnect their systems with other platforms like drones, guided ammunition, and AI is making it possible that traditional systems cannot give respond to those intelligent systems. Intelligent grenades can shoot over barriers and the enemy cannot respond to that kind of weapon. But that requires that intelligent systems work as they should. 

There are plasmoid weapons under development that should lock the GPS. That plasma system also locks all radio communication. 

The GPS jammers are already in use. The fact is that the jammer systems use radio transmissions which makes them vulnerable against AGM-88 HARM-type missiles. Those anti-radiation missiles can use to destroy drone controllers. 

Anti-radiation missiles can destroy all personnel who use radios. 

Developers created those missiles originally to use against radar stations. But they can also be home to any radio source like mobile telephones. 

There is the possibility that some loitering ammunition has a radiation-homing warhead. That means that when somebody uses a radio in the area where that kind of system operates. That radar-homing kamikaze drone will dive against that point immediately when it sees radio waves. 

The triangular measurement-based systems can find jammer systems quite easily.  And opponents can destroy land-based systems by using artillery. There could already be radar or radiation-homing grenades that can use against radio transmitters. As well as AGM-88 HARM missiles can destroy also moving headquarters. 

The next-generation GPS systems are immune to traditional jammers. The idea is that the tank or some other vehicle points laser rays to a photo-recon satellite or aircraft. That airborne system will send the image to that vehicle where it can locate itself. 

Then the crew can search for targets from those images. The system can measure the distance and location between the vehicle and the target by using triangular measurement. 

Do you speak extraterrestrial?

If we someday make contact with real aliens the biggest problem is the language barrier. But are things like UFOs extraterrestrial? The fact is that those "aliens" and UFOs can be robots. And before somebody captures those things, nobody knows their origin.  NASA says that UFO:s origin is on Earth, but they are not confessing to investigate any captured alien or UFO. So they cannot be sure about their builder, so the origin of those strange things remains a mystery. 

In some hypotheses, aliens are time travelers from the future. In that model of those theories, in those theories, the particle accelerator is around the UFO. That system dilates time in those mystery objects. 

(https://www.space.com/aliens-time-traveling-humans-ufo-hypothesis.html)

Researchers must keep their eyes and mind open. And they must not close any possibilities away before they can see the evidence. And because no government confesses to owning UFO. Or nobody claims to capture the so-called unidentified aerial phenomenon. Those things are a mystery. And before researchers can investigate real captured UFOs we cannot straight close the alien connection away.

The AI-controlled spacecraft can travel across interstellar space. But those systems can also build in very advanced laboratories. 

So are UFOs and aliens AI-controlled robots?

In this text term, alien means a man-shaped thing that origin is unknown. So that aliens can be 

Man, 

Man-made robot

Alien 

Alien made robot

 When we are talking about UFOs and so-called grey aliens we must realize one thing. Those creatures can be extremely advanced probes. Or some kind of recon robots controlled by artificial intelligence. So in that case, UFOs and robot aliens could not even tell where they are coming from. But then we must realize one thing if we want to communicate with aliens. 

We should talk about their language. Or aliens must talk some Earth language. And because nobody even knows where those aliens are coming from the ability to communicate with them is very difficult. And first, we must detect the speech in their voices. And that is extremely difficult. 

The thing, that makes aliens interesting is that they are given many ideas for nanomachines and other technology. In some theories, the alien robots are the test or some kind of recon units that use advanced nanotechnology. 

There is the possibility to make a robot whose entire body is formed of DNA  or some spring-shape molecules like protein talin. There are some servo-engines or some more advanced systems that can control the motions of those systems. That kind of robot can have the ability to turn itself into a liquid form. 

And slip in buildings from the minimum holes. If that kind of DNA-based robot exists. It could infect other organisms by using DNA bites. That kind of robot can have multiple brains or neural control microchips. This networked hybrid system makes this hypothetical nanomaterial-cyborg intelligent. Those systems would not be living or dead. 

https://www.loc.gov/collections/finding-our-place-in-the-cosmos-with-carl-sagan/articles-and-essays/life-on-other-worlds/ufos-and-aliens-among-us

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/

https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/ufo-hunters-got-one-thing-right-here-s-what-they-ncna834306

https://phys.org/news/2022-10-nasa-people-ufos-naturaland-isnt.html

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a40665405/are-ufos-time-traveling-humans/

https://scitechdaily.com/do-you-speak-extraterrestrial/

https://www.space.com/aliens-time-traveling-humans-ufo-hypothesis.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ufos