Showing posts with label gravitational effect. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gravitational effect. Show all posts

Saturday, August 23, 2025

What if all we thought about dark matter is wrong?

  What if all we thought about dark matter is wrong? 


Above: Cosmic gamma-ray background.

So, what makes gravitational waves and gravitational fields move? That is the key question in dark matter research. There are suggestions that the gravitational effect that we know as “dark matter” can be quantum-sized black holes, or some kind of particles like axions. The problem is that nobody has seen any axion yet. And if somebody says that the still hypothetical free graviton particles are the thing that forms dark matter, the next question is: what are gravitons? Are they quantum-size black holes?

Gravitons are theoretical gravitation transporter particles. Those particles are things that cause gravitational waves moving. But another thing is that dark matter can be anything that we can imagine. The only known fact is this: there is some kind of gravitational effect whose origin is unknown. 

All four fundamental interactions are some kind of radiation. And each of those interactions has its own individual wavelength. Each fundamental interaction, gravity, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, and electromagnetism, has its own individual radiation type. 

Then we can think about the shape of materia. The particle is like a whisk. The strings that form the particle shell have a certain height. When a particle spins, it binds energy into it as kinetic energy. Sometimes a particle’s energy level turns higher than its environment. And in that moment particle sends waves. Those waves’ wavelength is the same as the particle’s diameter. But the height of those strings also causes limits in that interaction. Strings on the particle’s shell touch the field. Those strings are like flaps on paddlewheels. Their height determines the wave types that the particle can bind to. If those strings are high, that particle can bind a longer wavelength. 

There is one rule for interaction. Radiation or water must have access between those flaps. If the paddlewheel or propeller spins too fast, that causes an effect called supercavitation. The water has no time to fall between those flaps or between the propeller’s blades, which causes the paddle wheel or propeller to spin in a bubble. And that causes an interesting hypothesis. 

Could there be a particle that spins so fast that it causes supercavitation in the quantum fields? Can some particle spin so fast that it can make a cavitation bubble in the gravitational field? If that particle exists, that means gravitation will not affect that particle. Gravitation affects that particle’s quantum bubble. But it doesn’t affect the particle itself like other particles. If particle groups like hadrons spin very fast, their quarks can turn into a straight row. 

That spin can cause a situation where quantum fields or radiation travel to the axle of that particle row. And that can make the particle a hard target for observers. Fast spin can also throw radiation past the particle. This makes it invisible. But can that thing be possible with elementary particles? And can some particle throw gravitational radiation, or gravitational waves, past it? That causes an effect where gravitational waves slide over particles without causing interaction. But can this be true? Heaven knows. 

And in that case. Longer wavelengths. Like electromagnetism covers other, shorter wavelenght below them. That means electromagnetic force covers weak and strong nuclear forces. And gravity below it. If something pulls the G-field into something, that field pulls other fields to that particle. 

There is a possibility to press all parts of an atom into one entirety called a singularity. The reason why we cannot see the singularity is that its so smooth. Those superstrings on its surface are so low that they can bind only short-wave radiation. That means the particle will be surrounded by the standing gravity field. The singularity harnesses the G-field that transports other fields to the singularity.  How long will that singularity remain? As long as the outside fields can press that thing into one entirety. 

But there is a possibility that if the particle spins very fast. That causes a situation where longer wavelengths have no time to fall between those strings. That means the extremely fast-spinning particle drives fields past it like a stealth aircraft. The idea is that the G-field is the shortest wave radiation, and the fastest spinning objects can cause a situation where the only thing that can interact with that particle is the G-field. The G-field is the only thing that has time to fall between those strings. 

This causes another very interesting question. Can there be a so fast-spinning particle that even the gravity field, or G-field, has no time to fall between those strings? If that kind of particle exists. That would be the revolution for physics. 


https://www.space.com/astronomy/dark-universe/what-if-weve-been-thinking-about-dark-matter-all-wrong-scientist-wonders


Friday, January 6, 2023

The dark matter mystery.





In some theories, the Big Bang was the Schwinger effect which turned wave movement into particle-antiparticle pairs. The Big Bang was the annihilation that destroyed and reformed particles. A small asymmetry in the relation of particles caused the situation that the material that we know as material forms the universe. 

This thing is interesting because the Schwinger effect always forms the same number of particles and antiparticles. So where came those extra particles that formed material? 

The Big Bang was probably a series of events where material transformed into energy, and again energy transformed back into the material. But then we must realize that dark matter must come from somewhere. Dark matter is a mystery. In the young universe, there was lots of dark matter. And then dark energy replaced dark matter as the most dominating force in the universe. 




There is a possibility. That in the early universe was some type of material that is lost today. That explains why in the young universe was no dark energy. But there was more dark matter. Cosmic inflation explains why the density of dark matter decreases, but what is the origin of free or dark energy that causes the universe's expansion? 

Cosmic inflation means that material density comparison with space decreases. The idea is similar when the balloon is put in a vacuum chamber. The vacuum pulls the balloon larger. 

And the pressure inside it is decreasing. Problem is that the cosmic inflation theory requires that the universe's acceleration speed increases. 

The reason for that is when the distance between objects increases gravitational effect between them decreases. But that thing does not seem quite right. The expansion speed of the universe doesn't accelerate. Or it accelerates less than it should.  

Is the origin of dark energy the annihilation between unknown particle-antiparticle pairs? That means dark energy is an echo from the particles, destroyed a long time ago. 

If we think that the Big Bang formed two or three types of material. That might have no other interaction than gravitation.  In some models, the Big Bang released three types of matter. 


1)Cold Dark matter ********************1)Cold Dark matter

2)Hot Dark matter*******'** or********* 2)Visible material

3)Visible material *********************3)Hot dark matter


Even if dark matter consists of two versions of hot and cold dark matter, that doesn't mean that hot and cold dark matter has a stronger interaction than hot and cold dark matter and visible material. 

There is a possibility that visible matter is between cold and hot dark matter. The existence of hot and cold dark matter is not confirmed. But if visible material is between the hot and cold dark matter. That means dark matter interaction goes through the visible matter. So if that thing is true could the dark energy be the result of that unproven interaction? 

If visible material is between cold and dark matter that means the dark matter forms a giant maser effect in the universe. The idea in that model is that before the "real Big Bang" happened that event released dark matter. 

Then the ring of visible material is released, and finally, another wave of dark matter is released into the universe. That model is taken from nuclear bombs where lots of radiation is released just before the weapon explodes. 

The fact is that. Dark matter is not proven to be material at all. In some visions, the dark matter is some kind of gravitational maser effect. But that thing is very hard to prove. We know that there is some kind of gravitational effect whose source is unknown. And that's almost everything that we know about dark matter. 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)


https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Could there have been UFOs in Earth's orbit in the 1950s?

Aligned, Multiple-Transient Events in the First Palomar Sky Survey could be artificial objects. Or. They could also be some light reflection...