Is reality exists?

  Is reality exists? 

Does the subjective experience make reality more or less exists? In some models, reality forms in the future, and at the point where we and time flow crossing, reality turns things that we can observe. Everything that we see happens in past. The time that photons take to travel from 200 meters away is minimum. But even in that kinds of cases, we see things that happen in the past. Things like fog and other disturbances affect information even in a short moment. 

The information that we get is not identical. The position and other things between two observers affect their way see things. Different experiences also affect people's feelings. And those things affect the way to see a thing. When two people are standing near some object and another of them has a strong negative experience connected with that object, that person sees it differently than the person whose experiences are neutral. 

Reality is a subjective experience. 

Reality is one of the things that we don't know. We know that something exists. Things like electrons are well-known things. But we cannot see that thing. We read those things from the net and books. 

Things like our personal experiences are modeling our relationship with reality. When we see something we cannot be sure, does some other actor got the same feelings about it? All our senses participate in forming of reality that we sense. But there are different ways to see things. 

In some models, reality is an illusion. That is formed in our brains. We know that absolute reality does not exist The position and senses of the observer determine how we see reality. And the ability to communicate between observers also limits sharing of information. If we are not telling everything to another person something is missing. 

So how can we say that another person feels and sees things the same way as we see them? And even the best description cannot transmit the entirety of our feelings to another observer. Full entirety means that we can transmit also things how we feel about those things. Sense of touch and sense of taste is hard to describe. That means we cannot feel and taste everything the same way. 

The AI can answer questions. But it doesn't realize what it answers. 

That thing makes AI problematic. If we ask for something kinetic or absolute from the AI that thing can tell many things about that thing. Kinetic things are like the technical details of Formula 1. The AI can tell colors and engine horsepower. But things like opinions, for example, which one is better, chicken or vegetable hamburger, or do you like heavy metal or classical music cause problems to AI. The reason for that is that AI doesn't have an opinion. 

The AI can say that it cannot tell opinions. But the problem is that the AI follows algorithms. Algorithms are program codes that describe how the AI must act in certain situations. So if the AI doesn't recognize the question about opinions it can start to find the answer from the net, by using certain parameters. And one parameter can be which pizza or which music gender is higher in order or listen to list. 

So the situation is similar as we will ask people which is the best hamburger, and then we can say that the best hamburger is the hamburger that is the most often bought. In that case, we can make elections and vote on many things, but that thing doesn't tell anything about our personal opinions about that question. 

The fact is that the AI cannot detect if the information is false. If somebody hijacks the sensors that the AI uses that thing means that AI cannot detect data coming from the camera or some other source like a high-resolution screen. 

There is no true or false data. There is only data. 

When we handle data. We must realize that our brain doesn't know if data is true or false. The thing is that data itself is just data. That means our brains and consciousness don't automatically suspect data is false or true. These kinds of processes are the result of training. 

When we see the object created by using a hologram machine, we can say that the object exists. It exists as a hologram. In that case, we have no responsibility if we describe the object as reality. If somebody introduces a hologram as a real object. And we cannot touch it. We have the right to believe that object is real. 

There are two images in this text. I took those images in the same place and the same place. The focus in those images is adjusted differently, and that makes those images different looking. The purpose of those images is to demonstrate how the difference in senses affects how we see reality. 

Lots of existence is out of our ability to observe it. 

An object is a reality in the form of a hologram. As I just wrote. But then we must realize that the reality. What we see is only a small part of our existence. We see only a shell of material. Nobody has ever seen the nucleus of the atom without extremely advanced systems. Same way as we see only a small part of icebergs. We see only a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

So that means there are lots of things that we can never observe without equipment like infrared or X-ray telescopes. Every year we find another part of reality. Reality does not exist in absolute form. We know that we see something, and the same way things, like insects, see something. But then we must ask: does the insect realize what it sees? 

In the insect's brains is two modes: hit or run. If an insect sees something it recognizes the object. If the object is food or a partner the insect goes near it. And if an insect sees something else it escapes. But in our brains is many other possibilities. Reality is something interesting to us. We might see many things, but because we don't always react outsiders cannot see, what we see. And another thing is outsiders cannot see how our brains modify things that senses bring to the cortex. 

Plato's cave is an example of selective information. 

Plato's cave is an example of selective information. Or brains are always selective because their capacity is limited. And they select things that they store. Everything that happens to the carrier of those brains happens just to that individual. 

This is the thing that makes every experience unique. If we see that some other person falls we cannot feel that thing in our own body. That's why we always react differently to things that happen to somebody else than we react to things that happen to us. This is why all experiences are somehow subjective. 

Reality is always subjective. If we would spend our entire life in some room and VR (Virtual Reality) masks are on our faces, and we ever go outside. We can think that reality is what we see on those screens. If we spend all our lives in one room, we can think that everything is like in that room. That room is our entire world. 

We can make that room a virtual reality without any VR systems. If we ever can go outside and we cannot see anybody else than some servants, all the information that we can get depends on what those people are telling us. 

The fact is that this is a high-tech version of Plato's cave. In that model, somebody controls everything that we see. The Internet could be the big Plato's cave if we just search for information that pleases us. If somebody covers the entire planet by using screens that allow that actor to deny that there are no other things in the universe except that planet. 

The thing is that even the biggest of Plato's caves are. Places where people get subjective information. People who use the internet are easy to blame for that thing. But even if we travel to distant countries we can select the information we want to see and feel. We can go to some country and then sit in a taxi or tourist bus and spend all time in a hotel. Would we get the right or diverse information about the country? 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-our-reality-may-be-a-sum-of-all-possible-realities-20230206/

Can graviton be two particles?

If we think the theory that that graviton is two particles (like neutrinos). They are orbiting each other so graviton is like positronium, where positron and electron are orbiting each other. This explains why black holes can explode. 

This thing also explains the strange nature of gravitation. In the middle of that particle-pair would be electromagnetic- or quantum low pressure that pulls the quantum field inside it from outside. 

Those particles could also be virtual particles like quantum whirls that are orbiting each other. So virtual particles can act like real particles. And things like black holes can form stable quantum whirls inside them. 

Those particles that are rotating each other can form the quantum tower. A string or wave movement travels in the quantum tower and acts like a heat pump. When it touches other quantum fields it takes a part of them with it. That causes the interaction that keeps the quantum tower in one piece. 

If those particles that are forming graviton will be in series, that thing creates a deeper quantum tunnel through that particle series. The depth of that tunnel determines the level of gravitation. If we would put those rotating particle pairs in a line or row, we could make a very powerful power source. 

When that quantum tunnel stretches the quantum field through it that quantum field interacts with other particles. And it pumps energy into those particle pairs. The requirement that those particle pairs can stay in one entirety is that the virtual particle or electromagnetic low-pressure in the middle of those particles is stable. 

If a graviton is two particles that rotate each other that thing means there is a hole or tunnel in the black hole. That tunnel explains the radiation pike that leaves from the black hole. And then when the energy level of that particle pair increases they send radiation to both sides of them. When that radiation hits the event horizon, that can explain the gravitational waves. 

Above: "An electron and positron orbiting around their common center of mass. An s state has zero angular momentum, so orbiting around each other would mean going straight at each other until the pair of particles is either scattered or annihilated, whichever occurs first. This is a bound quantum state known as positronium" (Wikipedia/positronium). Can some other elementary particles act like electron-positron pair called positronium?

Or there is another very interesting version of the black hole's structure. In that model, the black hole is a WARP bubble. That is this: the black hole is a series of particle pairs that rotate each other. That structure is in the WARP bubble. The WARP-bubble that allows those particle pairs (gravitons) to orbit each other at a speed that is almost over the speed of light. 

The speed of those rotating particle pairs changes. And the reason for that is: that those particles rotate each other with the maximum speed that denies their touch with quantum fields. 

At that moment, the particle pairs will send radiation known as gravitational waves or gravitational radiation. And when the energy level of the black hole decreases its rotating speed decreases. At that moment the outside quantum field pumps energy to that black hole. There is a small electromagnetic vacuum around the standing wave movement that travels out from the black hole's poles. 

The thing that keeps the quantum tower where those particle pairs are rotating in one structure is the quantum low pressure between those particle pairs. When that string or wave movement travels in that quantum tower it pulls wave movement with it. And that thing causes the electromagnetic low pressure between those particle pairs. 

If that low pressure is gone the particle pair explodes. Or that energy load separates that particle-pair. When the level of energy. That travels in that quantum structure turns higher. The distance between those particles expands. 

And then, if that energy pumping ends. That causes the particle pair will be separated. This thing explains the explosion of the black hole. In this model, there is a hole or some kind of tunnel in the black hole. If that tunnel turns too large it explodes the black hole. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Where do we need scholars?

Mysteries are fascinating things. And without mysteries are no scholars, and sometimes some people tell a joke that scholars are behind some mysteries because we want to keep our jobs.

Jokes are a good argument for crushing researchers. Press introduced  Charles Darwin as a monkey when he introduced the evolution theory. That thing was very nice because a couple of hundred years earlier that man would burn on the bonfire. 

The best receipt is that tell people that all mysteries are urban legends, and then after that, some jokes about the researcher's mental health make an impression. 

If we follow that track, we face the argument:  humans invented all things, that we can. And we don't need anything new. And everything that we can find is found. So that's why we don't need any new things. We can solve all things by taking assault rifles in our hands and that's it. If there is some Big Foot in the forest we can shoot it. And there is no BigFoot anymore. But does that remove the mystery? 

Maybe that thing is right. Or maybe, it's wrong. But when we are looking at a mystery, we must research one thing. We must find out what makes those things mysterious. 

If we read some books. That tells about mysteries. We must try, to find out why the writer selected just those certain cases for that book. What category did that writer use? And what is the writer's or document maker's attitude about those things that the person introduces to people? 

Does the writer or filmmaker leave space for the audience? That they can make their conclusions? And does the storyteller offer them a chance to discuss and talk about their opinions? Or is the story's purpose just to curve the opponent's opinion for some mold that the document maker wants them to get? 

When we think of the sad series of researchers that says "certainly that is impossible", we must realize one thing. When people make some conclusions, they must use information. That they have at that precise moment. 

The observation tools are advancing, and some things are changing. So we must avoid too strong opinions because if we take some attitude and defend it very strongly we are in a psychological trap. 

That trap is that someday we all face the situation that we are wrong. And at that moment, we must say that we are wrong. We know that we should know something. But even if something remains theory let's say about 100 years the new observation tool can prove that theory right or wrong. 

When somebody selects a certain path or road and publically tells that thing. There is somehow very difficult to select a new path. Because that requires that our person must confess being wrong. And that is very hard if a person is afraid to lose authority.

Sometimes people misunderstand the difference between leadership and scholarship. They think that scholarship and leadership are the same things.  Scholars observe some phenomenon or object and try to make a puzzle and find out what that thing makes and how the parts of the entirety interact.  Leaders can use that information, or they can leave that information outside decision-making. That's their business. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

"UFO project" from the past.

Images at the top: 

1) Leonardo's aviation machine

2) Leonardo's fighting vehicle 

3) Leonardo's helicopter or aerial screw. 

4) Leonardo's ballista or great crossbow. 

The most well-known aviation project from the past is Leonardo da Vinci's flying machine. Sometimes researchers say that the system used flapping wings like a bird. The idea was that the plane used a similar system. That is used in some weight training systems. 

The idea was that the system's user pushes and pulls the stick that moves the wings. The reason that the flying machine didn't work. Was that Leonardo couldn't copy the bird's wing's movement trajectories. But maybe that system could work as a glider. 

But sometimes, some researchers suggested that the system was a glider that wings could put in a cargo position. And in the most incredible theories, the system used ion engines. The stick would ionize the air and the ring would pull those ions through it. But maybe that was a little too complicated even for Leonardo himself. 

Maybe Leonardo planned to use that glider with the great ballista. The giant crossbow would shoot that aviation system into the air. And the user of the system could drop the powder dish into the target. But then we can think that there is a possibility that Leonardo's tank was some kind of aviation machine. 

Some researchers created the UFO, by using Leonardo's tank as the model. The idea of this kind of flying machine was that in the middle of that flying machine is a quadcopter. The quadcopter is responsible for vertical movement. And then the cannons are replaced by radially installed jet engines. That thing allows the heavier-than-air system to hover above the land without noise. 

Aviation systems are always very interesting things. And we can only imagine what people like Leonardo da Vinci would do with the internet and modern computers.  

When we are looking at another of Leonardo's interesting models, his helicopter, the screw-looking wing is interesting. Maybe he created that aerial screw to use as a parachute. We can say that this screw-looking wing is meant for jumping from the cliff. 

So the user of the system will not rise from the ground. The user must only jump from the cliff, and then the screw will slow the jumper's speed. But if the airflow that comes from below pushes the system upwards. 

https://www.leonardodavinci.net/flyingmachine.jsp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo%27s_aerial_screw

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo%27s_crossbow

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo%27s_fighting_vehicle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_inventions_of_Leonardo_da_Vinci

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

Changes in a strong nuclear force affect the spin of phi mesons.

"New data show that local fluctuations in the nuclear strong force may influence the spin orientation of particles called phi mesons (made of two quarks held together by the exchange of gluons). Credit: Brookhaven National Laboratory"  (ScitechDaily.com/U.S. RHIC Atom Smasher Reveals a Surprising Preference in Particle Spin Alignment)

When the phi meson spins the string between quarks harvests energy. Then that energy pushes those particles away from each other. So the phi meson is acting like an energy harvester. If that particle exists longer time, that thing could use to measure the differences in energy levels around it. The energy harvester is a system that is two balls that are orbiting each other. 

When there is an antenna like a metal wire or laser ray between them that system sends electromagnetic wave movement to the sides of that energy harvester. And maybe in the future. These kinds of systems can use to create clean energy in space. 

The new research has shown that the changes in strong nuclear force can affect the spin of so-called Phi-mesons that include two quarks. The image above this text shows the spin of phi mesons. The quarks are orbiting each other and their common quantum field forms the phi-meson. The axle of the phi-meson seems to be in the middle of those two quarks. And this thing is remarkable. 

Could in the middle of those two quarks be some kind of particle? And could that hypothetical particle be the "quantum" the hypothetical elementary particle that is involved in all material and particles? The thing that makes phi-meson exist only a short moment. Then the two quarks that are forming this particle fly away. 

"Collisions of heavy ions “melt” the boundaries of individual protons and neutrons, setting free the quarks and gluons normally confined within to create a quark-gluon plasma (QGP). Scientists look for spin alignment preferences among particles emerging from the QGP by tracking the distribution of their decay products relative to an imaginary line drawn perpendicular to the reaction plane of the colliding nuclei. Credit: Brookhaven National Laboratory" (ScitechDaily.com/U.S. RHIC Atom Smasher Reveals a Surprising Preference in Particle Spin Alignment)

In some theories, the phi meson is the proto-particle. That was dominating material before the first hadrons formed after the Big Bang. In that model, high energy levels in the young universe kept those particles in form and they could form so-called mesonic material. Today that form of material does not exist anymore. But in the high-energy young universe, there is a possibility that phi mesons could form molecular-looking structures. 

Brookhaven laboratory made the impact tests with heavy ions. In that kinds of tests, the heavy ions are forming very hot debris. That debris is the quark-gluon plasma that is the most high-energy material in the world. That plasma is used for simulating conditions just after the Big Bang. But there is a possibility that the impacts of the heavy ions can use to form long-term phi mesons. The phi mesons require a very high energy level for forming. And a higher energy level means a longer lifetime. 

Those mesons can use to measure things like dark energy. The idea is when the phi meson spins it forms a sensor that could harvest the dark energy. If dark energy is forming strings or extremely thin magnetic fields. And then the phi meson impacts with those strings that should affect their spin. But that requires an extremely high energy level. 

https://scitechdaily.com/u-s-rhic-atom-smasher-reveals-a-surprising-preference-in-particle-spin-alignment/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phi_meson

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

How to release the creativity of conventional thinkers?

The main problem with so-called silent knowledge is how to make that person who has silent knowledge share that knowledge with others people. When we are thinking about silent knowledge we must realize that silent knowledge that keeps in people's heads doesn't benefit the company. So how to motivate people to share that silent knowledge?

All people have a similar brain. All people have similar neural structures. So why are all people not creative? That is one of the most interesting questions in psychology. There is made a research on how to wake up productive and creative thinking in regular people. But when we make those research we must remember that when people get space and support being creative. They turn to creativity. 

That means we create the right environment that supports creativity. We can wake creative thinking in every person's mind. We are always jealous of people like Leonardo Da Vinci. We should realize what kind of benefit those people could bring to R&D work. 

In that model, we can say that every single person is creative, and people must dare to be creative. And then people must dare to tell their ideas to other people. So if we cheat other people of their ideas they might keep them in their minds. 

And that is a sad thing when we are making new products. If people are afraid to bring their ideas to other people's knowledge, those ideas remain unknown. And those silent ideas benefit anybody. If people don't dare to tell their ideas those ideas remain unknown. 

One reason why people are afraid to tell their ideas is that they are afraid of discrimination. People who are different than the majority are always in danger of discrimination. 

When we are thinking about creative people and people who have things like ADHD we face one common thing: Those people are different from the majority. When people are creative. Some other people are jealous. 

Jealous people can tell "dirty things" about people who are somehow different from what they are. Sometimes those stories cause witch hunts in working society. When a person is different. That means people are watching them more carefully. 

That thing causes discrimination. Same way, when a person has things like ADHD, that means people are different. Being different causes discrimination. 

The thing is that creative people are many times also different than others. This is one of the reasons why creative people more often get depression and other kinds of things. When people are different from than majority. 

That is always causing danger of discrimination and isolation. Isolation causes depression. But is it so, that different people like people with ADHD have depression more often than "regular" people? Or are other people just sharper with people, who have ADHD or who are creative? The thing is that many people think that if the person is different, that justifies discrimination. 

https://scitechdaily.com/new-research-reveals-the-secret-to-unleashing-creativity-in-conventional-thinkers/

https://scitechdaily.com/adhd-persists-throughout-life-strongly-linked-to-mental-health-issues-like-anxiety-and-depression/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The next-generation biological solar cell could be useful in green energy. And in the power supply of manned space stations

Right) "The ice plant succulent shown here can become a living solar cell and power a circuit using photosynthesis. Credit: Adapted from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c15123" (ScitechDaily.com/Scientists Have Developed a Living “Bio-Solar Cell” That Runs on Photosynthesis)

The long-term space mission that is limited inside the asteroid belt is also challenging. The spacecraft or space stations can travel between Mars and earth by using ion motors that get their electricity from solar panels. Also, the Mars- and moon stations can use solar panels for energy production. The same technology that is used in Mars or Moon stations can use in the isolated research stations on Earth. 

And places like Antarctica can use to develop this kind of technology. The idea is that those stations are used to test things like closed-cycle life-support. If food can produce at the moon station, that radically decreases its costs. And moon station can use to test the technology, that is needed for the Mars station. 

There is a possibility that spacecraft or space station gets at least part of their electricity from a biological source. In this case, biological solar cells can use along with regular solar panels. When we think about the use of biological solar panels at isolated places, that thing makes the station more energy efficient than before. Even in the dark seasons the ability to recycle part of the energy that is used in the greenhouse. 

That is producing food is making the system more energy efficient. The solar-power can use along with things like wind generators. And in the summertime in Antarctica, the operators can fix wind generators when solar panels are used to make electricity. Also, biological solar panels can recycle part of the energy that is used in greenhouses. 

But the thing is that the living solar cells that are photosynthetic and can create electricity from living vegetables are an interesting alternative. In that case, the same system can create electricity, it can clean the air by using photosynthesis. And that kind of living solar cell can also offer nutrients for the spacecraft's or space station's crew. That thing allows using limited space more effectively than otherwise. 

Developing green energy is important. And always at the beginning of the system is in small-scale systems. But then those systems can escalate to everyday use. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-have-developed-a-living-bio-solar-cell-that-runs-on-photosynthesis/

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Astronomers found web-looking plasma structures on the sun. (Could a protective field be possible?)

Image above: Corona

The new web structure is found in the middle corona. That area is about 1,5-4 R/sun away from its liquid surface. The new web structure of intensive heat plasma is interesting. The existence of these kinds of structures tells that electromagnetic forces inside plasma around the sun can resist the solar wind. And that thing makes many interesting visions for plasma technology. 

The layer of the plasma web can make it possible to create the next-generation plasma shields. The idea is that two 2D plasma webs are created around the object. Then there is a layer of rotating plasma between those webs. The idea is that the rotating plasma can pull laser rays and ions in it. And that makes it possible to create a protective field around the structures. The problem with protective fields has been how to control that structure. 

In some visions, the protective fields are created by using a whisk-looking skyrmion structure. The 3D-looking skyrmion structure will be made around the magnetic axle. And then, the system puts a whisk-looking 3D skyrmion structure to rotate. That thing makes it possible to destroy incoming ammunition which is trying to go through that skyrmion structure. 

There is also the possibility that ball lightning is a skyrmion structure. The idea is that the lightning forms a stick-looking water structure. So it stretches the water droplet to stick. And then there forming the skyrmions in a high-power magnetic field around the water droplet. 

When we are thinking about the most futuristic use of the plasma web we can see that kind of structure as the protective field. That kind of plasma field can protect any object against micrometeorites and even electromagnetic radiation. 

If researchers can put this kind of web of intensive heat plasma to hover around things like space stations and aircraft or any other structures. That plasma structure can protect the target against all material ammunition. The two-layer plasma web can close the plasma that rotates the object between them. And that thing makes it possible. That the system can control plasma very accurately. 

https://middlecorona.com/introduction.html

https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-have-discovered-web-like-plasma-structures-on-the-sun/

https://tiedetuubi.fi/onko-skyrmioni-pallosalaman-salaisuus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_corona

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

The origin of GRB (Gamma-Ray Bursts) is not probably in black holes, a new study says.

Researching the GRB (Gamma-Ray Bursts) is not very easy. The GRB is the effect that has the highest energy level in the universe. Nobody knows what form those most high-energy radiation impulses. Sometimes claimed, that impacting black holes are forming those things. 

Confirmation of those things requires that researchers can compile gravitational waves with GRBs. In some very popular theories, a fast-collapsing black hole sends the GRBs. The fact is that there might be multiple reasons for gamma-ray bursts. 

There are three types of gamma-ray bursts

1) Short gamma-ray bursts

2) Long gamma-ray bursts

3) Ultra-long gamma-ray bursts. 

And there is a possibility that those GRB types have different origins. And there is also the possibility that different effects can form similar-looking radiation effects.

Gamma rays are the most high-energy radiation in the universe. That makes it very hard to detect. And the problem for researchers in GRBs:s is that they are unique. They are not repeating. So when the sensor catches that radiation burst it's over. The new research claims that GRB forms in very hot young stars. 

Maybe the reason for that is the beginning of nuclear reactions. But there is a possibility that things like black hole gamma- or X-ray beams hit just born a blue giant. And that thing can form those very powerful radiation bursts.

When we are thinking about this model, we must realize one thing. The young super-hot stars or blue giants are involving mainly hydrogen. When a gamma-ray beam hits that star it rises the radiation level of that star. 

There is the possibility that in a short moment, the hot young star gets an electron core when the radiation beam from the star's nucleus pushes electrons to the same side as protons. At that moment star has multiple electron cores that are forming an onion-looking structure. That remains only a short moment. 

That forms the energy impact away from the star. And that energy impact forms the warp bubble. 

The rising radiation level could push other quantum fields away and form the short-term WARP bubble around that star. So in a short moment. Particles that leave from that star travel faster than they should. And when that warp bubble collapses the particle sends radiation when its speed decreases. 

 In some other theories things, like crossing gamma-ray beams from black holes can form GRBs. The GRB is a fascinating mystery. In less than a second something sends an extremely high-energy radiation beam to the universe. 

Image 2)

The Fermi bubbles at the center of the Milky Way are confirmed to be impact radiation. 

When radiation beams leave from Sagit A they are also taking particles and ions with them. They are also forming extremely high-energy plasma that expands like all other gas. That high-energy material forms two impact areas. And in those impact waves is forming gamma- or X-rays. Image 3 shows the impact areas that are forming the Fermi bubbles.

When particles leave from black holes' transition areas, they form wind where particles travel 1000 kilometers per second. "These winds travel outwards and interact with surrounding “halo gas,” causing a “reverse shock” that creates a characteristic temperature peak. The Fermi bubbles correspond to the volume on the inside of this reverse shock front". ScitechDaily.com/“Reverse Shock” – Mysterious Gamma-Ray Emitting Bubbles Around the Center of Our Galaxy Explained)

Image 3: 

There are two radiation bubbles at both poles of Sagit A the supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy. Those gamma-ray bubbles look a little bit like acetylene flames. The thing that forms those bubbles is impact radiation. The structure that forms around the radiation beam looks a little bit like a candle. 

Sagittarius A is a supermassive black hole that sends radiation beams to space from both of its poles. That radiation is powerful X-and gamma-rays. When those radiation beams hit atoms and ions it pumps energy to them. And then those particles are sending that extra radiation away from them. That effect forms two fermi bubbles on both poles of that black hole. 

In those bubbles, part of the radiation left from atoms travels backward. And impacts with radiation that comes from the radiation beams of Sagit A. In that case, the radiation forms a standing wave movement where the power of radiation increases. 

https://scitechdaily.com/not-black-holes-astronomers-may-need-to-rethink-how-gamma-ray-bursts-are-formed/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_burst

https://scitechdaily.com/reverse-shock-mysterious-gamma-ray-emitting-bubbles-around-the-center-of-our-galaxy-explained/

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Tachyon and time reverse.

Is tachyon particle in WARP-bubble? Or is it rather a phenomenon than a particle? Or is tachyon only wave motion that travels just behind neutrino or some other particle? 

There is the possibility that the hypothetical tachyon particle does not exist. Or time-traveling tachyon particles do not exist. 

It's possible. That all hypothetical tachyons are not transporting information back in time. Or even if those particles transport information to the past, that information cannot interact with other particles. In that case, the faster-than-light particles are traveling back in time, but they cannot send their information to other particles. 

The reason for that is linear spacetime model causes a situation where regular, slower-than-light particles are traveling forward in time. And the hypothetical faster-than-light particle is traveling back in time. So those particles are like in elevators where another particle is traveling down, and another is traveling up. 

If tachyons are traveling back in time there is the possibility that interaction between tachyons and other particles is so short that there is no time to detect that interaction. But if that thing is real and tachyons are traveling back in time. That forms a model where dark energy comes from tachyons. 

There is also the possibility that those hypothetical particles exist. But they just cannot interact with the material. So is the ability for interaction requirement for existence. 

There is the possibility that the hypothetical tachyon particle does not exist. Or time-traveling tachyon particles does not exist. There is also the possibility that those hypothetical particles exist. But they just cannot interact with the material. So is the ability for interaction requirement for existence. 

But the fact is clear nobody has seen tachyon yet. And maybe that particle does not exist. If tachyon exists that particle makes it possible to send information to the past. 

Proving the influence of that thing is very difficult. Because even if we send information the receiver must have the ability and be willing to follow that information. Then if that information causes some reaction. The past has always been to us. So it's hard to prove the success of that information transfer. 

And the reason for that is that. When in this hypothetical case, we send information to the past. The effect that this information cause is that the new reality replaces the old one. So the new reality stands from the point where that information is received. 

But that new reality has always been similar to us. So the reality is substance, and time and dimension are attributes. Two substances cannot share the same attribute. So there cannot be two realities at the same time. In the same dimension. And at one point in spacetime can be only one reality. 

But then we must realize another thing. If tachyons are faster-than-light particles they should be in the fourth dimension. So the shape of the tachyon in our third dimension could be the missing quantum-size black hole. The idea is that the tachyon's energy level is so high that it cannot interact with other materials. And that means it's out of our universe. 

Is tachyon particle in WARP-bubble? Or is it rather a phenomenon than a particle? Or is tachyon only wave motion that travels just behind neutrino or some other particle? 

In some models, a tachyon is a so high-energy particle that the quantum field around it forms WARP-bubble around that particle. That thing causes the situation where tachyon can travel faster than light. So in some models, a tachyon is only an electron or neutrino that's energy level is so high that it can travel faster than light in a short moment. Then that particle transforms into a photon and a Higgs boson. But there can be some kind of medium between the photon and the Higgs boson. So that means when the tachyon starts to interact it changes to some other particle. In that model, the tachyon is the particle with the lowest energy level in the fourth dimension. 

There is a couple of theories about the shape of the tachyon. 

*Tachyon does not exist as a particle. That means a tachyon could be some structure or phenomenon rather than a particle. So that means gravitons are particles with extremely high energy levels rather than fast-moving particles. 

*Tachyon could be flat or it's the bite of wave movement. So that means tachyon is not a particle in the form we know it. 

*In some theories tachyons are the same thing as gravitons. That means tachyons could be the source of gravitation waves. 

*In that model gravitational wave would be the channel that is forming when the tachyon travels in the universe. Or if the tachyon is the same thing as graviton gravitational waves are the tornado-shaped structure. That is forming in those quantum-size black holes. One of the most remarkable things is that graviton, tachyon, and quantum-size black holes are all hypothetical things. 

*Tachyon exists only in limited circumstances. That means tachyons could exist, as an example in black holes behind the event horizon. In some theories, a particle transforms into a tachyon when it crosses the event horizon. 

*Or in tachyon can form when some particles. Like neutrino is following some other particle that travels near the speed of light. In that case, the neutrino forms the cone where light can travel faster than other places in the universe. 

*There is a possibility that tachyons are forming in miniature voids in the universe. That thing means that when neutrino or some other particle travels in the void. And there is hitting wave movement that thing can form a situation where the neutrino's speed rises faster than it should. And that causes short-term crossing of the speed of light. And that time could be about zeptosecond class. 

*Tachyon could be the thing that is traveling inside particles or neutrinos. If the particle is like a whisk. And there is some other particle inside that cover-particle and that sub-particle moves ahead. That thing can form a tachyon. 

*So tachyon exists only short time. And that's why it's almost impossible to detect. In some visions, a tachyon is the forward-moving wave movement that leaves Higgs boson when its speed is slowing. 

*Tachyons can be a situation where the particles like photons or Higgs bosons spin in the direction where those particles are moving. That means tachyon is a rather phenomenon than a particle. 

But when we think of graviton as time traveling particle we face one remarkable thing. If we want to prove time reverse, we are in very big trouble. We must prove that information that we send changed something in history. But history always exists for us. And even if we change something in history, that thing always exists for us. So we cannot prove that we changed history. 

Albert Einstein predicted that tachyons allow transmitting information backward in time. The thing, that makes this problematic is that if we send information back in time. How can we prove that the information we send, caused some kind of effect? The past and its effect always exist on us. 

https://www.space.com/tachyon-time-travel-relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-symmetry

https://anewtonsapple.blogspot.com/

Baruch Spinoza's great ideas.

Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), Jew and atheist. 

The difference between religion and philosophy is that religion is like a ball. There is God, or some figure that people must respect. And that's it. Philosophy or religious philosophy includes questions who and what is God? And if we worship God, what the God worships? What is god for god? 

One of the questions that Spinoza's thoughts are forming is, does God have God? What if God creates another God? Is God an atheist? 

We can think that the world is like a sandbox. The sandbox is the main attribute that is full of subattributes. God is substance. 

Two substances cannot affect the same attribute. But substances can affect subattributes that are grains of sand. 

Baruch Spinoza wrote that God is the creator of nature. And otherwise, God is also part of created nature. So if we want to make decisions about the form of God by following the ideas that Baruch Spinoza created a long time ago we can ask one question. 

Does Spinoza mean, that God can create another God? That is one of the most interesting ideas of Baruch Spinoza. What if God wants to create another God with the same abilities as the first one? The fact is that those God and the God that it created cannot handle the same attribute. 

So God and second God cannot stay in the same world if we think that the world is an attribute and God is substance. But then we can also think that God and the second God can still live in the same world. They cannot handle or affect the same main attribute if they think that the World is the main attribute and that the main attribute is full of subattributes. 

That kind of idea caused trouble for Spinoza. But his way of handling God is interesting. For Spinoza, God is substance. 

The substance's existence doesn't depend on something else. But then Spinoza formed the idea that if God is substance, the other creatures cannot share the same attribute with God. 

Spinoza's idea was that there is no free will. And those ideas caused theological problems between Spinoza and other people. The most interesting question in that model is "can God make so big a stone, that he cannot rise it". That thing falls under the free will model of God.

But can substance make it possible to round that problem? The substance cannot handle two attributes at the same time. But the new substance can replace the old one. And that new substance can have the ability to handle the problem that was impossible for the preceding substance?  

If God wants to create so heavy stone that he cannot rise that stone. That means God create a substance that existence is limited. While that substance exists. God cannot rise that stone from the ground. 

But then God can create a new substance that refutes the preceding substance. The thing is that the same substance cannot handle two attributes or definitions at the same time. But the new substance can replace the old one. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Measure time in trillions of billionths of a second.

 It's time for quantum cryptography. 

Zeptosecond is trillions of billionths of a second. And the new atom clock or measurement method makes it possible to measure time in zeptoseconds accurately. That kind of accuracy is interesting. Because it allows the creation of new and faster microchip technology.

The binary computer is not dead even if quantum computers are coming. Binary computers are still dominating marketing. And in the future binary computers and binary microchips are still in use at the executive level of computer-controlled technology. 

The model of future computing has two levels. Even if quantum computers are becoming coming more common. The problem with quantum computers is that quantum entanglement is not stable. 

When the quantum entanglement reaches energy stability. That breaks the entanglement. And then, the binary computer must re-adjust the quantum system. 

*The quantum computers. That are in fixed positions. 

*And the binary computers that are working as the brain for robots. 

When remote quantum computers give commands to executive robots. It creates order by analyzing incoming data. Then that system sends operational orders for the executive robot. That robot makes the physical job of a quantum computer. 

This model is in use in modern computing. We don't use supercomputers straight with robots. The highly automatized systems use supercomputers as controllers, but in those cases, the supercomputers send commands to robots through the network. And in that model, the quantum computers are just put in the position of supercomputers. 

The virtualization of quantum computers. 

Binary computers can also operate as virtual quantum computers. In those virtual quantum systems, the system shares information as bites (or segments) to separate binary computers. In that kind of binary system, the binary computer group plays quantum computers. 

The TCP/IP protocol makes it possible to share information with segments. And those segments will send to binary computers as a line. That kind of system is less powerful than real quantum computers. But they are more powerful than regular stand-alone binary computers. 

In quantum communication the system shares message to different frequencies. And then that kind of system is harder to break. The thing is that receiver must get all parts of the message. And if there are multiple holes in the information. 

That causes the attacker cannot to read the message itself if that attacker doesn't have all of those frequencies. And because the system will pack information before it sends it. An attacker must also know the precise time. When the system sends the package. If the attacker misses the time, that means the attacker misses the code. 

The term non-symmetrical quantum encryption process means that. The system sends information packages by using separate frequencies and separately adjusted moments. That will physically protect information. 

This system is similar to the container. The idea is that each data pack has an ID number that tells where they belong. The model for that kind of cryptography is taken from warehouses. The idea is that system packs data in multiple packages that must be put in the same place. 

This kind of non-synchronized protocol means that there is a code in each data pack. That code tells the container where the system must drive each data pack. And the thing is that those data packs can send in at different times. They can send from different places. And different times. The idea is similar to the post office. 

The receiving system sends the time when the data packages that belong to certain messages must send. And then it gives the container number. That is the PO box that the system must use. That number that can be as an example 136 tells that the packages that have this registration number must send in, let's say at 8:36 o'clock in Eastern Pacific standard time. Or the time can be Timbuktu standard time. 

The receiving system collects those data packages to container number 136. In real life, those containers can have millions of numbers and letters in their serial numbers. There are hundreds of variants of that model. 

https://scitechdaily.com/zeptosecond-resolution-measuring-times-in-trillionths-of-a-billionth-of-a-second/

See also TCP/IP

The problem with research is the wrong generalization.

The purpose of research is to give new information about the focus. If research is well-made made by following empiric methodology. Those results can be generalized to almost similar cases. But sometimes when we are starting to generalize research results. We face the case that people are trying to generalize research results to the wrong objects.

The results that the research give can be generalized to cases and subjects that are similar to the original research. The thing that is seen very often is that things like example research or theories about quantum physics tried to suit psychology. Maybe that thing was a bad example, but let me explain this problem by using games. 

Chess and poker are both games. But we cannot play chess with poker rules. Of course, we can replace the missing chess button with a king by using the playing card king. And move the playing card on the chess board like that missing button. But still, we must follow the chess rules. But otherwise thinking, we cannot replace missing playing cards by using the chess button. 

This is the thing in research. Some cases that seem ridiculous are possible. Even if they look complicated or uncomfortable. But then we must be careful. We should not generalize things like "black swans". The term black swan means the extremely extraordinary but possible case. 

Even if somebody doesn't succeed in some research that thing is not making the thing impossible. Maybe that researcher didn't have time or enough information about the phenomenon that affects to research and results. Or they didn't have technology that makes it possible to control test conditions. 

So even if something was impossible in the past. That thing can be possible by using modern technology. 

In some extreme examples, meteorite drops to the laboratory table. And that thing causes very extraordinary results. The thing is that this kind of case is very uncommon. But they are possible. There is the possibility that this meteorite doesn't affect the research at all. 

Sometimes we are facing cases where people are standardizing extraordinary. Sometimes we have seen articles that are handling things like researchers or research. If we are reading only those articles, we can think that researchers like physicists are the most common people in the world. They might work in some research teams and they know only other researchers. 

The typical case doesn't mean that all cases in the group are similar. If we are returning to UFOs we must realize that even if NASA has no UFO in Cape Canaveral, that doesn't mean that there cannot be UFOs in other places on earth. 

That means some case doesn't close some other cases away. When we are trying to find a typical case we must realize one thing. We must find every data that was used in the original case. Let's take an example from chemistry. 

Things like temperature and used materials affect the research of the results of chemical experiments. If the original researcher used platinum electrodes in the original test, and we use them to cut the electric wire, and we didn't even wash them. Before we put those wires into the test tube, we can ask, are those tests similar? Or if the original researcher used a special laboratory where the temperature was something, let's say as an example -120 Celsius

And in the test used noble gas as a protective gas in a fully controlled chemical environment where is no oxygen. Then the original researcher used a laser that gave highly accurate energy impulses to that test. And we use some test tubes and handle on our kitchen counter and try to make the same results, we can ask are those conditions same.

Dark energy and wormholes

In one very wild theory energy channels or shortcuts through the universe called Einstein-Rose's bridges or wormholes transport energy and material from the Big Bang. To the middle of the universe's timeline. When material and energy are in a wormhole. They cannot interact with their environment. 

Theoretical wormholes form between superpositioned and entangled black holes. And that means when those black holes at the end of those wormholes are vaporizing. They are bringing energy outside the universe in it. 

When energy and material fall into black holes. Energy and material are out of the universe. The black hole itself is a giant wormhole. Because escaping velocity inside the event horizon is higher than the speed of light, that thing means time runs backward in that thing. Logically thinking Black holes should take information to the point where they formed. 

So when we think about dark energy and its connection with cosmic inflation. We can say just that there is too much free energy in a quantum system called the universe. The fact is that the source of dark energy is unknown. And that thing means it's dark. 

We know that it exists. But that is the only thing that we know about it. Dark matter is a strange gravitational effect whose source remains unknown. And in some theories, dark matter is particles whose temperature is lower than the cosmic background or zero Kelvin. 

In some theories, dark energy and dark matter have a connection. There is a possibility that dark matter is quantum size black holes that are sending radiation that we cannot see. When gravitational waves are traveling between those quantum-size black holes they will push energy to those gravitational waves. 

Gravitational waves are wave motion. When those gravitational waves receive extra energy they deliver it when the energy level around them turns lower. Or if gravitational waves are not delivering that extra energy. The hypothetical gravitons are delivering extra energy. When they are at lower gravitational energy space. 

Gravitation might seem very strange but it's wave motion. And its form of energy. So gravitons and gravitational waves are acting like all other wave motion.  There should be some transportation particle that sends gravitational waves. 

And gravitational waves can form every form that all other wave motions can form. That means things like gravitational skyrmions and other things are also possible. And maybe gravitational skyrmions are surrounding black holes. 

But somebody introduced that the source of dark matter is standing gravitational waves. That means that dark matter is virtual material. The fact is this. Dark matter is something that interacts with visible matter by gravitation. 

The gravitational interaction is the only known interaction between dark and visible matter. That means gravitation itself can accelerate hypothetical dark matter particles. When the dark matter is in some gravitational field that field just interacts with it like all other matter. And in some theories dark matter is the source of dark energy. 

The wildest theory of dark energy is that free energy comes from wormholes. That transports energy from the Big Bang to some point in the universe's timeline. 

Theoretical Einstein-Rose's bridge or wormhole is a shortcut through time and space. When the Big Bang happened. There could form many small black holes. 

The Big Bang could form a large black hole just after it.  If those black holes form wormholes between them and that larger black hole. That means they took energy and material away from the universe. In the theory of wormholes when material and energy or wave motion are in those energy channels, they cannot interact with the environment. 

That means the material and wave motion is outside the universe. It cannot interact with its environment. The reason for that is that the gravitational radiation that closes this channel is too strong. And it pushes all other gravitational radiation back into the wormhole. 

So when some of those black holes are vaporizing. They release energy to the universe. And that means if there is a wormhole from the Big Bang to a certain point in the universe's timeline it forms the shortcut to that point in time and space. Those black holes deliver energy that comes outside the universe. 

See also: 

Cosmic inflation

Dark energy

Dark matter

Wormhole

In visions of the future, colonists in the asteroid belt live in O'Neill cylinders.

In the future, there could be space cities in the asteroid belt. In visions, That cylinder-shaped space colony creates artificial gravitation using the centripetal force created by rotational motion. 

Wild visions are interesting. And one of the most interesting things is space cities called O'Neill cylinders. In that kind of cylinder-shaped space station rotating motion causes a centripetal force that creates artificial gravitation. That kind of solution makes it possible that humans can live in those space cities in the gravitational field. 

The artists' vision of the O'Neill cylinder and space city is humbler than the original visions of the O'Neill cylinders. There is a hollow core that rotates around its central axle. And that motion makes the artificial gravitation to the colony. 

When we think that the rotation speed of that kind of space colony must be very high that can create the same gravitation as Earth some people say that the motion will break the structure. The fact is that the gravitation must not be the same as it's on Earth. 

There are two possibilities where gravitation can use. 

1) Slowly rotating space station can make weak gravitation that can just anchor objects on the table. That is the more conventional way to make artificial gravitation than the fast-rotating space station. 

2) Fast rotating space station creates gravitation that is so strong as on Earth. The structures of that kind of space station must be very strong or there could be a magnetic system that pulls the core of that structure inside.

That magnetic structure keeps the space station in one piece even if the centripetal force is very strong. And without that magnetic pulling, they rip the space station to pieces. 

Image 2) NASA's vision of a large-scale O'Neill cylinder where plantations produce food for colonists. There are also forests that make the colony more comfortable. (Image: Wikipedia: O'Neill cylinder) 

Weak gravitation is better than without gravitation. And the purpose of gravitation can be just to anchor objects on the table. But if we think that the gravitation must be strong as on Earth. There is the possibility that in the middle of the cylinder is a magnet. That pulls its structure to the middle of it. The magnetic system will keep the structure as one piece. 

Well, somebody says that rotating motion makes people sick. That thing is not quite right. If there are no windows in that cylinder people would not see the rotation motion. There is also the possibility to use anti-nausea medicine on board that kinds of stations. 

When we think about the sickness that the rotation movement causes, we always forget that this station would be outside space. So people who would live on board that O'Neill cylinder is not living in regular houses. The selection process for those people would be very accurate. Those people are not moving to a regular house, and renting a flat. They are astronauts who are carefully selected. 

Those space people would move to space. The situation would be the same as we compare an astronaut who goes to the space station with a person who buys a bus ticket. The selection process of that astronaut is more accurate than a regular passenger in some city buses. 

https://scitechdaily.com/wild-research-project-reveals-how-future-cities-on-asteroids-could-work/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Neill_cylinder