New studies are uncovering the form of PTSD.

PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) is one of the most interesting things in psychology. PTSD  forms from traumatic stress, like when people face ultimate violence. PTSD is connected with war. And that means the case, where people do not remember anything about the combat situations. 

But also, accidents and other types of violence like street violence can cause PTSD. PTSD is the result of ultimate shock. And the thing that uncovers PTSD are flashbacks and sometimes phobias. PTSD is linked with all kinds of violence. Verbal violence like threatening children with rejection can cause PTSD. 

There is the possibility that if the person is a child and faces stressful situations like almost being hit by a car that child doesn't dare to tell about that thing at home. Especially if that child is at that place without permission. 

Same way, if the child is the eyewitness of a violent situation, that thing causes traumatic stress. Even the threat can cause the situation. That person doesn't dare to climb on roofs. And sometimes things like threats in some summer jobs are uncovered because a person is afraid to do that kind of work. 

When the person will go to a similar- or same-looking environment where a traumatic situation happened. That thing causes flashbacks. And some "ghost experiences" are flashbacks caused by PTSD. If the person faces a situation at a very young age where the car almost hit that person a similar place can cause a flashback. And the person sees a similar car coming towards them. 

Stressful situations like sexual-, or some other kinds of harassment in cellars can cause the situation. That person will not dare to go cellar even in when that person is an adult. Researchers are investigating PTSD because it uncovers hidden violence. 

https://scitechdaily.com/paving-the-way-for-new-ptsd-treatments-scientists-reveal-how-the-brain-stores-remote-fear-memories/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Where do we need scholars?

Mysteries are fascinating things. And without mysteries are no scholars, and sometimes some people tell a joke that scholars are behind some mysteries because we want to keep our jobs.

Jokes are a good argument for crushing researchers. Press introduced  Charles Darwin as a monkey when he introduced the evolution theory. That thing was very nice because a couple of hundred years earlier that man would burn on the bonfire. 

The best receipt is that tell people that all mysteries are urban legends, and then after that, some jokes about the researcher's mental health make an impression. 

If we follow that track, we face the argument:  humans invented all things, that we can. And we don't need anything new. And everything that we can find is found. So that's why we don't need any new things. We can solve all things by taking assault rifles in our hands and that's it. If there is some Big Foot in the forest we can shoot it. And there is no BigFoot anymore. But does that remove the mystery? 

Maybe that thing is right. Or maybe, it's wrong. But when we are looking at a mystery, we must research one thing. We must find out what makes those things mysterious. 

If we read some books. That tells about mysteries. We must try, to find out why the writer selected just those certain cases for that book. What category did that writer use? And what is the writer's or document maker's attitude about those things that the person introduces to people? 

Does the writer or filmmaker leave space for the audience? That they can make their conclusions? And does the storyteller offer them a chance to discuss and talk about their opinions? Or is the story's purpose just to curve the opponent's opinion for some mold that the document maker wants them to get? 

When we think of the sad series of researchers that says "certainly that is impossible", we must realize one thing. When people make some conclusions, they must use information. That they have at that precise moment. 

The observation tools are advancing, and some things are changing. So we must avoid too strong opinions because if we take some attitude and defend it very strongly we are in a psychological trap. 

That trap is that someday we all face the situation that we are wrong. And at that moment, we must say that we are wrong. We know that we should know something. But even if something remains theory let's say about 100 years the new observation tool can prove that theory right or wrong. 

When somebody selects a certain path or road and publically tells that thing. There is somehow very difficult to select a new path. Because that requires that our person must confess being wrong. And that is very hard if a person is afraid to lose authority.

Sometimes people misunderstand the difference between leadership and scholarship. They think that scholarship and leadership are the same things.  Scholars observe some phenomenon or object and try to make a puzzle and find out what that thing makes and how the parts of the entirety interact.  Leaders can use that information, or they can leave that information outside decision-making. That's their business. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Researchers deflect lightning with a laser rod.

Lasers can use to deflect lightning. There is the possibility that laser rays can use to form ion or eruption channels by ionizing air. And then electrons can travel through that channel. Lasers are electron beams that can be aimed by using electromagnetic fields. 

Another way to aim electron beams is to make anion and cation clouds to certain sides of the electron's routes. In that case, negative and positive electromagnetic fields are aiming the lightning in the wanted direction.  

Anions, which are negative atoms are pushing the electrons, and cations which are positive atoms are pulling electrons. So cation and anion clouds can use to aim electron beams. Researchers can make artificial lighting simply by pumping electricity or radio waves into clouds. The electric load of the cloud increases, until the electrons can travel to the ground. In some cases, the aircraft that travels above the cloud can be hit by lightning. 

In that case, the aircraft's body gets positive polarity. If the cloud has negative polarity electrons start to travel to the aircraft. That thing increases the level of free energy in the aircraft's body. That causes immediate destruction. The ability to aim flashes of lightning can make it possible to transport electricity through the air. 

But this kind of ability to control high-voltage electron beams is probably interesting to the military. Synthetic lightning has much more energy than photons. 

And the ability to aim that kind of beam at targets can make next-generation cathode weapons possible. In those models, the target is loaded with the positive electric load. And then the electron beam will shoot at it. This kind of system can be very effective in orbital trajectory. 

If the satellite is loaded with negative electricity. It starts to pull protons and other cations to it. This can cause a situation where the satellite will just seem to slam by the solar wind. That kind of system can jam the satellite in a way that looks like an accident or bad luck. 

https://phys.org/news/2023-01-deflecting-lightning-laser-rod.html

https://www.sciencealert.com/firing-a-laser-into-the-sky-can-divert-lightning-experiment-shows

https://www.technologynetworks.com/analysis/articles/cation-vs-anion-definition-chart-and-the-periodic-table-322863

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/2023/01/researchers-deflect-lightning-with.html

Researchers made two entangled light beams. And that is a breakthrough in long-term and long-distance quantum communication.

"Researchers using an optical parametric oscillator light source succeeded in producing two entangled light beams. (Artist’s concept.)" (ScitechDaily.com/ Quantum Breakthrough: Light Source Produces Two Entangled Light Beams)

One of the reasons why quantum computers are under development is that they are hard to jam. Regular binary computers use the binary system. The binary system's model is the 2D data structure. Data, that is stored in mass memory. Forms of data allocation units. Those data allocation units can be bits or bytes etc...  (Bit or Byte is the size of the data allocation unit)

The problem with 2D data structure is this.  If two programs or event handlers (or data handlers)  try to touch the same unit this thing causes that system will jam. The event handlers cannot copy information from the same point to two different places. The problem is that in 2D data structure is that the data allocation units cannot go over each other. 

In quantum systems, data allocation units can go over one another. A qubit-form data allocation unit forms a 3D structure like a tower. So if two event handlers need to use the same data allocation unit. At the same time, they can touch the qubit from the data allocation unit in different places. In quantum systems, the qubit's layers or states' order is not as important as it's in 2D systems. If each state involves information that was its place in the qubit. The system knows how to remake the qubit. 

If we want to send information by using quantum networks we have one small problem. We must confirm the message that the receiver gets involving the same information, that the sender packed in the message. If something misses the sender must send the information again. The best way is to send the same message by using two routes. In that version, the system compares the information, that travels in both lines. 

The system can reduce the number of data units between those lines. And if the checksum is zero, that means data that travels in those data lines is identical. That thing requires the ability to make two identical superpositioned and entangled light or some other electromagnetic beams. If we think that we want to send information from point A to point B. And use this kind of technology. 

We must be sure that information doesn't travel through the same disturbance. If information travels through the same disturbance that can cause an identical error in the information package. So the system must send information back to the sender. And that verifies if the involvement of the information package is not changed. 

When researchers create more advanced and effective security methods. Those works have two purposes. 

1) Secure involvement of information package against eavesdroppers. 

2) Secure involvement of the information package against changes. 

The second purpose of security means. The information that the receiver gets identifies what the sender sends. So protecting the involvement of the information package is the prime purpose of security. 

Security is needed in long- and short-distance communication. The system must protect data when it travels in the system or between systems. The vulnerability can be fatal in the microchip's internal communication and communication between two systems. 

If the speed of systems is extremely high even short-term artifact effects cause very bad damage to the data packages. In mathematical calculations, even a small error causes wrong results. And in mathematics is only right and wrong answers. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-breakthrough-light-source-produces-two-entangled-light-beams/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/