Multiverse theory, reality, or simply an idea?

   Multiverse theory, reality, or simply an idea? 

Are parallel multiverses real or not? The answer is that we don't know. We have no observations about those things. And that means they are non-proven models or theories. Or, maybe we should call the multiverse: "logical continuum of the universe structures, or models". 

So, it's rather philosophy than a scientific theory. That model explains dark energy, dark matter, and other unknown things as the energy and particles that come from another universe. There are instances where the universe in which we live will fall back to a single point. And then form again. That model is called "phoenix universe". Or in some models, another universe exists in the fourth or higher dimensions. But those models are unproven.. And maybe they will be unproven forever. In some models, things like virtual reality are also part of the multiverse or parallel universe theories. 

Multiverse is the theoretical framework where the universe is introduced as one of many universes. Or is it even a theoretical framework? The fact is that there is no single evidence of that thing. So, the multiverse theory is rather a philosophical conjecture or, so-called, logical expansion of the observations that researchers made of the universe. That means that if we believe the universe is composed of galactic superclusters, other universes would be universe-scale superclusters or hyperclusters. 

The other universe would be so dim that we cannot see it. In that type of observation, stars and other structures in our universe deny that sensors can detect radiation that comes from other universes. If they even exist. And who cares if those other universes exist? The multiverse is one of the models that tries to explain where matter came to our universe. That model could explain where matter came to our universe. But it would not explain where material in other universes came from? 

But there is one very interesting model of the multiverse. That model tells us that maybe we live in a black hole. Those hypothetical models explain why we cannot see things outside the universe that the black hole's material disk and halo press all waves that come from outside into a straight form. That means that we cannot see information in that wave movement. That model means that there can be other universes in the black holes. 

Those things are the fourth dimension. So there is a theoretical model. The black holes involve structures that are like our universe. So, that is one of the models that are made to explain why the universe exists. And the universe is part of the system of internal black holes. That is one of the models of the multiverse theory. 

But does the time reverse destroy that model? If we think of internal black holes, there is a possibility that when information comes to the edge of the next black hole or black hole's event horizon, time starts to move oppositely. So that means every black hole causes time reversal. But does that thing cause retrocausality? The retrocausality means that reaction comes before action. 

Even if those particles turn younger. Don't mean that things start to happen backward. 

Retrocausality seems like somebody looks at the film backwards. Or, that's how we represent that thing. But the fact is that retrocausality is not seen in large-scale structures. That thing is seen only in the smallest subatomic particles and their superposition tests. 

But then we can imagine one of the most interesting things in the multiverse philosophy, or the multiverse hypothesis. That thing is the anti-universe. Time moves backward because the anti-universe is in the middle of the big crunch.  Because particles and quantum fields turn closer and fields turn denser, that means time moves backward in that hypothetical space. But that doesn't necessarily mean that there is retrocausality in that universe. Maybe all things happen the same way as on Earth. But particles turn younger. 

A hypothetical black hole in that hypothetical universe will be an interesting thing. The idea is that time turns to travel backward in the point of the event horizon. So, that means that if the black hole is in an anti-universe, time travels oppositely in that black hole. So if time travels backward in the space behind the event horizon. That means time travels like it does in our universe if time travels backward around the black hole. 

The anti-universe means the universe that falls to the Big Crunch. Because all fields turn denser and stronger, the black hole will expand all the time. That means there is a possibility that this theoretical black hole in the theoretical anti-universe will not send gravity waves, because an expanding event horizon will close gravity waves inside it. The anti-universe doesn't necessarily mean a universe that forms from antimatter. Antimatter is like regular matter otherwise. 

But antimatter electrons have positive and antimatter protons have negative electric polarity. The anti-neutron spin is opposite to that of the neutron.  When an antimatter particle touches its mirror particle, both of those particles turn into radiation in the violent reaction called annihilation. That is the most powerful reaction in the known universe. But otherwise, antimatter reacts the same way to gravity and other fields. Antimatter is planned to be used in spacecraft. Because. It gives a very strong energy load. But that's the own story. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/parallel-universes-multiverse-real/

https://www.space.com/space-exploration/james-webb-space-telescope/is-our-universe-trapped-inside-a-black-hole-this-james-webb-space-telescope-discovery-might-blow-your-mind

https://www.space.com/32728-parallel-universes.html

https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/the-multiverse-are-we-living-in-one-of-many

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality

The universe, its particles, and quantum fields.

"New research suggests that collapsing stars may serve as natural laboratories to uncover hidden neutrino behavior, with potential implications for the birth of black holes and neutron stars. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, The Universe’s Most Elusive Particles Might Be Talking to Themselves)

Wave-particle duality (WPD) means that particles can turn into energy and vice versa: energy or energy fields can turn into particles. WPD means that particles are only the denser points in the quantum fields. The fact is that the particles require quantum fields for their existence. Without those quantum fields, there is no resistance that can push particles into their form. And that means if we take quantum fields out, energy flows away from particles, ripping them into pieces. And that turns particles into wave movement or quantum fields. Dark energy can form in some sub-particle structures that are too small to detect. 

But anyway, if a particle goes out from the universe, it turns into a wave immediately. And that makes it hard to detect anything outside the universe. The temperature outside the universe is unknown, but it's lower than 3K radiation or Planck radiation. It might be lower than the thermal minimum in the universe. And if that energy level is lower than the thermal minimum, 0K or -273.15C. That means energy can travel only out of the universe. That makes it impossible to observe things outside the universe. 

The most elusive particles in the universe can play an important role in neutron star and black hole formation. 

Neutrinos are almost massless particles. Their interaction with other particles is very weak. And that makes them travel through planets without touching anything. But today, researchers noticed a new interaction between neutrinos. That means a neutrino can interact with other neutrinos. And that makes those elusive particles more interesting than they were before. When a neutrino travels through objects, it takes some part of the quantum fields with it. That means those quantum fields transfer energy to the neutrino when it travels through them. 

Can the gravitational version of the Meissner effect be possible? In that gravitational Meissner effect, gravitational waves act like electromagnetic fields in the Meissner effect. And can this kind of effect also explain why neutrino interaction is so weak? The case where EM-fields travel past the particle that turns them denser than that thing allows the particle tunnel itself through walls? So is the spin of the neutrino so fast that a similar effect to the Meissner effect can make it almost weightless. If a neutrino hovers in an EM-pocket, it's hard to detect. 

"Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature." (Wikipedia, Meissner-effect) Tc=Temperature Critical. Could there be a similar critical level to gravity?

In the theoretical model, the gravitational waves in extremely dense, fast-spinning particles can act in the same way as electromagnetic fields act in the so-called Meissner effect.  That theoretical phenomenon can be called the gravitational Meissner effect. Or the antigravity. 

If the gravitational Meissner effect exists, that thing can make gravitational levitation possible. The idea is that the fast-spinning particle can turn into a quantum-sized black hole. And that thing makes it possible that gravitational waves travel past the particle. The gravitational Meisner effect can explain some details about black holes. Radiation that travels past those objects closes them inside the radiation bag. So the thing that makes black holes special is that regular and quantum gravity are connected in them. The fast-spinning, extremely dense objects can create a situation where they don't let gravitational waves travel through them. That thing can make the gravitational Meissner effect possible. 

When a neutrino beam travels through the star, that thing can act like airflow that travels through rooms. The neutrino beam takes energy with it. And that decreases the temperature in the star's core. That thing can cause a very dangerous situation when the energy level decreases in the star’s core and the route of the neutrinos. When the energy level decreases, that means the energy that can resist gravity turns lower. And that neutrino beam can cause situations that start to explode sooner than it should. When the energy level decreases, that means the star's outer layers start to fall to its core, and that can cause extreme peaks in the energy production. 

Can a neutrino be the thing that glues quantum and regular gravity together? The idea in quantum gravity is that some kind of radiation or small particles that travel through the particles turns them cold. When something takes energy away from an object, outgoing energy tries to replace that energy. That movement continues until energy levels inside and outside the object are at the same level. In some models, the spin of particles binds quantum fields to them. 

That means particles turned those fields into kinetic energy. The energy that the particle binds pulls other particles to that thing. So, theoretically, a quantum-sized black hole requires that the spin of the particle turns so high. 

When large and dense groups of particles spin, they bind lots of energy into them. Without that spin, that particle’s existence ends. The question is, where do particles put the energy that they store? The outside quantum field pushes structure into its form. If that quantum field turns too weak relative to the structure, the energy that comes out from the structure destroys it. The question is, could the extremely fast-spinning quantum black hole emit gravitational radiation past it? That causes an interesting question about the gravitational Meissner effect's existence. If that Meissner effect's gravitational version exists, that means the gravitational levitation can turn into reality.   

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/quantum-fields-quantum-particles/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-universes-most-elusive-particles-might-be-talking-to-themselves/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

 

Can teleportation be possible?

Theoretically, laser rays can transport even humans. 

A hypothetical teleportation machine creates the photon cloud by stressing teleported objects' atoms with electromagnetic radiation. Then it will make quantum entanglement between those photons and the photons that are forming a hologram at the front of the object. Then the system must rise the teleported object's energy high enough. And that makes the object slide into the hologram. 

This is writing about hypothetical teleportation. The only fact that I can tell about teleportation is that it is certainly possible at the quantum level. Quantum teleportation or quantum superposition and entanglement are the key elements in quantum computers. But can we someday transport 3D structures or even humans by using the same method? 

There is the possibility that teleportation is possible only in 2D structures. 

There is a possibility that somewhere in the future we can make real teleportation for 3D structures and chemical compounds. There is a theoretical possibility that the system can superposition and entangle the quarks and electrons that are forming even the human body. The system could use holograms as the matrix where the particles of the human body will superposition. 

First, the system makes holograms. Then the system makes the particles like quarks and electrons release photon clouds around them. Then those photons will superposition and entangle with photons that form a hologram.  Then the system rises the energy of the transported object and it should flow to that hologram. But is that thing possible in real life? Maybe somewhere in the future. 

The fact is that we can move elementary particles like electrons by bombing them with photons. Theoretically, we could move any object through the universe by using laser rays. And put the structure tunnel itself through the walls. The idea of that kind of teleportation is that the particles that form an object will be loaded with energy. 

And then that energy pushes atoms or their quantum fields away from their route. But this is very difficult to make in real life by using more complicated structures than some elementary particles. 

But if we want to move 3D structures through the wall by using laser rays. We are facing one very big problem. We must affect each particle in the structure precisely at the same moment.

 If we will shoot 3D structures with lasers. The laser ray hits particles that are at the laser's side they are transmitting energy forward in structure. That causes the energy blast or energy wave that destroys the structure. At least in the moment, when energy pumping ends, the particle releases its extra energy as wave movement. And it destroys the material structure. 

The energy traps or zero energy pockets or energy wells where extra energy can flow can be one solution for energy problems in teleportation. The problem with teleportation is extra energy. That rips the system in pieces. 

One of the solutions that can make teleportation possible is the energy trap in the structure. If there is a so-called energy trap or minimum energy substructure in the system that allows extra energy to flow in those traps. But there is a possibility that this kind of thing cannot do in 3D structures. The energy trap is the channel where the system is put to a minimum energy level. That trap allows the energy to flow in it. 

So how could we teleport the object? That thing happens by transforming the 3D structure into a 2D structure. Then the laser ray can stress all particles in the structure at the same time. During that process, the system's creators must create so-called energy traps or minimum energy points to the structure. That allows the extra energy to flow in those points after energy stress ends. 

The problem is how to transform the 3D object into a 2D object. And return it to the 3D form. There is another possibility to make the object stay in one form is to decrease the energy level of the particles at the side where energy strikes to a minimum. That allows the system can receive more energy than as warm. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/human-teleportation/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleportation

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The new theory suggests that life on Earth-type planets is likely.

The term earth-type planets mean planets that have similar structures to Earth. They might have solid cores.

But the water layer can cover the entire rocky world. These kinds of planets are called water worlds. 

Or they might be dry. That means there could be hydrocarbon oceans but no water on those planets. Those rocky planets are like the giant Titan moon. There could be giant oceans that formed of hydrocarbons. 

The hostile-looking planets can host the Black Swan-versions of lifeforms. Black Swan means a possible but extremely extraordinary case. And maybe, some extraordinary planet hosts very extraordinary but primitive life forms. 

There is Earth type of planets that are covered with lava oceans. And that kind of lava planet is the only planet that cannot host alien life. Or there is the possibility that in the atmosphere of those hellish planets can hover organisms that use the atmospheric temperature of that planet as an energy source. 

Those life forms could be rather DNA or RNA-controlled miniature crystals than bacteria. There is the possibility that those bacteria are multiplying very fast, and even if a single organism could live only minutes that entirety can be stable. But that kind of theoretical lifeform is possible but very extraordinary. So those theoretical extreme primitive alien proteobacteria are like the "Black Swan" phenomenon of lifeforms. 

So water worlds and super-earths can also be determined as Earth-type planets. Intelligent lifeforms are not the same thing as lifeforms. The lifeforms of those rocky worlds might be different than we can even imagine. And before we can send probes to those distant rocky planets or find lifeforms from some gas giants' icy moons, we can only make hypotheses and theories about the shape of extraterrestrial lifeforms. 

And there is no place where we can close things like primitive lifeforms straight out from possibilities. Those hypothetical lifeforms can live in the depth of the ocean that covers the super earth. And even if the super earth orbits very close to the red dwarf there is a possibility that the super-Earth's massive gravitation keeps the water liquid. So along with water vapor, the planet could be more suitable for fish-type alien organisms than people normally think. 

The surface of the water and atmosphere can be boiling. But deep inside the ocean, the temperature can be more comfortable. Because the planet could orbit the M-type red dwarf there is a possibility that the hypothetical planet is locked. And the nightside, along with the monsoon stabilizes the atmosphere's temperature. Also, water flow between night and dayside of a locked planet could make the ocean of that kind of planet very comfortable. And the atmosphere would be more gentle than we even thought. 

Could a planet with hot ice, Gliese 436b host life? 

Hypothetical lifeform of the most extraordinary exoplanet, Gliese 436b, "the world of burning ice". 

But if we are thinking about the super earth and especially super-earth where the massive gravitation makes water impossible to vapor. There is the possibility that the exoplanets that "hot ice" covers can host hypothetical lifeforms that are similar to tapeworms on Earth. 

We can ask: "could that kind of planet host any kind of lifeform"? The planet Gliese 436b is the kind of planet where massive gravitation causes the effect, where the planet's entire surface is covered by hot ice. The planet's surface is about 712 Kelvin, and the name of that planet is "planet with burning ice". The massive gravitation makes the water stay in the form of ice in very hot conditions. 

The Gliese 436 b is the strangest exoplanet ever found. And that means other exoplanets are less extreme. But can that kind of super strange exoplanet have living habitats? 

The answer is "yes". That Neptune size exoplanet can have tapeworm-type alien worms that could live in that hot ice. Those 2-dimensional alien creatures can dig tunnels in that hot ice. 

And they might have similar electric cells as an electric eel. Those cells can turn the ice or water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen. So those hypothetical lifeforms can be a little bit similar to tapeworms on the Earth. That thing came to my mind when I read about the new theory that life is more common in the universe than we ever imagine. 

https://futurism.com/the-strangest-exoplanet-ever

https://scitechdaily.com/new-theory-suggests-that-the-origin-of-life-on-earth-like-planets-is-likely/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_436_b