What is outside the universe?

 What is outside the universe? 

So is a universe in the middle of emptiness? The fact is: emptiness and vacuum are relative. Because we are in the middle of the universe. We cannot measure things that are outside the universe. If we want to measure differences between two systems. We must see both of those systems. 

We can think that water is one system and the air is another system. Also, space around the earth and finally the universe are systems. And if we are in the middle of a swimming pool we cannot measure the pressure. Or actually, there is no absolute pressure. We can measure the differences in the pressure by comparing them with some other systems. Or some other pressures. 

We think the universe is a bubble in the middle of total emptiness. In our models' universe is the bubble in a vacuum that pulls energy or wave movement travels away from it. And that causes cosmic inflation. So in the universe is overpressure that pushes wave movement to the vacuum around it. And that means the universe is like a balloon that expands forever or ends its life in the Big Crunch. That end depends on the geometrical shape of the universe. 

But then we can ask if the middle of nothing is the universe's position, what means nothingness? And here, I don't mean multiverse. The density of the material is relative. When we are in Earth's atmosphere we know that we are in the middle of emptiness. When we dive into the swimming pool or in the water we can think that water continues forever.

 So if we would be like fishes, and lived our entire life in water, we might think that atmosphere is low pressure or a vacuum. But for the creature. For those who live outside the water on drylands, the atmosphere's pressure and density are normal, because that creature is in the gas. And that creature thinks that the vacuum begins in space. 

And when we travel outside our atmosphere we think again that we are in a vacuum. So here you can see that vacuum is relative. When we are in the middle of the system we are hard to estimate its thickness and density. 

We can think that water and air are systems. And dimensions are like water and air. If we are in the middle of water we are hard to estimate the density of water. For estimating some system's density we must step out from the system. That we can compare their differences. For us, water is denser than air. But for fish, it doesn't feel denser than anything else. The reason for that is fish spend their entire life in the water. 

The same way we are living in the universe our entire life. We cannot see another system than the universe where we are living. That's why we cannot measure the differences between the universe and the space around it. 

There must be something where we can compare that thing.  If we are in the water, we can estimate the density of water by comparing it with air.  We must compare that thing to something. So that's the reason why space outside Earth's atmosphere seems empty, but in real life that is away from emptiness. 

So in this model, there is material or wave movement outside the universe. The universe would be in the middle of the giant superstring that is so weak that wave movement from the universe pushes it away. So that means there is the possibility that the universe is in the middle of extremely large, and thick waves. 

If we think this wave is the third dimension we can say that dimension itself is material. And the material can form in the dimension because the dimension is not empty. This explains why the universe formed in the third dimension from the thing that seems empty. 

NASA discovered organic molecules from asteroid Ryugu.

"This conceptual image illustrates the types of organic molecules found in the sample of asteroid Ryugu collected by Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft. Organics are the building blocks of all known forms of terrestrial life and consist of a wide variety of compounds made of carbon combined with hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and other atoms. However, organic molecules can also be created by non-living processes, such as chemical reactions in asteroids. Credit: NASA/JAXA/Dan Gallagher" (ScitechDaily.com/NASA Discovers Organic Molecules on Asteroid Ryugu, Bolstering Theory of Extraterrestrial Life Ingredients)

There are organic molecules in samples that NASA and the Japanese space agency brought from asteroid Ryugu. That thing boosts theories about the origin of life in space. And one of the most fundamental things in the search for extraterrestrial lifeforms is that nobody laughs. It's the possibility that even in our solar system are some kind of primitive lifeforms more than on one planet. 

If the alien organisms have no enemies that allow them to keep their population alive even if there are no large habitable areas on some planets. Organic molecules are not telling that somewhere are alien lifeforms. But those molecules are supporting theories that even under the icy shells of some asteroids like Ceres could be some kind of proteobacteria. The thing is that there are lots of theories about alien lifeforms. 

And there is the possibility that some kind of viruses can keep their genomes in the form that they could infect organisms on Earth. The cosmic virus is one of the things that could tell that there are other living organisms somewhere in the universe. The virus requires living cells so that it can create descendants. And that means the viruses prove that there are at least primitive lifeforms. 

Astrovirology searches for viruses from space. 

When some probe finds viruses from another planet. That probe must find the bacteria too. Without those bacteria, viruses cannot produce descendants. 

And if there are only viruses on some planet, that thing means that those viruses are coming from somewhere else. And that forms new questions. If somewhere are only viruses that means something removed bacteria. 

But even if we would find viruses from another planet there is always the possibility that some of those viruses are from Earth. But the thing is that. There is required more information. Some DNA sample does not include enough data for confirming that the virus is from another planet or Earth.

When researchers find meteorites were is bacteria fossils. There is a possibility that the bacteria are from Earth. They should see that meteorite is falling. Same way meteorites could throw bacteria and viruses into space. And some of those creatures could fly to icy moons like Europa. 

The very interesting thing is when those organic amino acids turn into RNA and DNA molecules. I believe that the very first organisms on Earth used RNA as genetic material. And then the second question is when those primitive genomes start to form the shell for the organisms. RNA or DNA requires the organelles to form that protein shells.

https://astronomy.com/news/2018/01/the-hunt-for-viruses-in-space

https://www.space.com/interstellar-panspermia-earth-life-oumuamua.html

https://scitechdaily.com/nasa-discovers-organic-molecules-on-asteroid-ryugu-bolstering-theory-of-extraterrestrial-life-ingredients/

In some visions, alien creatures can make interstellar travel in the form of viruses that can transform the host creature into an alien. 

Then we have one theory that I want to introduce to you. There is a model that the alien creature can make interstellar travels in the form of viruses. That virus could have a genetic code that destroys the DNA of the host cell and then makes the cell into another organism. Then that creature turns to that alien. 

After that, that alien civilization could transfer the necessary knowledge to those creatures by using video screens. Or maybe they could transfer the necessary information by using EEG stimulation. That allows the alien creature to spread into the entire galaxy even if they do not have faster-than-light technology. The DNA can stay in form extremely long time. Especially, if it's properly protected. The AI-controlled probe can make that kind of thing possible. 

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Successfully working AI offers flexible and effective solutions, especially in dangerous work.

  Successfully working AI offers flexible and effective solutions, especially in dangerous work. 

The U.S. Navy's first independently operating surface vessel enters the service. Robot warships are extremely powerful systems if their technology works. As somebody suspected, navies are the first users for independently operating robots. 

The ships offer large spaces and guaranteed electric support for high-power computers. Those high-power computers are required for driving complicated computer code. The large-size warships can act as drone carriers. But those warships can also have 3D printer tools for creating custom drones and repairing parts for manned and unmanned systems. 

But when we are looking at the military systems, we must realize that the military tells about those systems only things that they must tell. The Turkish navy plans to equip its aircraft carrier with drones. And that tells, something about their effectiveness. 

But then we must realize that the U.S. Navy, along with some contractors are developing robot submarines. "Orca" class submarines are highly classified. The "Orca" itself is a miniature submarine, but there could be projects where full-scale nuclear submarines operate as AUVs (Autonomous Underwater Vessels). 

There are two types of robot systems. Fully autonomous. And semi-autonomous systems. 'The semi-automatic systems are highly automatized systems where the minimum crew operates those vessels. Theoretically, one man can operate full-scale nuclear submarines. Some of those semi-autonomous systems are vessels in which computer-based systems are operated remotely. Or AI operates secondary systems like anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems.

But fully autonomous systems are more effective. The systems are less vulnerable to electronic warfare. And they can operate basically in the same missions as manned systems. 

https://www.defensenews.com/smr/unmanned-unleashed/2018/02/23/for-the-army-a-3d-printed-drone-is-nice-a-customized-3d-printed-drone-is-better/

https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/3d-printed-military-drones-assembled-in-a-matter-of-hours

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a43033206/navy-ship-can-operate-autonomously-for-30-days/

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/navys-85-foot-orca-unmanned-submarine-will-be-a-minelayer-first

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orca_(AUV)

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Chat GPT and other artificial intelligence platforms are still under development.

Chat GPT and other artificial intelligence platforms are still under development. 

Some experts say that AI is still the grab. But otherwise, that kinds of artificial intelligence tools are good tools for bringing customers to homepages. Along with AI, the company can market its other products to customers. Those customers bring data for the system, that can use for R&D work in the AI-development. 

The fact is that AI is still under development. And that means there is lots of work to do if we want to make AI that can go shopping independently or that can discuss with people like real people. The next-generation version of AI-based bots can create programming code independently. 

And that is a very big thing, and it decreases the use of the workhours. But then the AI requires development so that it can make works independently. When something goes wrong the first thing that should do is search for what went wrong. If the AI is not complete, it would not give any answers. 

When the developer develops the AI. There could be radio buttons in the correction box. From those buttons, the developer could select would that person wants to correct the answer's grammar, vocabulary, or involvement.

When we develop something. We must remember that success is not the news. We see stories of malfunctioning systems. When we are reading about cars, we see many stories of accidents. Nobody is interested in those billions of successful driving hours. We see only cases where something or somebody makes mistake causing terrible accidents. 

 If the AI makes one mistake in 50 000 0000 operations, that thing can bring very big headlines for stories. But the fact is that AI is an impressive tool if we want to bring customers for other products. That kind of thing is interesting. And one interesting version of the business model is voluntary development or "open application development". 

In that model voluntary development brings more rights to use AI. So, when the AI gives the wrong answer or says something wrong, the developer opens the form and then corrects the answer. There could be "radio buttons" in that box where the developer can choose what type of corrections will be made to that answer. 

And if the answer is some kind of question about information, sources like used homepages are good to connect that answer. And if the grammar is wrong the developer would just push the button and tell the machine what it should say. And how it should say that thing. 

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Researchers simulated neutron stars. And this new thing can also revolutionize material and engine technology.

"Researchers have successfully synthesized an exotic, but very short-lived, Lambda resonance known as Λ(1405) for the first time".(ScitechDaily.com/ Astral Alchemy: Researchers Synthesize Mysterious Exotic Baryon)

The Lambda resonance Λ(1405) can be the key to next-generation stealth systems. And it can make material that can resist almost everything. 

The image above introduces Lambda resonance Λ(1405). Those electromagnetic fields are acting like wheels. That is driving wave movement between them. This kind of system can be key to next-generation stealth and engine systems. If those wheels drive all wave movements behind them. That makes material invisible. 

So if that field pair will hangs in graphene. That thing makes it possible to drive energy through the material in one direction. So that kind of possibility increases the material's ability to resist things like energy impacts. 

If that kind of quantum wheel is possible to create and they can keep its form long enough, that thing makes it possible that the system can drive all energy that impacts it through it immediately. So the system cannot get free energy that rips it into pieces. 

The Λ(1405) can use also be in the new type of engines. If the aircraft's entire shell is covered by graphene these quantum wheels. That allows the system can aim energy in any direction. And it can make it possible to create new highly maneuverable aircraft systems. But that requires the Λ(1405) to exist longer time. 

The researchers created the Λ(1405) for research on the abilities of the extremely thick material in neutron stars. Neutron stars are incredible things. And one interesting thing is why a neutron star doesn't explode even if energy impacts the middle of it. The neutron star has almost always energy peaks which can explain why the energy level doesn't rise too high that it rips the neutron star in pieces. 

And one interesting question is what is the depth where those radiation peaks begin? There is the possibility that the free energy level in neutron stars rises so high and so fast that it destroys the entire neutron structure. 

In some models, the nuclear reaction that happens around the neutron star impacts energy symmetrically in its nucleus. And then reflection causes a thing called a kilonova. The power of kilonova is enormous. The impact causes a situation. Where gold and iron form in the material clouds around the kilonova. Normally kilonovas form when neutron stars collide. But if a lonely neutron star can turn to kilonova. That is an interesting model.  

https://scitechdaily.com/astral-alchemy-researchers-synthesize-mysterious-exotic-baryon/

Kardachev scale 7 civilization

 Kardachev scale 7 civilization

The Kardachev scale 7 civilization would be something that we cannot even realize. That civilization could jump between the third and fourth dimensions. And the question is, could that civilization jump back to the fourth dimension without destroying itself? 

In some theories, angels are creatures that are from the fourth dimension. So in those models, ghosts and angels are the same things. If a creature comes out from the fourth dimension. It shines because energy travels outside its body. 

When something drops out from the fourth dimension to the third dimension. The situation is similar to jumping down from the upper floor. The thing that comes down from that upper energy level must transfer energy somewhere. The jump itself will not destroy the jumper, the thing that destroys the creature is the slowing. If the speed stops too fast it increases free energy in the system. And that rips the system into pieces. 

In this case, energy travels out from that creature at extremely high speed. So could that creature stay living? That depends on how slowly it can release its energy. If the creature can deliver energy out from its body slowly enough. That allows it to remain in one piece.  So the creature must have a system that controls energy flow from it. 

When we think about the situation in which the creature comes out from the fourth dimension, we cannot destroy that creature. In that case, the creature would have so a high energy level that nothing can transfer energy to it. We would see that creature shining because energy travels out from it. 

The only thing that this creature must be afraid of is the Bose-Einstein condensate. If the creature jumps over the Bose-Einstein condensate it delivers its energy with enormous speed.  And that causes destruction. 

"Santa Claus" machines and nanotechnology.

Image: BigThink.com/German scientists 3D print objects with “acoustic holograms”

Acoustic holograms can make the "Santa Claus" machine possible. 

"The team was able to use their technique to print 3D objects from solid microparticles, hydrogel beads, and even biological cells — contact-free (bar the sound waves, of course)". (BigThink.com/German scientists 3D print objects with “acoustic holograms)

The acoustic pressure systems can use to model metals or ceramics. In the most conventional versions, the LRAD systems can use air as the hammer that models the ceramics or even metals and carbon fiber. 

Acoustic holograms are 3D-shaped pressure fields created by high-accurate sound waves. Those pressure fields act like hydraulic presses. And they can create physical merchandise by pressing the plastic foam or plastic fog created by using high-temperature systems. 

The acoustic holograms can make things even from metal dust or metal vapor in extremely high temperatures. In some visions, laser rays are vaporizing metals of carbon fibers. And then the pressure system starts to press that vapor. The system creates acoustic holograms by using synchronized extremely small-size LRAD systems. That the 3D printing systems can make the right pressure shape. 

But nanotechnology needs even more fundamental tools.

Most nanomachines are created by using carbon. In modern nanotechnical systems, the laser and highly accurate electron rays are used as billiard sticks that push carbon dioxide molecules into the right positions. The carbon and oxygen atoms are creating new types of materials that can be used in nanorobots. 

The carbon molecule chains can use in the shell or structures in nanomachines. The nanomachines can form larger structures. And in some visions, the nanomachines can use to create metal plates that fix themselves automatically. 

AI-controlled systems have no limits. They can create small protein fibers. Those proteins can use as nanomachines by connecting some enzymes to them. In some wildest visions, those proteins are covered by magnesite, and they can operate as miniature mass memories that control nano-sized robots. 

In those cases, protein acts like a miniature tape drive. That can control microchips. And those microchips can drive cell-size cyborgs to the right positions. Those cyborg cells can be macrophages that clean blood systems. In some other versions, the artificial DNA controls those systems. Maybe somewhere in the future. The living neurons can control nanomachines. That allows us to create a structure that can be as highly intelligent as humans. 

The acoustic systems can protect the manufacturing process of those machines. They can protect the platforms that might hover in the chamber where the electrons and photons are pushing the nanomachines in the right positions. Nanomachines and nanotechnology are tools that have no limits. 

Some nanomachines are not even work in high temperatures. Those low-temperature operating systems can hover above the superconducting layer. And they can use to move other molecules. But maybe in the future, those nanorobots can participate the missions to frozen moons like Triton at the solar system's edge. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/3d-printing-acoustic-holograms/

https://scitechdaily.com/limitless-possibilities-ai-technology-generates-original-proteins-from-scratch/

https://scitechdaily.com/electronics-breakthrough-scientists-generate-shortest-electron-burst-yet/

https://scitechdaily.com/putting-carbon-dioxide-to-good-scientists-use-electrochemistry-to-convert-carbon-to-useful-molecules/

Quantum entanglement can also transport information in binary systems.

 Quantum entanglement can also transport information in binary systems. 

The binary system can use quantum teleportation. As well as quantum systems can use the same thing. The binary system can use the system where two energy levels are determined as zero and one. 

But there is another way to make a binary system that can transport data. The idea is that the system uses two frequencies. The frequency one means zero. And frequency two means one. And how the system can sort the zero and one in the right order? 

The idea is that when electricity is on in wire one that means zero for the computer. And when the electricity is cut. That means that the data sequence is ending. Every zero and one is equipped with a serial number. 

***************************************************

"Researchers at the University of Rochester developed a new method for manipulating information in quantum systems by controlling the spin of electrons in silicon quantum dots. Electrons in silicon experience a phenomenon called spin-valley coupling between their spin (up and down arrows) and valley states (blue and red orbitals)". 

"When researchers apply a voltage (blue glow) to electrons in silicon, they harness the spin-valley coupling effect and can manipulate the spin and valley states, controlling the electron spin. Credit: University of Rochester illustration / Michael Osadciw" (ScitechDaily.com/Overcoming Quantum Limitations: A New Method To Control Electron Spin)

***************************************************

That allows the system to sort them in the right order. And then the receiving system can connect the message to the entirety. The system bases the sliding window that is cutting the message in pieces. And every bit in that system is equipped with a serial number. 

If the system needs jumping frequencies. The bit must equip information on what channel the receiving system must select. And that makes this system more secure than a regular communication system. 

The data transmission can send through the hollow laser or maser rays. And that makes outsiders unable to see that data transmission. 

Because the information travels in two channels the eavesdropper it hard to follow that communication. The frequencies can replace by using two wires. Or the system can use two superpositioned and entangled electrons. When energy impulse impacts those electrons it makes them flash. 

A new method for controlling an electron's spin can make a new quantum solution possible. 

The ability to control electrons' spin is always connected with quantum computers. In that version, the system can turn two superpositioned electrons against each other. And that thing forms the quantum wormhole. And if there are two photons. Trapped on both sides of that energy bridge. This makes it possible that the photonic quantum entanglement is pulled through that channel. 

The ability to send information through that kind of channel is always interesting because that electromagnetic wormhole is protecting photonic quantum entanglement. But the ability to control electrons' spin always makes it possible to use them in data transportation. In that model, the binary system uses quantum teleportation in the form I wrote at the beginning of this text. 

https://scitechdaily.com/overcoming-quantum-limitations-a-new-method-to-control-electron-spin/

Acoustic and electromagnetic wormholes are interesting communication tools.

In the beginning, I must say one thing. The term Faster-than-light communication means that photons are traveling faster than usual. In underwater conditions, the system can make acoustic channels through the water. And in that case, even an electron can travel faster than it travels in water. 

Researchers made acoustic and electromagnetic wormholes in laboratories. In those situations, the wormhole means a channel where liquid water or some kind of electromagnetic radiation like magnetic fields are forming a channel through the air or some other medium. There is the possibility that the wormhole is made through the liquid like low-pressure ultra-cold water by making the acoustic channel through the liquid and then the magnetic tornado is drilled through that channel. 

The idea is that when the power of another magnet is lower than another it creates a situation where information travels like in wormholes. The system can create this electromagnetic part of a "wormhole" by using magnets that are rotating in opposite directions. 

But why that kinds of wormholes are interesting? They can use in quantum computers to protect the qubits and quantum entanglements. If the quantum entanglement is made through an extremely cold liquid like low-pressure water or liquid hydrogen that protects the qubit from outcoming anomalies. 

The acoustic wormholes can use to test some physical theories. In these kinds of systems, electrons are shot in the acoustic wormhole. And then that wormhole suddenly closed. At that moment. The electron travels faster than light in a very short moment and it sends cherenkov's radiation. 

But acoustic wormholes allow for the creation of underwater or extremely protected radio communication. In this kind of system acoustic systems make a channel through water or air. Then the highly accurate radio-maser signal is sent through that channel. That makes it possible to communicate through that channel by using radio- or laser signals. 

At the beginning of this text, I wrote that the term "faster than light communication" means a situation in which a photon travels faster than otherwise. That situation can form underwater conditions simply by making an acoustic channel in the water, and then an electron or laser ray will shoot through that channel. In some very interesting models, the system makes acoustic channels in water or ice. And then it creates a vacuum in that channel. The hollow laser ray can travel through that channel and protect the qubits. 

The electromagnetic wormhole can revolutionize astronomy. 

Faster-than-light communication through the small-size electromagnetic tornado is one of the most interesting phenomena that can make many fundamental things. In some models far from the Sun is created the gravitational telescope. The telescope could use laser rays made between miniature probes positioned in Kuiper's belt. 

If that system sees some kind of gravitational burst it can send information about that gravitational eruption to Earth. That allows the astronomers to turn their telescopes to that burst. The same way GRB and XRB (Gamma- and X-ray Bursts) can observe by using a similar way. The distant telescope sees those bursts. And then they send information about that thing to telescopes that are closer to Earth.  But there is a problem with those kinds of systems. 

The speed of communication or information carrier is limited to the speed of light. So if the system can create a channel where are no quantum fields or scattering. That thing allows the system can send the message. That comes before the signal that the system should observe. So if the system can make informed travel to Earth before the XRB and GRB, it can make it possible to observe those signals more effectively. 

Boullée's tomb.

Boullée, Cénotaphe à Newton (1784)

Boullée's sphere is one of the most remarkable architectural plans. But this structure remained as drawings. It was never finished. But that shape lives in nuclear reactor's geometrical safe buildings. 

Étienne-Louis Boullée's (1728-1799) plans for a tomb for Isaac Newton was the ball-shaped monument building that ever made. That tomb is planned as being a ball-shaped structure and one sure thing. I don't know. Did Boullée realize that the echoes from the walls can form an acoustic ball in the middle of the structure? 

The Boullée's tomb was not complete in real life. It was only paper on the desk. There is one problem with spherical houses which form echoes. Those ball structures can form an acoustic black hole in the middle of them. 

An acoustic black hole means a situation where symmetrically coming soundwaves are impacting and that thing causes a situation, where the air cannot fill that point. So the acoustic black hole is the vacuum that is formed when a ball-shaped soundwave or pressure wave travels in the ball-shaped structure. When air molecules are pressed tight enough and there is impacting new soundwaves they form the standing wave movement. 

If there is a generator in the middle of that sphere, the question is: how powerful an electric field can that thing create? When electricity travels to the walls of that sphere, it jumps in the middle of it. That thing can form an extremely powerful standing electromagnetic field in the middle of the sphere. 

And then if the soundwave cannot release its energy it forms a situation in that the ball-shaped standing wave starts to expand outwards. That causes a similar effect as detonation. If that kind of standing ball-shaped wave is forming it gets more energy from Earth's rotation and seismic waves. And it starts to send the wave movement to the walls of the ball, and then those reflecting wave movements are increasing their power. 

There is a possibility that Boullée wanted to use his sphere for loading energy to small mountain crystals bites. Those pressure impacts could turn those crystals shine or send flashes of lightning around the sphere. If lighting hits that sphere it forms an electromagnetic bubble in the middle of the sphere. 

The Boulée tomb gave its form to some nuclear laboratories. The Kesselring facility holds a spherical structure that is made for fusion experiments. And in the national ignition facility is a spherical fusion chamber. The idea is that the middle of that building can create a symmetrical spherical energy impact. The system can focus that energy on the center of the sphere. The system can use lasers- microwaves, and radio waves. And it's mission is to aim the energy to small fusion material bottles. 

https://www.archdaily.com/544946/ad-classics-cenotaph-for-newton-etienne-louis-boullee

https://bigthink.com/high-culture/architecture-buildings-never-built/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89tienne-Louis_Boull%C3%A9e

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Genetic engineering always causes discussions of the super soldiers.

Do you remember moon-nazis from the movie "Iron Sky"? Normally we think. That those fictional creatures grew in weak gravitation. And that makes them unable to operate on the ground. But the fact is that technical equipment like HULC-type exoskeleton robots can make it possible that even a creature that is from weak gravitation can operate on the ground. 

Today I saw a story about super soldiers. There are two ways to create super soldiers. The first one is to make the mechanic or technical solutions that make those soldiers invisible. That solution could be the nerve-implanted microchip that controls some kind of space suit. 

In that model, the soldier wears the moon suit. Which uses a HULC-type exoskeleton robot to make the operator able to work on the ground. That kind of suit is possible to transform into armor. And the neuro-implanted microchips allow to use the of robot groups and drone swarms along with this suit. That thing is the technical version of the super soldiers. 

The idea for that system is taken from the "Brain in jar model". 

The most powerful tool for the technical version of the super soldier is the cyborg with the human brain. In that model, the robot body is connected with living human brain tissue. And that makes it the same way intelligent as humans. The brain controls the robot body by using an EEG signal. The robot body requires only the tank which hosts living bone marrow and a system that delivers nutrients for living neurons.''

That bone marrow is needed to transfer nutrients and oxygen to living neurons. And that system produces also immune cells to protect the brain cells. The oxygen can transfer to blood by using the heart-lung machine that is inside the robot's body. The operator can stay outside the robot and control the robot by using BCI (Brain Computer Interface). 

Another way is to use selection where the most capable soldiers are making descendants with the siblings of the other most capable soldiers. In this model, the gametes of military personnel are taken into the freezer. And then the manipulator selects the most capable of those volunteers. 

But then another version is genetically engineered humans. In this model, the human body is connected with genomes from another species. Genetic engineering allows creating the humans whose muscles are taken from anacondas. What would you make with supersonic muscles? Those muscles can make a person a little bit different than in some other models. 

Or in their genomes is connected the genetic code that makes dogs so obedient. Many animals can have abilities that can be suitable for humans. And genetic engineering makes it possible to connect those abilities in the human body and mind. 

https://futurism.com/neoscope/scientist-tweaks-genetically-altered-supersoldiers

Dark energy and the shape of the universe.

Could the universe be egg-shaped? 

Could the cosmic microwave background explain some errors and anomalies in calculations? We can see two symmetrically cold areas that are in line at the left and right sides of the image. That could tell that there is a giant black hole in the middle of the universe. That hyper-massive black hole could form when just after the Big Bang part of the material dropped back. And that material formed an enormous black hole in history. The cosmic gamma- and X-ray backgrounds tell that there could be a point where that radiation leaves. 

And those cold points seem to be in line with gamma- and X-ray radiation. If the source of those gammas- and X-rays are black holes, where they are leaving from their poles, that radiation could turn the universe into a little bit of egg-looking structure. And that means we are at the equator of that hypothetical black hole. So could that thing cause us to overestimate some distances? That means we thought that the visible universe is a sphere. But it's an egg-looking structure. 

(Credit: NASA / GSFC)

If there is a black hole in the middle of the universe it sends gamma- and X-rays to the plasma or shockwave that travels in front of visible material. Then that plasma shockwave that is formed during the Big Bang sends part of that radiation back into the universe. And that reflection causes dark energy. The thing is that this shockwave is traveling with limited speed, and the universe's gravitational effect slows the speed of that thing. In the same way, it limits the speed of photons that travels ahead of the material because the gravitational effect slows the speed of photons if it is the backside of the photons. 

Above From the top: Cosmic gamma-ray, X-ray, and microwave background. There is a theory that forming galaxies creates that gamma-ray. But that linear form could tell that there is some extremely large-size black hole in the middle of the universe. 

In the X-ray image (middle) you can see how the X-rays are spread around the universe. And in the cosmic microwave backgroung (bottom) the cold areas that I mentioned are marked by using green arrows. 

"The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.

From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space." (Wikipedia/Shape of the universe)

Can we eliminate dark energy? 

The expansion of the universe doesn't match with calculations. And the universe expands too slowly. So that means in the universe is too little dark energy or the weight of the universe is somehow too big. 

Which one is right? Or is that error or difference between theories and reality virtual? When we think. That the visible universe is like a ball, we face a very interesting model that could explain why calculations do not match. 

When photons travel from another side of the universe. The gravitational force from those galaxies and other objects is slowing those photons. And if there is some kind of unseen structure that thing can cause problems or errors in measurement. And the gravitational effect can turn redshift higher than it is. So is the universe just smaller than it should be? 

Or are there dark matter clouds behind the galaxies on another side of the universe? That means the universe looks like a galaxy. There could be a ball of visible material. And around it is a large cloud of dark matter. And in that model dark matter forms a gigantic version of the Kuiper Belt.  

Image: Wikipedia/Castle Romeo)

The nuclear test in the Pacific proving ground. Note the donut-shaped structure. A similar structure is an asteroid belt that formed when fusion reactions started in the Sun. So, could the Big Bang form a similar structure in the universe? Could that mega-size asteroid belt exist? 

Or are we just misunderstanding the form of the universe? Is the universe look donut? 

When we are thinking about the geometrical shape of the universe, nobody ever thought that the universe could be a donut-looking structure. In that model, the visible material is like a donut-shaped ring around the center of the universe. But the problem is how much there is dark material in the universe. 

And how strong the dark matter interaction is? In some models, dark matter is only the virtual material. That forms when gravitational waves are impacting. That thing explains why we cannot see dark matter. In that model dark matter is the bubble or gravitational skyrmion. In that case, dark matter does not exist in the material form. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/eliminate-dark-energy/

https://cerncourier.com/a/elephants-in-the-gamma-ray-sky/

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/diffuse_background2.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background

The event horizon is a standing gravitational wave.

The event horizon is the point around the black hole where escape velocity reaches the speed of light. But what is the event horizon, and what it's form is? If we think. Gravitational waves are reflecting wave movement the source is in the middle of the black hole, we can say that the event horizon is the impact point, where radiation that drops behind the event horizon collide with gravitational radiation that comes from inside the black hole. That forms the standing gravitational wave. 

The black hole's gravitational field is enormous. Even light cannot escape from those most extreme objects in the universe. The point where escaping velocity reaches the speed of light is called the event horizon. The black holes are forming gravitational waves. That thing means that there is wave movement in the black hole. But there still are the waves in the black hole. 

Image 2 introduces how seismic waves travel inside Earth. All wave movement travels similarly. Seismic waves form on Earth and other planets in similar forms. And gravitation is also wave movement. 

So we can think that gravitational waves can form similar forms in black holes and neutron stars as they form in less extreme objects. The requirement that the wave's form is similar to Earth's is there is a denser object inside the larger object. Or the speed of wave movement must be different than around that denser object. 

Image 3 A

Image 3 B

Image 4 C

Image 4 D

Images 4 (C and D) S waves follow a spiral or rotational trajectory. The Coriolis force on a black hole is extremely powerful. And it can turn gravitational waves or gravitational superstrings into rope-looking forms. When the maser-effect impacts those superstring clusters they can turn into wormholes. 

Those waves act like P and S waves. That means there is a series of gravitational waves on the event horizon and inside it that form horizontally. Even in the strongest gravitational fields, horizontal movement is possible. 

When we look at the S-wave's model the impacting energy pike that comes from the black hole's nucleus can form the tornado-shaped structure. So could that S-wave cause a gravitational tornado that lets gamma and X-rays travel out from the black hole's poles? 

In that form the S-wave forms a channel that allows the wave movement to travel out from the black hole. If that kind of radiation channel exists. There is a massive maser effect in that thing. The side-coming gravitational waves carry another wave movement that increases the power of the radiation that travels through that tornado. 

That gravitational tornado can form S-waves that impact other horizontal waves. And then that thing causes effects that gravitational waves impact together and form gravitational hills on the black hole. 

When wave movement hits a black hole it should interact with that object as it travels on Earth. So part of the wave movement travels past the black hole's nucleus. If we use the model that wave movement reflects to form the black hole's nucleus we can understand why gravitation waves can escape from the black hole. 

The side-coming wave movement allows the wave movement. That falls in the black hole can ride with reflecting waves. When reflecting wave impacts with falling wave movement it forms a standing wave. If outcoming radiation cannot break that barrier standing waveforms incoming radiation pushes the standing wave out from the black hole. That means we can think that the event horizon is like the barrier of gravitational waves. As I wrote at the beginning of this text. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

JWST discovered galaxies that should not exist.

How galaxy can be older than it should be? Are there some massive objects behind the distant galaxies? If the black hole is behind the star or galaxy it can stretch the light. That means the redshift of those galaxies seems stronger than it is. And that thing can make galaxies seem more distant than they are. 

How galaxy or star can be older than it should be? There is the possibility that light travels slower from those objects than it should. The speed of light is the cosmic constant. But the speed of light depends on the gravitation, quantum fields, and scattering effect. 

So if there are some very massive objects like black holes behind those galaxies. That thing makes light travel slower than it should. And massive objects behind distant galaxies can make galaxies virtually older than they are. But what that invisible and powerful effect could be? There is a possibility that this kind of effect is proof of the multiverse. 

At this moment, I must say that light travels past multiple objects. And some of them are extremely massive. That means the direction of those photons is not straight. And those black holes and neutron stars affect the speed of those photons. 

Of course, galaxies and their black holes affect the speed of photons that are traveling away from them. So maybe somebody miscalculated the weight of those galaxies. 

In modern models universe is in the middle of an electromagnetic vacuum. And that vacuum causes a situation where electrons and other particles travel out from the universe. So could that vacuum around the universe make a situation where photons collide? That kind of collimation can slow the speed of those photons. 

But the distant galaxies far away from another side of the universe are traveling away from us with enormous speed. In that model, the galaxies' gravitation makes the situation. That photons are traveling slower in our direction than otherwise. At this moment I must say that even a small difference in speed in that enormous distance is causing big changes in measurement. 

But in the most fascinating theories the galaxy formed before the Big Bang. There is a small possibility that material existed before the Big Bang. But that theory is a little bit more fundamental to us. 

https://scitechdaily.com/in-massive-galactic-discovery-webb-spots-super-old-galaxies-that-shouldnt-exist-its-bananas/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift

Physicists isolated and made pairs of ultracold atoms to research the P-wave interaction.

Above this text is an image of the seismic wave travel on Earth. When incoming seismic waves impact two points on the Earth's shell. They cause a situation. where waves travel against each other. That effect forms the standing wave between those points. And all wave movement acts the same way. 

This is the story of the P and S wave interaction in seismology. When Earthquake waves impact the earth's shell that thing causes the S and P waves. S waves are transverse waves. And P waves are longitudinal primary waves. All wave movement is similar. There are also S- and P waves in magnetic fields. The same things that are causing earthquakes are limiting the time of quantum entanglement. 

"Plane P wave" (Wikipedia / Pwave)

"Representation of the propagation of a P wave on a 2D grid (empirical shape)" (Wikipedia / P wave)

Diagram 1 (a and b)shows the movement of P waves. 

"Plane shear wave" Wikipedia /S wave)

"Propagation of a spherical S wave in a 2d grid (empirical model)" (Wikipedia / S wave) Notice: the S wave's  rotational trajectory. 

Diagram 2 ( c and  d) shows the movement of S waves. 

Diagram 3 shows how the impacting wave movement forms the standing wave. The standing wave collects energy until it can press the energy that travels in it back to the direction where it comes. 

Those images are taken from pages that handle seismology. But P and S waves are acting similarly in all systems. When P waves are moving in the system they travel in straight lines. 

S waves are forming when pressure waves impact to shell at one point. That forms a spherically expanding wave. The difference between spherically expanding S- and P waves is that S-waves follow rotational trajectories.  The impacts of S- and P waves are forming a standing wave. 

The P wave is well-known in seismology. They are longitudinal waves. And in quantum systems, is also longitudinal P waves. And S waves are transverse waves. The P-waves are one of the reasons why quantum systems are breaking. '

Or actually, when the electromagnetic waves are scattered from the object that is in the middle of the system. They form impacting S and P waves. Those impacting waves are destroying the quantum entanglements. 

The P waves can use to aim certain parts of nanomachines in the right position. In that case, the system can put the nanomachine behind the particle. And extremely weak P waves can use to accurately the angle of atoms into a certain position. 

By connecting two or three atoms is possible to create the quantum radar. Or quantum scanner. The idea is that those two or three atoms are orbiting the tower of atoms. That thing is similar to a scanning tunneling microscope. But it uses three atoms that act like some extremely small radar antenna. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z2dtv9q/revision/3

https://scitechdaily.com/a-perfect-little-system-physicists-isolate-a-pair-of-atoms-to-observe-p-wave-interaction-strength-for-the-first-time/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_wave

Weaponizing spike protein against infecting virus itself could be the next-generation tool for vaccines and antivirus medicals.

"New research introduces the possibility that the virus' spike protein can turn against itself". (ScitechDaily.com/Outsmarting COVID-19: Weaponizing the Spike Protein Against Itself To Prevent Infection)

First, when we see the ideas like making the virus' spike protein make the "U"-turn and then destroy the virus' structure and genomes, we can think that this is a little bit too absurd. But there is the possibility. To connect some chemical marks to those spike proteins, which makes them unable to work. There is the possibility that vaccines that can connect small DNA bites to the cells can make the cell turn to destroy that spike protein. 

And that makes the virus unable to transfer its genome to cells. The spike protein can also connect to a chemical mark that makes an immune defense attack infected cells. The problem is how to connect those chemical marks to a virus population that is large enough. There is also the possibility to connect another protein to the spike protein, and when the spike protein impacts the cell that second protein's nano strings will be open, and it destroys the spike protein. 

The new antivirus medical base is the inhibitors. Those inhibitors deactivate the interaction between some proteins like spike proteins that virus uses to transfer their genomes to cells. In some other cases, the medicine transforms the ion pumps of the cells to destroy the genetic material that is in the virus. If the virus uses certain ion pumps. The medicine's molecule can be like a nano spring. Then that molecule will stand in the position over this ion pump. When a virus tries to transfer its genomes to the cell that nano spring jumps up. 

The molecule acts like a small drill that pushes back against the genetic material that the virus transfer to the cell. And then, it destroys the genetic material. In some versions, the spike protein will activate that nano spring. There is also the possibility that genetic code will make the cell itself destroy the spike proteins when it starts to produce viruses. That means the infected cell cannot produce viruses that can transfer their genomes to another cell. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-universal-vaccine-new-computer-model-of-flu-virus-shows-promise/

https://scitechdaily.com/outsmarting-covid-19-weaponizing-the-spike-protein-against-itself-to-prevent-infection/

The world is going to universal vaccines. 

The world is going to universal virus vaccines. The new laser- and scanning tunneling microscopes are making it possible to research viruses more accurately. Those new microscopes can observe the cases like when the virus enters cells. And those observations can transfer to computer models and simulations. If multiple viruses use the same spike protein to transfer their genomes to the cells. 

That spike protein can use as a mark for immune cells. That thing makes it possible that the same vaccines can affect multiple viruses. Creating medicines against viruses is a similar process to vaccine creation. Some antivirus medicines are antibodies that are created by using cell cultures. The antivirus medical can act in three ways. 

1) The medicine can affect straight to the virus. In that case, some nanotechnical particles are connected to viruses. And then acoustic systems cause resonance that destroys the structure of those viruses. 

2) The medicine can mark viruses for immune cells. The idea is that medicine activates the immune system to fight against viruses more aggressively. The medicine is a little bit like a vaccine. 

3) The highly advanced genetically engineered virus can connect to the DNA that is infected with the virus' DNA. In that case, the DNA will turn the cell to acid for creating viruses. If the PH level of the cell is too low the cell itself may destroy viruses. But that thing is a very futuristic model. 

Producing medicals against viruses is difficult. The problem is that viruses have no metabolism. That means medicals cannot affect viruses the same way as they affect bacteria. 

"The Barge Haulers on the Volga" can show the problem of the entire Russian society.

The worst problem in Russia is that it cannot respond to modern technology. Russian products are raw materials like oil and gas. And they buy almost all microchips and other technology from the west. The lack of modern technology is seen in Ukraine's conflict. But the problems are deeper in Russian society. We must realize that society and nations are much more than some military forces. 

The lack of microchips is visible in many things. Modern civil and military systems require microchips because they are using AI. AI is impossible to use without computers. But the problem is that the Russians are not putting resources into that technology. Everything that is not visible is neglect. 

That thing is not seen only in the Russian military. It's visible in the entire society. Russia is like a barge haul that its people are pulling to the past. That thing requires lots of work, and sooner or later those people who are resisting the change are falling. They cannot resist change forever. 

Above this image is the famous painting "Barge Haulers on the Volga". When we think about the symbolism that hides in this painting, we can see that is the entire situation in Russia. In that painting, we can see that Volga is the time. And barge haulers are people who want to resist change. When they want to pull state that is the ship to the past. They need lots of energy. Their entire time goes to resisting the river which is the change. 

Even if the national leaders are against change, they must realize that resistance requires lots of power. When the hands of those barge haulers are tied, they cannot write. Because they don't see anything else, they don't know about a better life. 

And that is one thing that is seen in modern Russian and post-Soviet communities. Governments in those countries resist the change even if that costs their entire nation. The only thing that means something is the position of the leaders. 

Only people who require the past are the people whose work and positions are under a threat. Somebody who resists the change might say that the livelihood of those barge haulers is threatened. 

But then we might ask: would that person take the job as one of those people, who pull the barge haul? Of course, if the beginning point in that work is being the chief of those men that seem a very good and ecological way to work. 

But would you make the work as a barge hauler? This is one way that we must realize before we can justify some other people and change. If we would sit on that ship and turn the rudder, that work seems very easy and light. But if we would pull that barge haul by using our muscles, we might see that this work is hard and boring. 

Why do we always remember only failures?

The blimp near Mexican border. 

When a person is once wrong, that doesn't mean the person is always wrong. But for some reason, we always remember only negative things. If the researcher made good research. And create fundamental things. The only mentioned thing is failures. That thing is called criticism. 

But does real criticisms mean that all thing that person makes is justified as false because some of the works didn't work? Should people still notice some successful things when they analyze some people's work? 

We all make mistakes. That is one reality. There is no perfect person on Earth. When some researchers make mistakes, they must analyze what caused that mistake. There is some reason for mistakes. Did they start introducing some opinions too often? Or did somebody else misunderstand the testimony? 

When researchers make their work. They must analyze evidence and search for things like DNA. And if somebody shot the UFO down researchers must analyze the material captured from the crash site. Before research all conclusions are non-scientific. 

There were plans in the 1990s to send balloons to search Venus and some other planet's atmospheres. So that means also balloons can have an unknown origin. Before research and analysis, it's impossible to close any possibilities away,

The media is full of stories about the "little green men", and then the astronomer's reputation is gone. People are laughing when a 150 Euro microwave oven caused a fake alarm. And then that thing is always destructive for research. 

At this point, I must say one thing. Even the best researchers in the world are helpless if they cannot see the thing that jet fighters shot down. In that case, they must follow the flow of evidence that some other publications in the media. 

The broken microwave ovens are objects that send radiation frequently all the time. When that radiation hits metal or some other atoms and molecules they change its frequency. But the problem is that this thing happens very often. 

Spy balloons are another problematic thing. There was the story that one of those balloons was sent by some "balloon brigade". And then the good joke was that the 12 Euro balloon cheated millions of Euro's jet fighters. 

The fact is that those hobbyists should tell where their balloons are flying better. The high-flying balloons are used for mapping stratospheric winds. And normally, the GPS and sticker are telling the origin of those balloons. 

So that was confirmation of the origin of one of those balloons. But there were two or three more balloons. The problem with balloon spying is that those balloons can carry systems that measure signals that jet fighters and air defense use for detecting their targets. 

People think that research is like reading some kind of book. If we think like that. We believe that we can take a couple of last pages from the book, and then we have the solution. When astronomers get some strange-looking "non-natural" signal. 

They must confirm its existence. And that is one of the hardest things. If some of those signals happen only once there is no way to confirm them. That signal comes from the direction of Proxima Centauri doesn't mean that its origin is in the Proxima system. 

In the same way the "face of Mars" is interesting. The images are somehow "interesting" because there even if they are sent using Viking frequency. That image could portray an undersea area. So did something come to the frequency that the Viking orbiter used? So does that "Cydonia image" actually portray something, that is on the ocean floor? That thing is one of the most interesting things in the world. 

Image: https://www.army.mil/article/8327/aerostat_visible_over_redstone_arsenal

Are we already found alien life?

"Small part of the Cydonia region, taken by the Viking 1 orbiter and released by NASA/JPL on July 25, 1976". (Wikipedia/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_(Mars))

Some researchers suggest that maybe we already found alien life or evidence of even intelligent lifeforms. But we judged them false too quickly. And then, if the falsification happens too fast, it's hard to change the testimony. But the fact is that the evidence of the suspected ancient Matian lifeforms is not found very often. 

And that is evidence that supports and denies the hypothesis about ancient primitive lifeforms on the red planet. The suspected bacteria fossils on a meteorite found in Antarctica look like cyanobacteria. So their origin can be on Earth. 

Somebody says that we already found evidence of intelligent life. In some theories, the "face of Mars" are created by nanomachines that can imitate things that they see. And some other people think that the famous image that is found in Wikipedia is from some underwater platform. 

Image 2) "Electron microscopy revealed chain structures resembling living organisms in meteorite fragment ALH84001" (Wikipedia/Allan Hills 84001) ALH84001 means Allan Hills 84001)

When we think about the Viking experiments in the 1970s there were some incoherences in samples that Viking landers analyzed during their operational time. That thing caused suspicion that there could be some primitive lifeforms on Mars. But then all those pieces of evidence were falsified. And after that, there has been some kind of discussions about the messages or signals captured by the SETI program. 

There was evidence that are against and supporting the theory that those BLC 1 and Wow!-signals were artificial. And the best thing that supports that theory is that those signals happened only once. The BLC 1 came from the direction of Proxima Centauri, but the origin of that signal is unknown. 

The Proxima Centauri's direction doesn't mean that signal comes from Proxima Centauri. There is also a yellow, sun-type star in another direction where the "Wow! signal could" come. The distance to that star is over 3000 ly. 

But why we are overcritical? Why is all evidence that are supporting life on other planets denied? The thing is that some people are thinking that "little green men" are a joke. We always forget that genetic engineering can make it possible that even humans can have green skin. Green skin can have chlorophyll in its cells.

And that allows the skin of the creature can create the same sugars as vegetables. So are the "little green men" some kind of joke? The thing is that genetic engineering can hybridize vegetables and humans. And that thing causes interesting thoughts in my mind. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/alien-life-false-positives/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Hills_84001

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLC1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_(Mars)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_program

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

Are there other realities?

 

 

 Are there other realities? 

When we are talking that reality can be the sum of all existent realities we must ask: is there some other realities than the reality where we are now? Reality is always a unique experience. But then we must realize that there is one remarkable thing in the human brain. 

The human brain can work in superposition. That means that we can do and think about different things. We can cook food and think about mathematical formulas at the same time. So in that case, we have two states in our brains. 

That means our way to realize things differs from dogs and other animals. Animals have only one state in their brain. They live here and now. In the human brain, the second state allows us to think abstract things without risk. The ability to think abstraction makes us unique. 

But if some animal starts to think about abstraction. That means the animal slides out of reality. And that thing puts our animals in danger. Because the human brain has different layers. Those layers can make many things at the same time. But if we do something the first time we must concentrate on that thing. 

Then we must understand another thing realities that we can observe might differ from realities that affect us. Reality and existence are things that are almost the same thing. The object can virtually exist. While a person sleeps those virtual objects turn into reality. They exist only to that person. Existence is a strange thing. 

We know that theoretically, a nightmare can kill a person. The emotional feeling or feedback from the nervous system can cause the situation. Where a person who has a weak heart can die because of nightmares. Because a person cannot separate reality and dream. That can cause a heart attack. 

***********************************

Can virtual reality turn real?

Sometimes people are asking can 3D virtual reality computer games turn into reality. Theoretically, we can think of the situation of those gamers of the game trapped in the electric chair. 

And if the character in the game dies, that launches an electric chair. That is the thing that can turn virtual reality into reality. That is one version of the thinking experiments. 

***********************************

Ants see reality differently than humans. In this case, the question is does the ant realize, and does it understand what it sees? And does reality require that actor realizes what the actor sees? This is an interesting question. Consciousness doesn't necessarily mean that actor realizes what the actor sees. 

When some insects see that something tries to slap them, it jumps away. So does the insect understand what it does? Maybe someday we know the answer. The fact is that reality is not the only certain thing. Things like hallucinations in mind. And 3D worlds in computer's memories are also reality. But they are not reality the same way as some forest is. 

Is reality exists?

  Is reality exists? 

Does the subjective experience make reality more or less exists? In some models, reality forms in the future, and at the point where we and time flow crossing, reality turns things that we can observe. Everything that we see happens in past. The time that photons take to travel from 200 meters away is minimum. But even in that kinds of cases, we see things that happen in the past. Things like fog and other disturbances affect information even in a short moment. 

The information that we get is not identical. The position and other things between two observers affect their way see things. Different experiences also affect people's feelings. And those things affect the way to see a thing. When two people are standing near some object and another of them has a strong negative experience connected with that object, that person sees it differently than the person whose experiences are neutral. 

Reality is a subjective experience. 

Reality is one of the things that we don't know. We know that something exists. Things like electrons are well-known things. But we cannot see that thing. We read those things from the net and books. 

Things like our personal experiences are modeling our relationship with reality. When we see something we cannot be sure, does some other actor got the same feelings about it? All our senses participate in forming of reality that we sense. But there are different ways to see things. 

In some models, reality is an illusion. That is formed in our brains. We know that absolute reality does not exist The position and senses of the observer determine how we see reality. And the ability to communicate between observers also limits sharing of information. If we are not telling everything to another person something is missing. 

So how can we say that another person feels and sees things the same way as we see them? And even the best description cannot transmit the entirety of our feelings to another observer. Full entirety means that we can transmit also things how we feel about those things. Sense of touch and sense of taste is hard to describe. That means we cannot feel and taste everything the same way. 

The AI can answer questions. But it doesn't realize what it answers. 

That thing makes AI problematic. If we ask for something kinetic or absolute from the AI that thing can tell many things about that thing. Kinetic things are like the technical details of Formula 1. The AI can tell colors and engine horsepower. But things like opinions, for example, which one is better, chicken or vegetable hamburger, or do you like heavy metal or classical music cause problems to AI. The reason for that is that AI doesn't have an opinion. 

The AI can say that it cannot tell opinions. But the problem is that the AI follows algorithms. Algorithms are program codes that describe how the AI must act in certain situations. So if the AI doesn't recognize the question about opinions it can start to find the answer from the net, by using certain parameters. And one parameter can be which pizza or which music gender is higher in order or listen to list. 

So the situation is similar as we will ask people which is the best hamburger, and then we can say that the best hamburger is the hamburger that is the most often bought. In that case, we can make elections and vote on many things, but that thing doesn't tell anything about our personal opinions about that question. 

The fact is that the AI cannot detect if the information is false. If somebody hijacks the sensors that the AI uses that thing means that AI cannot detect data coming from the camera or some other source like a high-resolution screen. 

There is no true or false data. There is only data. 

When we handle data. We must realize that our brain doesn't know if data is true or false. The thing is that data itself is just data. That means our brains and consciousness don't automatically suspect data is false or true. These kinds of processes are the result of training. 

When we see the object created by using a hologram machine, we can say that the object exists. It exists as a hologram. In that case, we have no responsibility if we describe the object as reality. If somebody introduces a hologram as a real object. And we cannot touch it. We have the right to believe that object is real. 

There are two images in this text. I took those images in the same place and the same place. The focus in those images is adjusted differently, and that makes those images different looking. The purpose of those images is to demonstrate how the difference in senses affects how we see reality. 

Lots of existence is out of our ability to observe it. 

An object is a reality in the form of a hologram. As I just wrote. But then we must realize that the reality. What we see is only a small part of our existence. We see only a shell of material. Nobody has ever seen the nucleus of the atom without extremely advanced systems. Same way as we see only a small part of icebergs. We see only a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

So that means there are lots of things that we can never observe without equipment like infrared or X-ray telescopes. Every year we find another part of reality. Reality does not exist in absolute form. We know that we see something, and the same way things, like insects, see something. But then we must ask: does the insect realize what it sees? 

In the insect's brains is two modes: hit or run. If an insect sees something it recognizes the object. If the object is food or a partner the insect goes near it. And if an insect sees something else it escapes. But in our brains is many other possibilities. Reality is something interesting to us. We might see many things, but because we don't always react outsiders cannot see, what we see. And another thing is outsiders cannot see how our brains modify things that senses bring to the cortex. 

Plato's cave is an example of selective information. 

Plato's cave is an example of selective information. Or brains are always selective because their capacity is limited. And they select things that they store. Everything that happens to the carrier of those brains happens just to that individual. 

This is the thing that makes every experience unique. If we see that some other person falls we cannot feel that thing in our own body. That's why we always react differently to things that happen to somebody else than we react to things that happen to us. This is why all experiences are somehow subjective. 

Reality is always subjective. If we would spend our entire life in some room and VR (Virtual Reality) masks are on our faces, and we ever go outside. We can think that reality is what we see on those screens. If we spend all our lives in one room, we can think that everything is like in that room. That room is our entire world. 

We can make that room a virtual reality without any VR systems. If we ever can go outside and we cannot see anybody else than some servants, all the information that we can get depends on what those people are telling us. 

The fact is that this is a high-tech version of Plato's cave. In that model, somebody controls everything that we see. The Internet could be the big Plato's cave if we just search for information that pleases us. If somebody covers the entire planet by using screens that allow that actor to deny that there are no other things in the universe except that planet. 

The thing is that even the biggest of Plato's caves are. Places where people get subjective information. People who use the internet are easy to blame for that thing. But even if we travel to distant countries we can select the information we want to see and feel. We can go to some country and then sit in a taxi or tourist bus and spend all time in a hotel. Would we get the right or diverse information about the country? 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-our-reality-may-be-a-sum-of-all-possible-realities-20230206/