Are computer games, and especially online games, so innocent as they should be?

   Are computer games, and especially online games, so innocent as they should be?

The thing is that there are many ways to use computer games for research, development, and intelligence work. Computer games or online games also offer online social media platforms. And there people can discuss and ask things from each other. When a person plays 1st. person action games. Some other person can ask, where other players learned some kind of tactics.

Or would some other player own some guns that are in those games? That thing allows intelligence officials to ask would some players be some kind of military officials. Or are the player's parents working in the military industry or other military work? 

"A study from Aalto University’s Department of Computer Science reveals concerning data collection practices within online games and highlights players’ misconceptions about privacy. The research identified manipulative design tactics that encourage data sharing and highlighted that players often remain unaware of the data collection extent. While players have adopted tactics to protect their privacy, such as preferring text chats over voice, the study concludes by stressing the need for games to prioritize transparency, safety, and player autonomy." (ScitechDaily.com/Billion-Dollar Secrets: What Your Video Games Aren’t Telling You)

The computer games can use as propaganda tools. Or they can use to practice drone operators cooperation. 

Criminals can ask where they can find things like guns using online computer games. We should have the same attitude to computer games as other social media. Computer games can be used to inject malware into computers or cheat money or identity. 

Another thing that social media and online computer games offer is a platform where the developers of AI can collect people's reactions. And then the AI tries to create counter-reactions for those actions. The AI or language models can move virtual characters that movements connected with virtual and augmented reality. 

When some character or group of actors are playing against AI-controlled virtual characters and then the AI uses compositional generalization to connect the best possible movement series by using a methodology that connects multiple databases. In that method, the AI uses the same models for multiple purposes. 

The AI uses ready-made templates that are like Legos in its entirety. The AI tries to reorder those ready-made templates. The AI can turn virtual actions straight into physical actions using the virtual models. Then it can transform that virtual model into a physical robot. 

But the AI requires information on which action series is the best. Computer games can teach AI which composition is the most suitable for some situations. For learning things the AI requires something, that it can use as simulation. Computer games can teach the AI how it must react. 

https://scitechdaily.com/billion-dollar-secrets-what-your-video-games-arent-telling-you/

 

Ancient technology was ahead of its time.

   Ancient technology was ahead of its time. 

"Image from an illuminated manuscript, the Madrid Skylitzes, showing Greek fire in use against the fleet of the rebel Thomas the Slav." (Wikipedia/Greek Fire)

We all heard things like Antikythera mechanisms and Greek Fire that could be a saltpetre-alcohol mixture. That thing causes extremely high temperatures. But it's possible. That ancient wise people knew things about centrifugal guns. Things like Aeolopile and Archimedes' Screw could use to shoot ammunition against the enemy.

"Animation showing how the Archimedes screw works, with the red balls representing water." (Wikipedia/Archimedes' screw)

 It's possible. Some ancient people knew that if they sent soundwaves to iron nails that thing sends resonance to enemy iron equipment and breaks those things. If that resonance will send through the sea. Enemy ships will be put together using iron nails that resonance can break the wooden structures around the nails. Those things are hypothetical ancient wisdom. 

"Drawing of the Baghdad battery's three pieces"

Also, things like hot air balloons and flight could known in the ancient world. In some theories, some ancient civilizations could know that if lightning hits spears or arrows those things would get strange forces. So those ancient wise men used natural electricity for making electric weapons. 

Even if famous Baghdad batteries are fake the ancient people must know that the metal bite is on a wooden platform. And if lightning hits it, that thing loads electricity to the metal bite. And things like electric fish can be used for loading those metal bites or capacitors. So the ancient people knew electricity. And they must know the places where they could load their electric equipment. 

Could Stonehenge be part of an ancient communication network?

In some visions, Stonehenge could be some kind of ion or plasmoid system. If there are mirrors that aim sunlight at the middle of the stone ring, that thing ionizes that gas. And then the druids could use things like magnesite bites to aim the plasma into wanted directions. That thing is one of the most exciting theories of the Stonehenge. 

The stone rings are in the middle of the network of stones. That thing makes it possible that the ancient stone rings are part of an ancient communication network where resonating stones transmit information. 

https://bigthink.com/the-past/examples-ancient-technology/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes%27_screw

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Battery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_fire

Could there be lifeforms at the outer edge of our solar system?

   Could there be lifeforms at the outer edge of our solar system?

"An artistic representation of how the northern infrared aurora would have looked in 2006 (marked in red). The darker red locations indicate confirmed aurora locations, with fainter red used to mark possible aurora locations. Credit to NASA, ESA and M. Showalter (SETI Institute) for the background image of Uranus, as was observed by the Hubble Space Telescope (in the visible spectrum) in August 2005. Credit: NASA, ESA and M. Showalter (SETI Institute) for the background image of Uranus, as was observed by the Hubble Space Telescope (in the visible spectrum) in August 2005." (ScitechDaily.com/Discovering Uranus’ Glow: New Hints for Life on Icy Exoplanets)

The researchers at the Leicester University confirm the IR-aurora around Uranus. That IR aurora could give energy to theoretical lifeforms, that can live on Uranu's high atmosphere. 

Could there be lifeforms on super-gold worlds like Uranus? Life as we know it requires liquid water. And the temperature on those icy worlds is very low. But then we must realize that things like gas pressure and gravity also affect water's melting point. If the gas pressure is almost zero, water could be liquid at very low temperatures. There could be lifeforms in Uranus' atmosphere or on the Triton moon. The metabolism of those lifeforms will be extremely low.

Global Color Mosaic of Triton, taken by Voyager 2 in 1989 (Wikipedia, Triton)

But because Uranus turns its other pole to the sun, there is a possibility that in that planet's higher atmosphere are primitive algae or bacteria that use the weak sunlight for photosynthesis. Even the atmosphere at high altitudes on the Uranus and Triton moons is very thin. It would not give protection against solar wind; we must realize that solar wind is very weak at the outer edge of our solar system.

Pluto

If we think of the dark smokers or cryovolcanoes on Triton Moon, the black smoke is nitrogen, ammonia, methane, carbon dioxide, and/or carbon monoxide. Carbon dioxide and methane are organic gases that are forming on Earth because of biological processes. 

The reason those cryovolcanoes exist is their low gravity and low gas pressure. There is a possibility that there are some kinds of lifeforms on Triton and Pluto. There is a possibility that those hypothetical lifeforms can get their energy from volcanic temperatures and weak sunlight. If those lifeforms existed, those creatures would be very slow and long-lived. Their metabolism will be extremely slow.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryovolcano

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triton_(moon)

What happens to all black holes?

  What happens to all black holes?

 

Are gravity waves the same as Hawking's radiation? 

How can photons escape from a black hole? The fact is that black holes transform all radiation that drops in it into gravitational radiation. Gravitational waves or gravitational radiation is one form of wave movement. If there is a suitable object. That can resonate with the right frequency and wavelength, it's possible to transform any fundamental interaction into another. 

The reason for that is this. All four fundamental forces or fundamental interactions have wave movement and particle forms. 

Chancing the wavelength of those wavelengths that bosons the transportation particles send turns the fundamental interaction into another. So changing the fundamental interaction into another like electromagnetism to weak nuclear interaction happens by changing the wavelength of those interactions. 

Black holes are sending gravity waves, and gravity is one form of radiation. When Stephen Hawking made his famous idea of Hawking's radiation or radiation that could escape from the black hole. 

The gravitational wave's existence was purely hypothetical. LIGO sensor found gravitational radiation in 2015. And Hawking died in 2018. There is the possibility that Hawking didn't have the will or ability to comment on the gravity waves. Gravity waves are causing the idea that maybe Hawking's radiation is gravity waves. 

"A research study using the James Webb Space Telescope has found that active galactic nuclei, supermassive black holes that grow rapidly, are less common than previously thought. This discovery suggests a more stable universe and provides insights into faint galaxies and challenges in identifying these nuclei." (ScitechDaily.com/What Happened to All the Supermassive Black Holes? Astronomers Surprised by Webb Data)

"While distant host galaxies for quasars and active galactic nuclei can often be imaged in visible/infrared light, the jets themselves and the surrounding emission is best viewed in both the X-ray and the radio, as illustrated here for the galaxy Hercules A. It takes a black hole to power an engine such as this, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that this is matter/radiation escaping from inside the event horizon." (BigThink.com/Ask Ethan: How does light escape from a black hole?)

We can say that the radiation jets from black holes have a connection with vaporization where black holes turn to radiation. The black holes help to create models that explain the gravitation. The result is that gravitation requires resistance or some kind of quantum field that presses particles or objects like a black hole into its form. Without that resistance or outside qauntum field black hole's vaporization turns so fast that it detonates. 

The fate of all black holes is vaporization. Those things turn into wave movement. And the reason for that is that no energy can replace the radiation that black holes send. Because black holes are losing mass, that means they send radiation. The wavelength of that radiation is gravity radiation or gravity waves. So black holes send radiation in the form of gravity waves. 

When black holes form in a supernova explosion. All material and energy will packed in the entirety called singularity. During a supernova explosion, the explosion blows all quantum fields out from the star. And then those quantum fields drop back to the place. Where stars have been.

Those falling quantum fields press all electrons, quantum fields, and quarks into an entirety that is smaller than atoms. Materia is one energy form and those quantum fields raise singularity's energy level so high that nothing can reach it. So black holes start to send gravitational radiation in the form of gravity waves around the universe. 

Two models can explain gravitational radiation and electromagnetic pikes at the black hole's poles. The idea in both models is that the singularity is so high-energy particle or object that nothing can cross the radiation wall around it. In some models, Hawking's radiation and the gravity waves that the black hole sends are the same thing. 

Whenever a singularity sends gravitational radiation it loses a little bit of its mass. Singularty's energy level is higher than any other particle, which means it can send radiation only in one direction. And that means nothing can replace that energy. This is the thing that causes the vaporization of black holes. 

Black holes are not black. They send radiation called gravity waves. So that means black holes are tensors that are turning all radiation that drops in that thing to gravitational radiation. There is the possibility that radiation that travels through the event horizon turns to gravitational radiation or gravity waves when they impact the singularity. In that model the energy reaches singularity but it cannot touch it and replace the lost energy that travels out from the black hole in the form of gravity waves. 

Model 1)

This model goes like this: When material and energy travel around the event horizon black hole pulls radiation in it. That radiation travels into the black hole and then reflects from the quantum gravity field around the singularity. The gravitational waves could fill the sphere behind the event horizon with radiation. And then sooner or later, that radiation goes too far from the singularity forming radiation that we see outside the black hole's event horizon. 

Black holes can pull radiation and material inside it. But that material and energy cannot reach the singularity in the middle of a black hole. In that version, the singularity sends gravitational radiation or gravity waves with so high frequency and short wavelength that nothing can reach the singularity itself. That means singularity can send radiation only in one direction. If no radiation or energy cannot replace that radiation the singularity will vaporize. 

Model 2 is almost the same as model 1)

Singularity is the point that spins at an extremely high speed. And if there is a so-called quantum channel in that extremely dense entirety, that channel can cause gravitational waves can travel to the black hole's poles. In that model, singularity aims all radiation through it and then conducts it to the black hole's poles. There could be a small quantum vacuum near those energy pikes and that energy rips the singularity in pieces or turns it to wave movement. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/light-escape-black-hole/

https://scitechdaily.com/what-happened-to-all-the-supermassive-black-holes-astronomers-surprised-by-webb-data/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

Roque planets and the strange theories of Immanuel Velikovsky

NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Telescope found 400 Earth-Mass-Roque planets.

Some rogue planets are remnants of supernovae and novae, or planetary systems of those dead stars. There is the possibility that rogue planets can form without a star. That means there could form objects that are smaller than brown dwarfs. And we can say that those objects are planets. Planets can form around sand bites in interstellar space. 

And forming of the planet only requires. That the mass of the condensing dust and gas clouds is so low, that those nuclear reactions cannot begin. When a star dies, it sends a massive, high-energy shockwave through the universe. That shockwave can push planets away from their orbital trajectories, far away from the dying stars.

So if a planet orbits the sun far enough or if another solar system that orbits the red dwarf is at a certain distance, the shockwave can push entire planets out of their orbits. The red dwarf's gravitational field is so weak that a massive supernova from a couple of light years away can push its planets away from their trajectories.

Also, things like beams from neutron stars and black holes can have a long-distance effect on other planetary systems. And of course, other stars and even massive rogue planets can pull distant planets out of their solar systems. In some theories, the planet Uranus has been a rogue planet that the Sun and our solar system captured.

NASA and Osaka University scientists suggest that rogue planets, which roam space unattached to stars, are far more numerous than star-orbiting planets. The impending launch of NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope could lead to the discovery of hundreds of such rogue planets, adding critical insights into planetary formation mechanisms. Credit: NASA (ScitechDaily.com/Cosmic Nomads: NASA’s Roman Space Telescope Could Find 400 Earth-Mass Rogue Planets)

The reason some people believe that theory is that Uranus lies on its trajectory. The pole of that planet is always the Sun. And the scars on the surfaces of distant moons like Triton tell something about impacts and forces that affect those distant objects at the edge of the solar system.

When we think about the biggest cosmic threats our solar system can face, one of the top ones is a rogue planet that comes from interstellar space. A very massive object's gravitation causes massive effects around the solar system, and multiple asteroids can fall from their trajectories. There is a plan that if some rogue planet comes into our solar system, we should destroy that object by using an antimatter bomb.

The antimatter bomb, or Teller's bomb, is the magnetic canister where antimatter ions like antiprotons or positrons hover. Then that canister will launch against that rogue planet. And a couple of grams of antimatter will destroy even a Jupiter-size planet.

Was Veliikovsky's "Venus" planet Uranus? That thing explains why there was nothing strange in the atmosphere when those strange "plaques" and floods happened if they happened. 

Immanuel Velikovsky and his strange ideas

In many sources, Immanuel Velikovsky (1895–1979) is introduced as a pseudohistorian. Many times, it is mentioned that this man was Jewish. Velikovsky was a psychoanalyst, and he studied at Moscow State University. The question is why that man wrote strange books where he claimed that planet Venus caused the catastrophes mentioned in the Old Testament.

Was the plague of the Bible some kind of rogue planet? There are two possible versions of that theorem. The first one is that Velikovsky's "Venus" was Uranus, which arrived in our solar system. Or there is the possibility that a quite small quasar planet or asteroid caused those plaques that forced the pharaoh to let the Hebrews go out of Egypt.

And then Velikovsky's strange theory that the planet Venus was behind the catastrophes mentioned in the Holy Bible The fact is that the surface temperature on Venus is high. But the planet itself is too cold, being born at the time when Hebrews fled from the pharaoh. So that theory was debunked.

But there is a possibility that planet Uranus caused some of those catastrophes. So we must ask, was the planet that Velikovsky called "Venus" actually Uranus? There is also another version of that theory. This theory goes like this: There was some kind of protoplanet in the solar system in the time of Pharaoh Tuthmoses(?).

The name of that pharaoh will fit the theory that Moses was part of the pharaoh's name. But that is only a hypothesis. Then that protoplanet simply fell into the sun because of the gravitational effect of some other planet. In that theorem, the smaller planet that traveled near Earth before it fell to the sun caused some of those catastrophes.

https://scitechdaily.com/cosmic-nomads-nasas-roman-space-telescope-could-find-400-earth-mass-rogue-planets/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

The ancient shark megalodon was not a cold-blooded killer, and that was one thing that caused its extinction.

"Scientists have discovered that the extinct megalodon shark was warm-blooded, as indicated by the isotopes in its tooth enamel. Their research suggests that the megalodon could maintain a body temperature about 13 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the surrounding water, a significant difference compared to other contemporary sharks".(ScitechDaily.com/Megalodon Was No Cold-Blooded Killer – And That Spelled Its Doom)

The ancient shark, known as "megalodon" is one of the largest predators in history. Megalodon was probably a warm-blooded shark. Or actually, megalodon was something, that was a combination of shark and whale. That means the "Meg" was a warm-blooded shark that used gills for breath. The other thing was that megalodon was not more murderous than some tiger sharks. 

Megalodon was a beast that needed lots of food and it had its place in evolution. But then some other sea predators reach that giant shark. Maybe those new predators like whales ate megalodon's calves. The whales had lungs. And they could also hunt in the water there was no oxygen. That made them able to reach megalodons. 

Maybe ancient whales didn't eat full-size Megalodons but competition for the same food was destructive.  The size of the megalodon was big. It was 17 meters long. And maybe its fate was a competition for food with Livyatan the ancestor of the sperm whale and other large sea mammals. Maybe full-scale megalodon was safe from "Livyatan".  Livyatan was also 17 meters long and about the same size as megalodon. 

But immature individuals were good food to those ancient whales. And when Livyatan faced full-scale megalodon the winner was whose bite was sharpest. 

But the other thing that made whales superior to megalodons was sonar. That allowed whales to hunt their prey in darkness. The sound system that those ancient whales used was suitable to use as a weapon. Sound weapons could break the megalodon's bones. And even today whales use soundwaves to track and terminate their prey. 

https://scitechdaily.com/megalodon-was-no-cold-blooded-killer-and-that-spelled-its-doom/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Livyatan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalodon

Particle theories, Big Bang, and negative mass are interesting things.

RHIC (Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider) particle accelerator opens new views into the universe.  The most interesting part of the research is that researchers try to find the critical point in energy level when quark-gluon plasma turns to particles. That point is a good tool to determine the age of the universe. 

If researchers find that point, they can start to find the point where the Big Bang happened. And that could open the biggest mystery in the universe. That thing is what happened before the Big Bang or during the Big Bang. One of the versions of the reason why the Big Bang happened is in theory, called "the Brane model". 

That model requires that there was some kind of electromagnetic field before the Big Bang. In that model, two electromagnetic fields touched each other. And that formed a standing wave. That standing wave between those electromagnetic fields pushed those fields back forming the wave where the Schwinger effect formed material in those wave movements or electromagnetic fields. The question is, of course, are those fields overlapped or side-by-side? 

The negative mass requires Higgs's mirror-field existence. So could the Higgs mirror field form by standing wave movement between Higgs fields? 

"Mapping nuclear phase changes is like studying how water changes under different conditions of temperature and pressure (net baryon density for nuclear matter). RHIC’s collisions “melt” protons and neutrons to create quark-gluon plasma (QGP). STAR physicists are exploring collisions at different energies, turning the “knobs” of temperature and baryon density, to look for signs of a “critical point.” Credit: Brookhaven National Laboratory" (ScitechDaily.com/Critical Point in Matter Transformation: When the Universe Changes Its Mind)

When we think of the model of the anti-universe, we can think that the universe formed. When two Higgs fields, or some other electromagnetic fields impact, forming a Schwinger effect.

When the Schwinger effect forms material. That effect formed particles and their mirror particles. So in this model, there is a possibility that our universe has identical twins. But in that universe, everything could be upside down. And the Higgs field could interact oppositely. In the model, the Higgs field pulls energy through the particle. That effect formed an electromagnetic low-pressure between superstrings. And that wave movement collapses particles sooner or later. 

But then we can think about a special case called Higgs Boson. Higgs Boson is like a wave that moves in Higgs field. That means the Higgs field must be more powerful inside that wave. So could the Higgs mirror field hide in the Higgs boson? Could Higgs Boson be a place, where the Higgs field interacts oppositely more than otherwise? 

The thing that makes this model interesting is that. Higgs Boson forms Z and W bosons and many other particles when it divides. In that model, the Higgs Boson can fall, and it sends shockwaves where the Schwinger effect forms those particles outside the Higgs Boson. Or otherwise, the Higgs boson releases a negative Higgs field from inside it. The negative mass requires a negative Higgs field. 

Standing waves and the Big Bang. 

Did two electromagnetic fields that impact formed the standing wave that sends energy impulses through the electromagnetic field? The idea is that all electromagnetic fields, including the Higgs field, and gravitation field can form standing waves if their frequency is the same. In some models of the Big Bang, the gravitation turned its mirror, and the antigravitation formed the Big Bang. 

Along with Higgs mirror fields could form by making standing waves between those fields. In that model, the standing wave can make the situation that the field that impacts it cannot travel through that thing. If standing waveforms between the particle and the Higgs field that locks the effect of the Higgs mechanism. 

Maybe, the extremely fast spin of the photons is the thing that makes it possible that the Higgs field cannot interact with that particle. There is a possibility to make the standing wave of the Higgs field between particles or layers by forming Higgs Bosons that send wave movement against each other. 

But forming stable Higgs Bosons is very difficult. And that requires so powerful energy pump that this kind of system requires extremely high energy production. Maybe things like antimatter systems can create these kinds of energy levels someday in the future. 

https://scitechdaily.com/critical-point-in-matter-transformation-when-the-universe-changes-its-mind/?expand_article=1