The intelligent sand can also cause problems with privacy.

Ant carries a microchip. 

Intelligent sand means sensors that are sand-size. They can get their power from the Sun. That means there is a small photovoltaic cell. The system can also use radiowaves that it collects from the antenna. And then that remote-loading system can make all kinds of measurements from their environment. The limit for the use of that kind of system is their price. 

The intelligent sand-size sensors can cover large areas. Those systems are operating as teams or large groups. That means those systems can make many diverse measurements by using individual actors. They have different sensors. So, the idea of intelligent sand is the same as drone swarms. Even one of those participants has only one sensor type. They can operate as swarms. 

By connecting intelligent sand with other systems is possible to make ultimate measurements. And that thing can revolutionize recon and other things. 

A cloud of intelligent dust can operate all kinds of missions. In the military world, they can measure and observe the burning of gunpowder if they are in cartridges. They can measure the resonance of the systems. And follow chemical reactions in things like oil. 

The small size of those sensors makes it easy to slip them into rooms. Also, developers can install those intelligent sensors inside engines where they can report problems. If those small dust-size systems have X-ray transmitters. They can make X-ray observations about the core of the engines. 

Intelligent sand-size sensors can shoot into rooms by using drones.

Those sand-size machines might not have a powerful communication system. And that limits their use. But intelligent dust can make every single insect into a cyborg. The insects like ants can also carry nano-size sensors in the house. The microchip takes that ant to control. And then the operator just drives that cyborg ant to the house. 

But the system can read intelligent sand's mass memory by using microchips connected to insects. Those cyborg insects can search those miniature sensors and then read their data. Then they can return out, and the drone can read that data. 

Intelligent dust can also turn insects into zombies or cyborgs. The insect takes the microprocessor to the jaws. And then the electric impulses start to control their behavior. The misuse of that technology opens horrible visions. 

There is the possibility that somebody turns the bee queen into a cyborg. And if that individual creature stings somebody, that thing means that all other bees are starting to sting. This makes that kind of system a very frightening tool.  

Data security and artificial intelligence are the combinations that will revolutionize attacks and defense.

AI-based hacking tools are the biggest threat to data security. 

The difference between regular and AI-based hacking tools is incredible. AI-based software is more flexible than ever before. 

Things like docker-container technology in software development are making it possible that if somebody is fast, that person can slip malicious code into that system. That technology must, of course, customize for hacking purposes, but the idea is similar to the container. 

And the AI-based container-docker can slip malicious code in all files if that container-docker is in the right place. The perfect place for that "egg layer" container docker is the firewall or antivirus o the system. 

*The AI-based hacking tool that plays firewall or virus scanner can deny all other attacks that the attack that the software's creator makes. 

*Developing that kind of tool is expensive and hard work. So the attacker who creates that kind of complicated software doesn't want to share that stolen data with others. 

*AI-based hacking tools can attack targeted systems around the clock. They can make automatized attacks without breaks 24 hours per day. And change the IP address of the attacker. 

*The AI-based hacking software can stay in RAM (Read Access Memory) and that makes detecting that tool more difficult because it doesn't write itself to mass memory. 

*The productive AI can change the download link of malicious software. And that thing can be more dangerous than ever before. 

*The AI-based malicious software can change its code to different order to avoid security programs. When that code is pass the firewall and virus scanner. The AI-based computer virus or surveillance software can re-order their source code. And then, it will pollute the target system. 

*The AI-based malicious software can replace the virus scanner or antivirus. And that allows it gets access to the entire network communication that goes in and out of the computer. 

*There can be a destruction mode in that software. And when that malicious software is made it works, like steal 30 000 000 bitcoins. It can simply destroy itself. 

The AI can break any person's privacy in seconds. It can map the social network of individual people. 

Similar systems like artificial-based Chat GPT can use for searching and connect information from multiple sources. So the AI can use to track people and make full-sale profiles about the person and the social network of targeted persons. Nobody is safe against AI. 

Only one image where the person is marked is enough for the AI. And then AI can search social media to look at that person. Image recognition makes it possible to search the other users of that social media channel. And even if a targeted person would not use that channel the system can search the texts that are connected to images. 

If four persons have an account on the precise social media, but one doesn't have that person mentioned but doesn't have that account is probably the person who is the lost connection. The AI can search things like company logos from pencils and then can start to search the homepages of the companies. 

Then that system can see if there is a list of the workers and their pictures. The right to make action determines the effectiveness of the AI. If AI can use things like E-mail and telephone that thing causes that it can ask for the person's identity from the images. 

AI can make the system more effective than ever before. It can see if somebody has problems with computers. It seems that somebody wants to avoid social media. The AI can connect data taken from multiple surveillance cameras. And then it can see where some vehicle moves and what is the speed of that vehicle. 

The use of AI is the next-generation tool. And that thing means that we must flex with that thing. When people were afraid, that social media destroy their privacy they were wrong and right at the same time. When AI detects if somebody walks against red light the system can simply turn the other lights red. And that guarantees a safe crossing road. AI can also search for things like suspected fights and send the information to the officials. 

Opportunities for AI are limitless. The problem is that AI has no limits. If we believe in legislation, we are betraying ourselves. Criminals are not following the law. If we think that AI is a threat we must develop programs that can respond the AI-based hacking tools. So, we cannot just sit and wait. That Russians are making better AI. 

https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/a-practical-guide-to-containers-dfa66d37ac30/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Container_(abstract_data_type)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docker_(software)

Why do dominating companies forget the R&D process?

The problem with dominating companies is that they have the dominating elephant's syndrome. The difference between dominating lion and dominating elephant is that the elephant eats vegetables.

For hunting, the lion must rise once a day.  But dominating elephants can stand to lay all day long and eat the grass. So the dominating elephant must not even move at all. All its food comes to its mouth. 

Or, if that elephant eats grass away from one place. It must move very slowly to find new grass. If there are no competitors in that area. The elephant must not run. 

The problem with dominating companies is that they are losing their innovations. Those companies are just sitting down and protecting their products by using patents. Then they just don't make any innovations. 

Because there is no new R&D process in the products. That those companies are making are turning old fashion. 

New platforms. Like ultra-secured and ultra-fast Internet. Are Offering a big opportunity for new and more complicated web-based solutions. And the new Chat GPT artificial intelligence is the next challenger in the world of the net. 

And why traditional  Internet-actors cannot answer that challenge? The reason is that their most innovative personnel packed their briefcases and moved to other companies. So because those companies are not working in the R&D section where are real R&D specialists there is no change give response to that new artificial intelligence. 

All past-years prime movers lost their position because their business started to get stuck in place. First, Microsoft took the number one position from Apple, and then Google took the number one position from Microsoft. 

Same way, Nokia lost its number-one place to Samsung because it didn't have smartphones. The cheap mobile phones were nice things. But then the fast mobile internet took films and other things to the mobile telephone. That opened markets to smartphones. 

The thing that fell Nokia the same that pushed Microsoft out of its position is that the new platforms gave new abilities to the new products. The new mobile applications require new tools that make them more effective. 

The thing that rises Google to the number one ICT service provider is the same that rise Microsoft to that position before Google took its place. The innovation that rose Microsoft to its position was great programs.

The operating system and other programs that Microsoft offered were great. But then came the internet. That opened the road to Linux and free software. The thing is that even if people use open and free tools for programming, their applications can be very highly secure. The open architecture means that the software is highly modified. And developers can customize it for each customer. The containerization makes the code highly flexible. And making personal individual solutions is easier than ever before. 

The well-known search engine that used a lightweight graphical interface made that search engine easy to use in slow telephone-based internet connections. And then,

Google started to share its office package with users. That is using Google mail. 

The missing network-based office solution was a problem for Microsoft.  Because, if the user wants to use the solution by using the mobile application and go from office to home. 

The network-based solution offers the possibility to start work in an office and then go home. And continue that work. The thing that a person doesn't need to carry a laptop makes the network-based solutions flexible. 

That is the reason why Google took its position in the ICT business. Tools that Microsoft offered were less flexible than those of Google. And then, Google started to share its Android operating system with cell phones. 

But then the new artificial intelligence caused panic in Google. And the reason for that is the leading marketing position caused a situation where Google thought that it controls everything on the Internet. Same way before Google. 

Microsoft and Apple thought that they owned a personal computers. The reason why Microsoft took its position from Apple was that Apple used so-called closed-source code. That meant impossible to create new programs for the Apple platform. The PC and Microsoft offered the choice to create their software for the computer by using free programming tools. 

But the things like Linux and web-based applications offered platform-free programming applications. When we think about code-academy and other web-based programming applications, the computer the programmer uses doesn't matter. That means the programmer can use Safari, Firefox, Chrome, or Edge browser. The browser itself offers the window to use the web-based programming tool.

The code itself is free. And the net is a place, where programmers can make their virtual applications and show their innovations. The Chat GPT is an innovation. It's an example that the company cannot forget the R&D process even if it's the top of the business. The web-based solutions are powerful tools. 

https://www.ibm.com/topics/containerization

The expansion of black holes. And, the ultimate form of matter. (Quantum rain II)

 The expansion of black holes. And, the ultimate form of matter. (Quantum rain II)

The expansion of black holes means that the size of black holes expands. But their mass is not growing. And that means something inside the black hole pushes the event horizon away from its nucleus. So that means that when a black hole pulls wave motion and particles inside it, that radiation reflects in the middle of the black hole. 

That reflection forms the gravitational shine of a black hole. That shine is the gravitational waves of black holes. And especially lone black holes. So are there some standing gravitational waves or gravitational skyrmions? That are forming whisk-looking structures around the black hole. 

Those skyrmions are the gravitational waves that deny the side-coming gravitational waves that go through them. But when that skyrmion turns away from that gravitational wave motion that travels out from the black hole. It lets gravitational waves travel through it. 

There is a possibility. If the wave motion will travel near the black hole's nucleus it can get enough energy. Back to the universe through the event horizon. That could explain Hawking radiation. If wave motion comes out from the black hole it must release its energy. And maybe that is the explanation for Hawking's radiation.  But the problem is how to prove that thing. 

Hawking's radiation is a mystery. Maybe gravitational waves that come through the event horizon send some other radiation. If a gravitational wave or gravitational string is precisely at the point of the event horizon.

That gravitational string conducts energy out from the black hole. And that energy is the gravitation. When black holes are rotating. Their rotational speed is almost the speed of light. 

That rotational speed creates a massive centripetal force. And that centripetal force pushes gravitational waves out of the black hole. 

The "string" is an extremely thin, energy or wave motion ray. And the QCD (Quantum Chromodynamics) or Schwinger effect means that because particles can turn to wave motion and otherways wave motion can turn to particles. Everything in the universe, including you and me, are wave motion. 

So the thing is that gravitational waves whose energy level is high enough can form a gravitational tornado inside the black hole. And if the energy level of that gravitational tornado is high enough that thing causes the effect where the gravitational field at the poles of the black hole is weaker than other places in the event horizon. 

Particle by particle

"Latent energy (quantum fluctuations) in the fabric of space-time may cause pairs of virtual particles to pop into existence throughout the universe. If such a pair is created right on the event horizon, or the boundary, of a black hole, one particle may fall in while the other barely escapes, taking with it a minuscule amount of energy and therefore mass from the black hole. This theoretical phenomenon is known as Hawking radiation" (https://astronomy.com/magazine/news/2021/02/the-beginning-to-the-end-of-the-universe-how-black-holes-die)

If we think that gravitational interaction is described in the last text "The quantum rain". 

That means there is a standing gravitational wave in the middle of the black hole. That thing transports energy out from the black hole in the form called anti-gravitation. In that model, the anti-gravitation is the reflecting gravitational waves that the standing gravitational wave motion will transport out from the black hole. 

Why in that case the gravitational waves and Hawking radiation can escape from the black hole. The internal structure of a black hole is like an onion. The gravitation acts inside that extremely strong gravitational field like in all other particles. Except the light cannot escape from that object. 

The point where escaping velocity of the black hole reaches the speed of light is called the event horizon. But inside the black hole, the escaping velocity turns stronger and stronger. That means the escaping velocity rises inside that super-heavy object. So the escaping velocity rises to levels 2X, 3X, and 4X... of the speed of light. 

But how can this happen? When the particle or wave motion travels to the gravitational center the speed of the particle or wave motion should slow. In this text, I will call wave motion and particles together as information. 

There is the lower mass of a black hole (or some other ball-shaped gravitational mas center) when information travels inside it. 

So there is less mass left at the front of the information that travels in the black hole when that information travels deeper in that structure. That means when information travels through the black hole the follow-up information pushes the forward traveling information to the center of the black hole. 

And there those superstrings or pieces of wave motion called information impact each other. Those fields can reflect from the nucleus of the black hole. Black holes are the extremely powerful gravitational center. But there is a small point where is no gravitation inside that object.  

With the fast-rotating gravitational field from the 2D structure inside a black hole, there is no gravitation and extremely powerful gravitational energy. So that energy reflects gravitational waves into that structure. That thing forms a gravitational tornado that pushes the other gravitational waves out from it. That thing would form the gamma- or X-ray pike out from the black hole. 

So the internal gravitational tornado of black holes shines. The gravitational shine pushes the event horizon away from black holes. That gravitational shine is the source of the gravitational waves of black holes. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics

Images: https://astronomy.com/magazine/news/2021/02/the-beginning-to-the-end-of-the-universe-how-black-holes-die

The quantum rain.

Could this be the key to gravitational interaction? The image above this text portrays a neutron star. That image could also portray elementary particles like quarks. There is the possibility that the gravitational field is similar to a magnetic field. 

So the pulling side of the gravitational wave motion or gravitational effect that a fast-rotating particle pulls inside is the particle is only far larger than the pushing gravitational wave or antigravitational wave that travels out from the particle. The idea is that a whisk-looking quantum structure turns the quantum field to gravitation. 

The term quantum rain means that particles' energy level decreases. The reason for that is cosmic inflation. And all particles travel into an energy level that is minimum in our universe. That means the material travels to a two-dimensional form. 

The micro- or quantum gravitation can tell why gravitation is so weak. But the effect of the gravitation is long-range. The reason for quantum gravitation could be in the form of particles. 

If each elementary particle is like a whisk-looking hollow object where extremely small skyrmions or quantum strings are forming a series of hoops. That is orbiting the area where the energy level is very low. 

And that means. There is lots of energy that travels out of those skyrmions. But gravitation is forming when energy travels through holes between the skyrmions. So that means the internal structure of each particle is cold. 

Same way when icy rain is cold because energy travels to those water droplets gravitation waves travel in and out from material or particles. The shine of quantum skyrmions pushes other wave motions out from those skyrmions. 

1) Elementary particle

2) Laser-ray-looking structure

3) Energy

The elementary particles are acting like small thermal pumps that pull quantum fields through the core of the elementary particles. That energy will travel inside a quark or boson and then it forms the laser-ray-looking structure that transports energy out from that 

So if particles are quantum skyrmions that are rotating extremely fast speed.  That can tell why particles are pulling each other together.  

When those skyrmions of whisk-looking structure impact with quantum fields. They act like antennas. The skyrmions take that energy impact into their structure. Then that skyrmion or superstring acts like spring. It conducts most of the energy to the poles of that structure. 

Above: The Standard Model of elementary particles. 

But a little part of the energy travels inside the elementary particle. That energy forms the axle- or laser-ray-looking structure. When energy travels in that stick-looking structure. Inside the elementary particle. It pulls energy out from the particle's internal structure. 

The energy that travels away from the poles of the quark and that energy stick would be the anti-gravitation or pushing gravitation. The impact area of the energy stick that comes out from the particles would be very small if we want to compare that area with the pulling effect of that wave motion. 

That structure works like a small pump that moves energy out from the quantum field around the particle. So the energy that travels inside that small thermal pump is the thing, called gravitation. Why gravitation interacts over long distances? And why it doesn't have a pushing form? Maybe, the area of pushing gravitation is so small that pulling gravitation covers it. 

The reason for that is all particles act as an entirety. The pulling side has a larger layer than the pushing side. So that thing means that the larger area of the pulling gravitational effect causes. That the pulling effect is more dominating than the pushing effect because the pulling effect affects large areas in comparison with the pushing gravitational effect. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/standard-model-physics-master-equation-2017-6?r=US&IR=T

https://theconversation.com/au/topics/neutron-stars-1325

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyrmion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Why dwarf galaxies near Milky Way, are found in the thin layer near the Milky Way?

The Milky Way is one of the spiral galaxies.  

Finnish astronomers found the answer to that problem. The location of those dwarf galaxies is a coincidence. That form where most of those dwarf galaxies are on certain layers is a coincidence. And someday in the future, the motion of those dwarf galaxies will break that form. But the fact is that the location of those dwarf galaxies is not (probably) fully coincidental. When our galaxy rotates around the supermassive black hole called Sagittarius A.

A centripetal force will throw material like gas and dust out from the milky way. That means that dust and gas will slow the motion of those dwarf galaxies. So dust and gas that is leaving the Milky Way will slow those dwarf galaxies and traps them in that position. 

There could be multiple positions where those dwarf galaxies are slowing. So that explains why those dwarf galaxies are in thin layers. But in this text, I just use the edge of the main spiral structure as an example. 

In that area, gas and dust that are leaving the Milky Way are impacting with gas and dust that is coming from other galaxies. That impact causes whirls. And there at the equator of the Milky Way is also forming more dwarf galaxies than anywhere else. 

The milky way rotates around a supermassive black hole called Sagittarius A. That rotational movement makes the spiral structure of the giant spiral galaxy act like a rotating layer. That means the centripetal force will push gas and dust out from the galaxy from its elliptic's equator. 

So that gas and dust will trap those small galaxies in the equatorial layer of the Milky Way. Gas and dust that escape from Milky Way are not very dense. But that thing causes friction when the dwarf galaxies are traveling across that structure. So those dwarf galaxies are spending more time in that area than in other places around the milky way. 

https://www.avaruus.fi/uutiset/tahdet-sumut-ja-galaksit/suomalaiset-tahtitieteilijat-ratkaisivat-galaktisen-arvoituksen.html

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-022-01856-z

Could SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) find extraterrestrial civilization?

Today there are no officially confirmed contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations. There are suspected artificial-looking signals that source could be something that we don't know. The signals happened only once. And that makes determining those signals' origin impossible. So the WOW! and BLC-1 signal's origin remain unknown. The thing that those signals happened only once is remarkable. The natural reasons should cause that signals to happen more often than just once. 

But if the sender of those signals were some civilization, we must ask why they used those signals only once. Were those BLC-1 and WoW!- signals some kind of highly packed and encrypted data transmissions that some mission is done? But are the senders of those messages or signals living alien creatures, automatic probes, some kind of military operatives, or private organizations? And what was the purpose of those signals that are the most mysterious cases in history? 

That is one of the biggest questions in history. SETI is searching for intelligent civilizations by using radio waves and spectroscopes. The first one is searching radio broadcasts of hypothetical alien civilizations. And the second one search for things like pollution that hypothetical civilizations are creating. But the problem is that SETI has no right to listen to synthetic radio frequencies. 

And the use of mass spectrometers requires that the alien race uses similar combustion engines as we use. Things like sulfur compounds can form for other reasons than in combustion engines. 

And things like burning forests are not the same thing as intelligent civilization. So even there is chlorophyll on some planets. That doesn't mean that there is something else. Than bacteria on that planet's surface. So all creatures in the universe are not intelligent. But otherwise thinking, the bacteria can also be intelligent. The neurons can hybridize with bacteria. And that thing means that there could be intelligent lifeforms that are far from creatures that are living on Earth. 

The problem is that also space probes are shown that searching intelligent alien civilizations is more difficult than nobody thought. Those probes that are using the gravitational sling to push them to the trajectory to outer solar systems would not find intelligent lifeforms even from Earth. Of course, those probes saw city lights and other kinds of things. 

But otherwise, they didn't find signs of life on our planet. The problem with exoplanets is that they are far away from us. And we cannot separate cities from those planets. Things like brightness measurements could tell if the planet's dark side is too bright. And that thing can help to make conclusions. That there could be alien cities. But that requires very highly accurate measurements. 

Confirmation of that thing is very difficult because there is needed to measure the planet's albedo. And then calculate what albedo on the planet's dark side should be. Then telescopes should measure the real albedo of that planet. But things like flashes of lightning and volcanic actions can cause the planet to be too bright. So that method gives a tip that somewhere could be planets. 

When we are searching for extraterrestrial civilizations, we must understand one thing. Other planets are not Earth, even if they look like Earth. That means alien species might have green skin that makes their skin photosynthetic. But we must realize that aliens might not have a similar culture as we have. 

Or those aliens might not live on a planet that is comfortable for us. For them, their home planet is paradise. This means that those hypothetical aliens might not be anything, that we can even imagine. 

And as I wrote earlier, "do you speak extraterrestrial"? That thing means that maybe we are already heard alien transmissions. But we just cannot recognize those transmissions. That means we might have a language barrier between us, and hypothetical aliens. And that means that we or they don't recognize the data. 

That those civilizations sent and the reason why we cannot recognize those transmissions can be they are highly encrypted. That means those transmissions are not meant for us. 

Or we cannot just hear those radio transmissions for some other reasons. One of them could be that a hypothetical alien race would communicate by using quantum entanglement. Or they send their data through wormholes. 

But the biggest problem with the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) program is that maybe we are listening wrong radio frequencies. 

SETI listens to the hydrogen alpha-emission line frequency. The more promising synthetic wavelengths are prohibited. Because of the information security. 

That frequency is the worst choice for searching artificial radio signals. The synthetic frequencies are better because there is less disturbance from cosmic radio background as hydrogen alpha line. There is the possibility that the cosmic radio background covers all artificial signals below them. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/seti-detect-earth/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLC1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal